64 Comments

1. A good example of what Dr. Farrell describes about broadcasters emphasizing ACTION words at 1:41 is the latest SURGE in this or that novel new virus or flu bug that is here EARLY (it’s not this year- it’s the same seasonal as ever, oct through march) to induce FEAR. They rule/control through fear. I’m also a subscriber to Curry and Dvorak’s “No Agenda” show and they do a great job of deconstructing the news since they both spent so much time at MTV and IT mags, etc over the decades as insiders- Adam Curry as a broadcaster and John Dvorak as a writer and voice over. Anyway, that IS how they do it. That’s why when you see video clips of broadcasters on ABC, NBC , CBS and Fox affiliates speaking EXACtlY the same scripts, sometimes they do not emphasize the same action words. Because they’re not all so very sharp, or disagree what the best ones are to punch up. But if the script came with CAPs or TOLD them what to emphasize? That’d be a dead giveaway, and more of their ilk would put 2 and 2 together and realize they’re being had (as if they didn’t know- ask Susanna Guthrie when she’s had a couple about what Matt Lauer ACTUALLY did to get exposed and excluded). imo

2. LoopMy heart is so happy to see you two together again!

3. One other note. CAF sometimes refers to her Course of Miracles reading years ago. As a fellow-ACIM student of several years allow me to link the quote she often mentions that brings some of us spiritual comfort:

   Nothing real can be threatened.
   Nothing unreal exists.
   Herein lies the peace of God.

   For the full text and backstory, link here: https://acourseinmiraclesnow.com/

4. One other note. Catherine sometimes refers to her Course of Miracles reading years ago. As a fellow-ACIM student of several years allow me to link the quote she often mentions that brings some of us spiritual comfort:

   Nothing real can be threatened.
   Nothing unreal exists.
   Herein lies the peace of God.

   For the full text and backstory, link here: https://acourseinmiraclesnow.com/

5. Great listening to your conversation. Some of it was really inspiring and I listened to it a second time.
   I’m interested in the discussions of world events and by including methods on what to do to live a better life, makes this better from other people’s talks I also currently follow.

   The laundromat washing machines in the graphics you spoke of, was such an original idea as well. Had to laugh when i saw it recently!

6. Thank you for this interesting conversation.
   Katherine Watt writes at Bailiwicknews@substack.com I think she is brilliant.
   She presents an interesting solution to the problem of successfully prosecuting fraud “when the government knew it and participated in it.”
   Here is her proposal for a strategy to prosecute the case of Brook Jackson, who is testifying in a federal case against Pfizer based on her work for Ventavia, which was contracted by Pfizer to do (fake) clinical trials.
   Quote from Bailiwick News:
   The strategy — joining the US Government and named US Government officials to the False Claims Act case as defendants, and adding 18 USC 2333 civil claims based on terrorism and related government-directed crimes — is a lot for people new to the information to absorb in just a couple of days. It takes time to understand the legislative and executive history underpinning the US Government’s criminal enterprise.

   The main reason this is such an unorthodox legal strategy is that, in most False Claims Act cases, the US Government is the lead plaintiff, and is supported by the Relator whistleblower (in this case Brook Jackson), who provides the government with evidence obtained during his or her private employment with contractors supplying goods and services to the government.

   In Jackson’s case alleging clinical trial fraud by Pfizer against the US Government, the truth is that the illegitimate part of the US Government (treasonous infiltrators working for the globalists) is collaborating with the contractors (Pfizer, Ventavia and many others) to engage in criminal fraud against the legitimate part of the US Government (remnants TBD), the unwitting employees of the contractors, the American people and all the people in the world who are being defrauded, sickened and killed by the bioweapons fraudulently presented as “safe and effective Covid-19 vaccines” subjected to valid scientific testing and a valid FDA regulatory process.

   Katherin Watt continues her explanation in another post:
   In other words, Brook Jackson’s case — if the US Government is joined as a defendant and a 18 USC 2333 claim is added — can be used to force the US Government to take one of two positions in response to overwhelming evidence that identifiable US Government officials have orchestrated and committed mass murder using bioweapons developed by the US Government:

   1. Mass murder using bioweapons is the official policy of the US Government, and the people who planned it and are carrying it out were and remain fully authorized to do so.

   2. Mass murder using bioweapons is prohibited under US and international law, and the people implementing the programs are rogue elements who are not authorized by the US Government, and therefore can and should be removed from power, charged, tried, convicted and punished.

   1. Oooh. I wholeheartedly agree with this interpretation of the False Claims Act. (I’m not a lawyer, but have worked in pharma for 30 years) Normally, the claims about the shots would have been considered false claims, had they been made by the manufacturer. Instead, the government itself made the claims, so it looks like there’s no one to hold accountable. If there’s a way for CMS to hold Fauci accountable to the FCA, that would be some brilliant legal maneuvering.

      I explained this on.a FB post and my dad, a liberal pharma attorney (previously an oxymoron, but no longer so due to corporate brainwashing of the masses) tried to convince me I was wrong and that the government didn’t have the same responsibility as a corporation. I pretty much called BS and we haven’t discussed it since.

      Prayers that this works!

      1. Thank you for understanding the brilliance of Katherine Watt. Unfortunately she is not a lawyer and is not directly involved in the case. She has offered her strategy to the lawyers who are in charge of the Brook Jackson case, who have declined to respond, who knows why? Katherine is looking for the right case (if Brook Jackson doesn’t turn out to be it) and the right lawyers to use this strategy to present a case before the right judge to prove criminal fraud by rogue infiltrators into our government working in collusion with Pfizer against the American people. So we cannot pray that it works yet. We need to spread the word of the plausibility of this strategy until someone with access and clout picks it up and runs with it. We can pray for that. Like Katherine Watt pointed out, either mass murder using bioweapons is the official policy of the US or it is prohibited under US and international law and therefore any rogue elements pushing this doctrine can be removed, convicted, and punished.

7. This is the place I come to for coherence. Long live CAF and Dr. JPF

Comments are closed.