WITH CATHERINE AND JOHN TITUS

Theme: Just How Big Is the Breakaway Civilization?

Take Action:

Please login to see stories, charts, and subscriber-only content.
Not a subscriber yet? You are invited to join here!

127 Comments

  1. John and Catherine, at ca 57 min John discusses the Alex Jones trial and the “accidental” release of privileged client-attorney information to the plaintiff’s attorneys. I am no legal expert, but just heard an interesting summary of the trial by Robert Barnes (who is an attorney for CHD in some cases, as far as I know) and he explained a little more of what happened in the trial with regards to due process, jury selection, the judge, the restrictions the defendant faced with regards to what could be used as defensive arguments (ever heard of that before?), the fact that the whole trial was filmed by several professional filming equipment because it is to be made into a film eventually (the segment about the AJ trial starts at ca 52 min, at ca 1:00 hr Barnes starts going into the story about the defendant’s documents getting into the hands of the plaintiff’s attorneys and what they did with it – and the court not stopping that): https://rumble.com/v1fcuof-trump-raid-biden-doj-crosses-the-rubicon-wrobert-barnes-live.html
    Just as additional info, I am not qualified to comment on any of this professionally and I have not checked all the claims made, but providing this is a true account of what transpired, I wonder what happened to the definition of due process?

    2. Your last question really nails the purpose of the op that we are watching take place.

    3. I hadn’t seen your post prior to mine. I watched the same video you linked but have heard Barnes on other podcasts detailing the blatant denial of basic rights of an accused. The goal is to take Jones out once and for all. (Sandyhook being a pretense) send a message to all others who dare question any of the establishment narratives and to set legal precedent to use against same.

  2. Opera at the Bregenz Festival?! I am so jealous. Said by a person who carries essentially no jealousy. Beginning with lockdowns, and now with the requirement of a “health passport” to enter, I haven’t been to concert or opera for over two years. The arts have been crushed where I live. Although some may think the arts peripheral to life – they are solace of the soul. Sigh.
    As for Ukraine, if I am not mistaken, Monsanto was the first US corp going into Ukraine after the 2014 coup. That excludes of course the pre-existing biolabs. Also, if I am not mistaken, Ukraine is the first “country” to impose a digital ID. So no ID = no food. Ukraine seems to be the test animal in many ways. As for the mega US corps in Ukraine – an “ah ha” moment. That’s where all the “aid to Ukraine” money is going. It’s approaching $40 billion at the moment that we know of.
    With salutations and gratitude.

  3. Atty. Robert Barnes gives an excellent and in-depth legal analysis of the Alex Jones trial and the implications for precedent eliminating any speech that counters the establishment narrative, i.e. Jan 6, election fraud, climate change, vaccines. Jones has been denied just about every Constitutional right to his own defense. It is truly a kangaroo court. and the judge allowed filming for future a documentary. Barnes points out that only the defendant can waive atty/client privilege, so the claim that Jones’ attorney didn’t claim privilege on phone records disclosed to the prosecution makes them “free & clear” is false. Also, potential jurists were screened as to how much they would be willing to ask for damages, with only those who would be hugely punitive being selected. The judge is blatantly biased and has inserted herself in unethical, if not illegal, ways.

    1. The whole thing is an op. No one acts this way in a court. I watched the testimony of Jones and heard his zingers. The lawyer for the Plaintiff was ridiculous. Really, this is about hammering the credibility of our legal system as much as anything else. John Titus is right on about this. I have never seen camera work like that in a courtroom where it zooms in and out in dramatic fashion. There is a huge push to discredit our legal justice system and that is extremely dangerous.

      1. http://mileswmathis.com/jones4.pdf

        “I also like the part about the judge “scolding” Jones for lying under oath. Ridiculous, since it is called perjury, which is a crime. You don’t get “scolded” for perjury, you get cited, fined, or jailed for perjury. But there has to be clear evidence for that, and a finding. Without clear evidence of it, the judge would not be able to mention it during trial, since it is prejudicial. It tells the jury Jones is a liar. As it is, the judge just entered the claim of perjury into the record without an actual finding of perjury. Which is itself illegal, which shows up the trial as fake.

        … It was all staged as a bluff, to make you THINK you could be sued for stating your opinion and presenting evidence. It was staged to keep you quiet. There are no laws of that sort, but they want you to THINK there are. Because if you keep quiet from fear of lawsuit or prosecution, there is no need to actually have any laws. You will then be controlled by lies, not laws.”

        Idea for “Let’s go to the movies”: TV shows and movies about the US justice system. David Kelley made a few, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_E._Kelley

  5. The Alex Jones “trial” makes a lot more sense if you think of Jones as a CIA asset. Ultimately in on the plan to make it illegal to question the narrative…

    1. Yes, exactly, I am not saying he is, but from the word “go” there is something not right with that guy, he is a House of Mirrors, he is incoherence and God knows we do not need incoherence in our life. Not to mention the guy plagiarized my work, when I used to write for an activist in Philadelphia who Alex Jones interviewed a couple of times. The sad part is, it was an article based on my personal experience with a certain South American country that was on everyone’s radar because of its collapse. All Mr. Jones had to do was ask if he could republish my work, but hey he went ahead and did it anyway. I wrote to him several times and tried to call him, but I am a nobody, I just nothing.

      Stay away from Alex Jones, he is bad karma, a House of Mirrors, pure incoherence.

  6. As someone who took a year of law school at Seton Hall School of Law before dropping out, I learned enough to know that John Titus is the real deal in terms of his background as an attorney and so if he says that the Alex Jones trial was staged, you better believe it.

    You see this is why I keep telling people you need to stay away from Alex Jones, he is bad karma because he keeps playing with fire with his bombastic claims, fear porn and yellow journalism, stay away from that guy, stop reading infowars, stop watching him, he is a House of Mirrors and you don’t want incoherence in your life, I certainly don’t.

    1. If the trial was fake, I wouldn’t be surprised if Jones was in on it. I agree with you, he is a House of Mirrors. A friend’s son ended up in a mental institution for a brief time after becoming completely paranoid listening to Jones. This happened right after the January event at the capitol.

  7. Catherine I love the fact that you did not know who Venmo is, I had no idea what Venmo was for a long time, until people kept asking me, are you paying via Venmo? Every single time I was like, what the heck is Venmo? Especially in Austin, oh my God, Austin, Texas is where people kept asking me if I was paying with Venmo.

Comments are closed.