2017-4-subscriber-input

Post your comments and questions for April, 2017.

Click here to see previous comments and questions.

101 Comments

  3. From a Subscriber

    >> Hi Catherine

    >> I suppose you have seen this, already. This is trending and — in my opinion — hugely important

    >> http://www.wbdaily.com/big-government/trumps-deputy-national-security-advisor-and-valerie-jarrett-are-close-friends/

    >> Huma Abedin and Ivanka Trump are friends

    >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2EGmPVP9-8

    Response from Catherine

    > Yes, have seen these.
    >
    > There is a concerted effort to provide Trump air cover by pinpointing Ivanka – or any of her friends. The new deputy nsa is someone used to put lipstick on the face of genocide but not a prinicipal in her own right. Just a conduit for those who prefer to stay invisible.
    >
    > Looks like Rice engineered her in. And I suspect Rice was in the White House on behalf of Baker, Schultz, Paulson and Kissinger etc. I am wondering if the Rockefeller faction has made a new deal with the Rothschilds now that David Rockefeller is dead. In essence it looks like the Rockefeller Republicans, the Conservative Christians and the Rothschilds/Izzies have a deal.
    >
    > Everyone else who supported Trump is dropping like flies.
    >
    > The 9/11 perps are back in sync.
    >
    > Appears that Trump is now falling into a Neocon groove. Question is why. Part of the challenge is with low approval ratings he can get nothing done except what the Necons combined with the establishment will engineer for him. Looks like the push for one world currency to me.
    >
    > Someone said the other day that WWIII started with 9-11 and will last until 2025. Beginning to feel that way. I continue to believe these guys are going to fail but it is deeply intuitive. Memories come from the future.
    >

  4. Posted over in Equity Overview:

    Whenever you listen to our equity overviews or anything on risk on the Solari Report, it might help you to understand my point of view.

    I am interested in our subscribers using your time and money to serve your purpose in life – to live a free and inspired life. As part of that, I hope to help you navigate risks and see opportunities. I want to make sure you are not harvested or taken advantage of – to the best of my ability. I also want to make sure you do so in a way that helps systemically – so we all can live a free and inspired life.

    What that means is that I am integrating information from literally thousands of areas and specialities trying to discern what is important in terms of risks and opportunities to your life, your family, your health, your time, your income statement, your balance sheets.

    So my focus is on integration as the knowledge informs successful strategies. One way I do that is to try to find the very best people and sources in each of those literally thousands of areas. Once I find what is the best source and have a framework for that particular area, I am not interested in diving down to try to become an expert myself or the mediate between the different legitimate disagreements or disinformation in the area. I would rather go on and integrate a new area.

    If a discussion does not add additional value to helping my subscribers have a free and inspired life or to do so in a way that increases the chances that 7 billion worldwide can, then I am on to find the best source in another area. Given the increasing risk, there is much to do.

    Hope that helps.

  6. Hello Catherine,

    I’ve been thinking a lot about your red button story and turning the red button green. I think this is more pressing than people think because the red button has a timer. If the timer counts down before you press it, you lose your pension and government checks anyway but you get to keep all the crime and corruption.

    When I look at our economics, we don’t need anything new other than redistribution. We need food, shelter, power (as a need, mainly for heating), and maybe companionship but anything else is just a bonus.

    We only need 1% of of our production going to food – although if you ask just about anyone other than super wealthy, much more than 1% of our work goes to paying for food.

    We have enough shelter already. How many empty bedrooms and empty properties do we have in U.S?

    As for power I think Elon Musk (although he works for Mr. Global) gave away the game the best in his Powerwall reveal linked here:

    https://youtu.be/yKORsrlN-2k?t=3m12s

    Just a couple of the Iraq war congressional budget supplements would pay for free solar power for the entire nation. We aren’t even getting into the stolen money or the actual government budget. This money that is contained in just the add ons to the budget would give free energy to everyone without any UFO tech etc. needing to be revealed. Just do a simple calculation of the cost per watt of solar and how much the nation uses in electricity and it is a very achievable number.

    So it is there – we already have it – how do we distribute it evenly?

    There is Chinese Buddhist saying

    “What is the definition of hell?

    Everyone sitting at a banquet of the most delicious food only they have 3ft chopstick stuck permanently to their hands so if they try to feed themselves they can’t get food to their mouth.

    What is the definition of Heaven?

    The same situation but everyone feeds each other.”

    1. Jonathan:

      Keep thinking about this:

      I’ve been thinking a lot about your red button story and turning the red button green. I think this is more pressing than people think because the red button has a timer. If the timer counts down before you press it, you lose your pension and government checks anyway but you get to keep all the crime and corruption.

      Profound insight – in a liquidation sale, you are only buying time.

      1. Hello Catherine,

        I’m honored that you enjoyed the insight.

        I signed up for the Pasadena lunch and I am really looking forward to it.

        In my opinion, there really are two basic problems facing the Economy 3.0, one is that automation now taking over more and more jobs. But the other issue rarely spoken about are coming breakthroughs in Longevity. If people don’t die and they don’t have a job, it’s a big problem in the current system.

        However, it is not a problem of resources, simply one of distribution. If everything was equal, people would only need to work a couple weeks a year to support themselves. You can see why ideas of Helicopter money and taxing robots are being floated. I don’t think the people at the top they have good ideas of how it will work.It seems they are fighting over this now.

        Carbon credits I think is one of these attempts – but it is a control economy. Control how much energy people can use and you control them. In the carbon credit economy you can’t use energy without paying a carbon tax – which bypasses government and is paid directly to the corporations allowed to print the carbon credits. This control could was achieved previously just by controlling the price of oil. Just looking into the solution for global warming and seeing that it isn’t a solution at all seems to point that it may not be a real issue in the first place. Certain none of the predictions from 10 years ago have come to pass and none of the computer models track reality.

        As you’ve mentioned, GMOs seems to be another attempt. None of these plans are really workable and it seems the people at the top don’t really even know and they certainly don’t want to share their wealth – war, depopulation may seem like an easy answer to those types.

        To really imagine a 3.0 economy that is just or fair, how would it work so people only need to work 2-3 weeks a year? The idea of property as imagined now prevents that because some people will always start accumulating more than others. Then rent seeking usually follows.

        Most societies without property rights are ones where most all members are also very happy. Pygmies (if you read the book “the Forest People)”, the tribes on Vanatu and communities of monastics etc. It may be possible to set up a community of people locally – similar to what is described in “Family Wealth–Keeping It in the Family”. But, in my opinion, if you really want the popsicle index to rise in your own community you have to treat it like your family weather you have an agreement with them or not.

        1. Good points. My concern with going without property, we will end up with 2 classes. The one who owns everything and the one who can own nothing. I think that is where they want to head. I have always wanted to avoid helping them get there!

Comments are closed.