2017-4-subscriber-input

Post your comments and questions for April, 2017.

Click here to see previous comments and questions.

101 Comments

  1. Hmm … it sounds like we agree more than not.
    And the so-called woman’s card – aka “cherchez la femme” – is not so much BS as it is acknowledgement that women are wildly more clever, intelligent, guileful, and by design God’s creatures that make the world go round.
    Trust me, I’m a guy, I know.
    Through (at times painful) experience, I have learned that Genesis is likely NOT allegory … it really happened. By proof, Eve’s direct lineal descendants still rule.
    As for Trump, it’s likely he knows his semi-narcissistic(?) enamor with Ivanka was used against him, thereby neutralizing him and his doomed presidency. Still he has game and he will go down fighting.
    p.s. I hope you know I’m not trying to be argumentative, just enjoying the banter.

    1. Oh, yes, I know. I enjoy the banter.

      I still trying to see all the forces at work – some piece of intel is still missing. Will continue my sleuthing.

  2. Catherine: I am a new subscriber and would like, as much as possible and practicable, to extract myself from the “Tapeworm Economy”. Is there a checklist somewhere that can be referenced? Something akin to “Catherine’s Complete Guide to exiting the Tapeworm Economy”.;An Illustrated Manual,Complete with a Self Help Checklist.

    1. Start here:

      http://solari.com/archive/coming_clean/

      Everyone is different. Essential to sequence what you do in a manner that gives you energy. Quick ones include

      Make sure you have a good local bank or credit union http://solari.com/articles/bank_locally/find_local_banks/

      Get the entrainment technology and EMF radiation out of your body and mind – check out our Solari Reports on these topics

      Eat the highest quality fresh food and water you can access

      Make a list of everything that is causing your Popsicle Index to go down – and then see if you can cut it out

      Pay off all debt if possible

  3. Maria Callas sings Casta Diva ….haunting and sublime!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDax8rSE8I8

    Also …

    I wrote my Senator about my objections to 5G technology. In his short reply (see below) he seems to say …The committee gets all its technical information from professionals and they know best. I think he’s already made up his mind. Never the less I will write him back and include some youtube clips that present the dangers of this technology. Is there any particular source you think I should include in my comments?

    Happy Easter and a Glorious Resurrection is wished for all my Solari friends.
    Love is forever,
    Katie

    Here is his reply:
    Dear Ms. Madden:

    Thank you for contacting me regarding wireless services and radio-frequency exposure. I appreciate hearing your concerns.

    Under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, Congress granted the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) the authority to evaluate the impact of FCC-regulated radio transmitters on the environment. As a result, the FCC has adopted radio-frequency exposure guidelines, and continues to monitor research and consult with experts on safety issues to see if those guidelines need to be revised.

    As Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, which has jurisdiction over the FCC, I will continue to monitor these issues closely. Please don’t hesitate to contact me in the future.

    Sincerely,

    Bill Nelson

    P.S. From time to time, I compile electronic news briefs highlighting key issues and hot topics of particular importance to Floridians. If you’d like to receive these e-briefs, visit http://billnelson.senate.gov/contact-bill/newsletter

    1. Catherine:

      From Jason:

      Not sure of the best approach for the congressman but here are some thoughts and papers I would draw his attention to. This just out very powerful video by industry expert Paul McGavin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRXIJgKoTpg&feature=youtu.be&t=59m03s who has a great website http://www.rfemf.com/index.html

      The Federal Communication Commission (FCC) guidelines in place today were developed in 1996. These address only the thermal (heat) impact which boils down to how much radiation it would take to heat the skin of a six-foot 220-pound military man. The limits are very high and they do not address the much lower non-thermal impacts that come with use of today’s devices. Science has since proven there are many harmful non-thermal effects. http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec01_2012_summary_for_public.pdf

      https://ehtrust.org/policy/fcc-safety-standards/

      https://ethics.harvard.edu/files/center-for-ethics/files/capturedagency_alster.pdf

      Two books I’d ask him to read would be

      http://www.goingsomewherebook.com/

      https://www.amazon.com/Overpowered-Dangers-Electromagnetic-Radiation-about/dp/1609806204

      5G specific

      https://sites.google.com/site/understandingemfs/5g-IoT

      https://ehtrust.org/cindy-lee-russell-m-d-letter-fcc-5g-review-radiofrequency-health-proceeding-13-84/

      http://scientists4wiredtech.com/2017/04/oppose-ca-sb-649/

      1. Hello Jason:
        This is exactly what I need. Thank you, I will send this to Senator Nelson and keep you posted about any sort of reactions. All the best…Katie

