133 Comments

  1. These sustainable goals and ESG is everywhere. Its like a virus that infiltrated every company and the government here in New Zealand too.
    I am in the habit to point out to my colleagues and friends at work how the company emails we get as employees, fit in with the whole ESG goal.

    I work for a large corporate here, so the propaganda is thick and fast and its a constant stream of “Diversity and Inclusion” and “Climate Change” etc etc

    I went from someone annoyed at all this a year ago, to now enjoying using each email or company campaign to teach those around me, of the real plans behind it and how our company is just scrambling to ‘up’ their ESG score for foreign investment deals. No other reason really.

    I have managed to open my managers eyes to this too, and I reckon he is spreading the knowledge amongst his colleagues. We’re low in the company chain though, but the more informed we are, the better. We need to tell people around us what’s really behind all the rainbow diversity equity inclusion campaigns that bothers them quietly and to which its become impossible to speak out openly, so we need to focus on attacking these policies at their ideological source. The anti freemarket scam of a cartel system that is ESG.

    Marlene

    1. I’ll add the Chartered Institute of Buildling Services Engineers (CIBSE) and the UK’s IEE/IETE to those promoting the green/CO2 agenda.
      I see nothing wrong with promoting schemes to reduce the use of energy by buildings, but the unquestioning use of “AGW” or “Climate Change” as a belieft system is against all engineering principles.

  2. Catherine, John Titus, and Solari members would be well advised to read the newly published substack article by Katherine Watt entitled, Biotech Idolatry: DOD-Pfizer contracts have replaced federal constitutions and laws. To oversimplify, her analysis of the contracts reveal the DOD is behind the manufacture, promotion and approval of these products. Actionable intelligence…

    https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/biotech-idolatry-dod-pfizer-contracts

    1. It bothers me when I see a site dressed up to look like a medical journal, but which is clearly pushing an op-ed piece. This is linked to as “evidence” within the substack article you referenced.

      https://www.ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/52/83

      For people who have no experience reading scientific literature, this may appear as a legitimate source. But it’s actually preying upon people’s respect for science, while secretly disdaining their ability to recognize it.

  3. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/09/19/johnson-johnson-and-a-new-war-on-consumer-protection

    “The L.L.C. that Johnson & Johnson created never had an office or any employees of its own in Texas or North Carolina. It never manufactured or sold talcum powder; for that matter, it never really conducted any business at all before going belly up. Still, in between its formation in one business-friendly jurisdiction and its bankruptcy in another, the new company took on all of Old J. & J.’s talc liabilities. It was suddenly responsible for some forty thousand talc cases, while a new company, also called Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., emerged with all of Old J. & J.’s assets—those tens of billions of dollars—and none of its talc liabilities, leaving it free to carry on with its operations.”

    1. The video, linked above, is from 27 February 2022, apparently.
      Which seems odd, because the Russians officially announced their involvements on 24 February, and he should have known that an insurgency was ongoing for a few days , rather than expressing surprise.

      1. nothing odd. this was a so-called “general debate” in the German Bundestag which took place on Feb 27th, right after Feb 24th (start of the Russian SMO/war in Ukraine). Merz is the leader of the opposition party (CDU). to me, it sounded like a Freudian slip of the tongue (as he was referring to the day of which we all remember where we were when we heard the news – Sep 11th, 2001), he was about to say that everybody will remember where they were on this 24th of February 2022 when they first heard about the war in Ukraine – there he used the word “september” instead of “february”. He sounded more agitated in that speech than usual, because of that it sounded to me really just like a mistake (and yes, he had worked for BlackRock for several years after leaving German politics for some while before coming back when the “succession” question for Angela Merkel was getting under way).

      1. This is pretty farfetched and while I have not read all the supporting documents, one way to view it is to note that his premise is that “the military” will do the job, while the rest of us “Barney Feiffes” can sit back and watch. Derek makes no mention of the execrable General Milley, nor the bumbling former general, Lloyd Austin. I’m not sure, short of a mutiny, how their necessary removal works, and the presenter makes no suggestion of a denouement in any case. In other words, what happens and what comes afterwards?

        There is inherent danger in hoping for Deus ex machina, which is what’s being offered. I would not be complacent.

        1. Thank you John. I understand his presentation is lacking in presentation and truly not groomed for a world audience as is. But the lack of investigation into his claims which he backs up with a list of documentation for all to read…he has proven his point in the fact of most are lazy to go read the documents for themselves, to see what he says is supported. I do agree that his video is overly emotional, and tends to cause the listener to dismiss his message. Which is unfortunate. I plowed through it, pulling out the facts, and am taking the time to read the docs. So far, he is spot on. One vet to another, I have given him my time. Unfortunately, many won’t. He’s an American soldier that loves his country. Ultimately, our world may get to the point where we will truly need our Saviour to return to fight for us and rescue the remnant. Lord Jesus come quickly. Thank you for all you do for God’s glory. You are all appreciated greatly.

          1. For Catherine, I couldn’t reply to your last response, there was no reply button. I completely understand your position, thank you for your response. You are more than welcome to remove this whole thread and video. That’s ok. I totally understand your stance on using our energy and possible entrainment and the such. I remember you speaking on that years ago in a conference you were analyzing. I’m really not sucked in by emotions, if so, I would have lost it long ago with all this genocide and evil ramping up. Really, just seeking to make sense out of a nonsensical world. I truly feel like I’m walking around an open crazy house. Thanks again. I truly to appreciate your comments. Well said.

          2. If ok, will leave. If there are specific references in the video that you think are useful, post if you want. The nuggets are always thinks that can be independently reviewed.

        1. If you would, can you explain your position for not recommending? Sincerely. Also, I do not see a way for me to remove the video from the comments. Thank you Catherine.

          1. I can remove if you like me to. I would not do in this case without your permission.

            After a few minute I still have not gotten an introduction to who the speaker is and what is his background and personal economics and potential conflicts – basic info is not reviewed or disclosed. There are many basic things that a presenter can do to help you vet them. He does not do.

            So – speaker is stranger and I do not have what I need to vet him. I am just supposed to trust him?

            Feels to me that there is a reasonable chance that entrainment and subliminal programming has been overlaid. Hence, trying to watch it becomes very energy expensive. Even potentially dangerous if there is entrainment.

            The introduction is not respectful of the users time – potential giveway that this may be staged. So no reason for me to wait for the content. The stranger is not respecting my time, so I do not want to run risk or invest time because information that comes from people you do not know, can not vet or can not trust is not actionable intelligence.

            Historically, I have found that the time to get to prune out nuggets in cases with this fact pattern, turn out to be a poor investment of time.

            If I spent more time on this, it means I do not spend time on things that provide valuable actionable intelligence.

  7. The Norwegian Central Bank wants to test Ethereum as platform for their CBDC and now suddenly, Ethereum gets an update and reduces its energy consumption by 99,95%??:
    https://www.n-tv.de/wirtschaft/Kryptosystem-Ethereum-reduziert-Stromverbrauch-um-99-95-Prozent-article23591934.html
    Proof of stake instead of proof of work is supposed to be the difference…the Ethereum Foundation hosted an event called “The Merge” where this was presented.

    Norges Bank: https://www.norges-bank.no/en/topics/financial-stability/central-bank-digital-currency/

Comments are closed.