  4. I thought this was a very good 45-minute presentation on all of the scientific fraud behind HIV and its supposed connection with AIDS. Many different doctors and scientific experts are interviewed in here, and they discuss how the treatment for HIV is oftentimes the direct cause of AIDS:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0KPaOh_xwc

  5. Although I always find it difficult to listen to Kerry Cassidy, I enjoyed listening to your responses as you always provide a tweak to information you might have communicated before and that little nuance is enough to light the bulb over my head. I did send Kerry a note on her FB page essentially telling her that if she could cut out the following phrases, she would be a much better interviewer: “in other words”, “so to speak”, “you know”,” This is what I am saying”, and “I don’t know what you think”. The latter is particularly difficult because unlike interviewers like Daniel Liszt, who do incredible research into all of his interviews, she should actually have a clue about what you think because there are hours of interviews with you on the internet. What totally blew me away, and what I explained to her is a phrase NEVER to use as a response is “whatever”. When she said that, I threw up my hands. It is enough to admit being influenced by the land of fruits and nuts, but to insult the other person with a “whatever”… well, WHATEVER.

    Heh.

    1. Some do find Kerry’s interview style distracting. I like her work because she works hard to get some of the best interviews without fear for what is socially respectable. Being trained as in investment banker, I am unaffected by interview style if I am getting the tidbits I am looking for.

      1. What I find refreshing about Kerry’s interviews is that she does not shy from the unexpected but I do believe, like you, that her history suggests that she does, in fact, insist on people who represent the best of what she believes to be true. Problem for me is, that if we, as alternative media/thought, intend to create a path of substantive internet articles, then it would help if English was prime and that the constant barrage of irrelevant phrases could be eliminated. I have a hard time believing that you were not trained like me to think of correct grammar before speaking which allows you to elocute speeches that are not debatable. (Friends and colleagues agree that is one of your most incredible ability beyond your understanding of economics.) Should we intend to go forward with concepts to create the most educated reader, we must, at least, be able to speak English (whether in an interview or on paper).

        1. We have the most wonderful retired English professor proofing some of our material. I dream of the day I can have him and his colleagues review everything. Nothing like impeccable English – I love it, but it is beyond me!

          🙂

  7. I’m confused and uncomfortable with the video “Obama Flees USA . . .”. Seems pretty meaningless, in that the bugging of everyone and their dog has been going on way before Obama. I don’t doubt that the spying escalated. In fact, I’ve seen media accusations that his was the least transparent presidency and the most punitive to whistleblowers. However, the video seemed silly to me and short on facts- but disturbing after the narrator asked what will Americans do – then ends with photo of a noose. Lynch him? Is that it? That’s a little too stereotypical to for my comfort level.

    I’m surprised the video was posted at all.

    1. I just went into the website and changed the ridiculous title. I also found a Daily Mail piece on the Tahiti trip and posted.

      1. Thank you for your explanation- and it’s interesting about the fear of exposure re pedophilia.

        So much human trafficking is open and notorious, it seems to me, thinking in particular about the abundance of massage parlors with “happy endings” that seem to be very visible in most towns, the many nail parlors, and so-called reflexology parlors. Most of those I am referring to are staffed by immigrant women, and I am always suspicious that they were lured here with false promises, and are now basically slaves. To add insult to injury – if we know it, then law enforcement certainly knows it . . .

        Pedophilia seems to be gaining a similar reputation – that it is far more widespread than most folks would have dreamed. I recall an FBI investigation that discovered thousands of American men who visited a very few websites devoted to child porn. Because there were such an extraordinary number of men involved, the FBI was forced to confine its targeted prosecutions to only those men who worked in occupations that involved children – like pediatricians, coaches, scout leaders, teachers, etc. Stunning, isn’t it? Wonder how many men of prominence or say, elected officials – got off the hook?

        Back to Obama, I would be very surprised if he doesn’t have a designated agent that accepts service of process for him. If not, after reasonable efforts to serve are made, I would think that service via publication can suffice for civil court jurisdictions.

    2. I agree the quality was low.

      I posted it not because I agree with the guy who made it or the points made. The reason I posted was that I find it very significant if Obama left at the very same time that Judicial Watch was trying to serve on surveillance issues and the administration did a U turn on the middle east. If he left town, it was because someone very much wanted him far away. It is quite a switch from the gearing up to launch his foundation and plans for providing a very active policy shop. Looks to me like there may be a reasonable chance that the leadership is very worried that the infighting is in danger of going out of control. Another signal is Pompeo going after Wikileaks. My guess is that they are worried about more dumping out on pedophilia and players with that or criminal liabilities pushing things out of control.

Comments are closed.