Theme:

The Coup Has No Clothes

Please login to see stories, charts, and subscriber-only content.
Not a subscriber yet? You are invited to join here!

79 Comments

  1. Thank you for the, as usual, very interesting summary. When you speak of moving ones cash away from central bank controlled institutions, what would be the criteria for assessing a financial institution as being un-linked from central bank control?

  2. what I find funny is the sleight of hand..co2 greenhouse gas..became the carbon footprint..stating the obvious but carbon is not co2 and carbon is not a gas so that has zero to do with climate..they push the zero carbon foot print agenda..we are carbon based life forms

    1. I also liked the subscriber asking local representatives about their carbon footprints.

      personally I would like to know the carbon footprint of all that missing govt money. how can we make sure it was embezzled with climate change in mind?

      carbon + oxygen make co2 so the surest way to limit carbon emissions is to limit oxygen use by the animal kingdom.

    2. Yes, Nicholas, you get the twisted logic of their propaganda. The word carbon makes people think of black, dirty coal and its pollution. Carbon dioxide is a trace gas in the atmosphere that’s odorless, colorless and essential for life on earth. They play on people’s total ignorance. I recently had an ongoing conversation with an admitted science know-nothing about agw. He insisted that “we are producing a thick layer of carbon in the atmosphere.” Not only had I never heard that claim before, I put it into a search engine there were no hits. He made that idiotic claim up out of whole cloth. When I told him what I just said here, co2 is a trace gas, odorless and colorless, his response to me was, “Where are your peer reviewed studies on that.” ??????? I said, “Go look at a high school text book.” In the end, he was more stalwart in his agw baloney than ever.

      Ugh.

  3. you mention informed consent..why not just issue the employer a conditional acceptance..that way you don’t refuse..after all its all business..just kick the ball back into their court

    1. That is clearly one way to go. Would need the individual to redo to take that approach since they would be agreeing to take it under certain conditions.

      1. yep…thats the whole point..the conditions laid out to the employer are such that there is no way they can agree..because they will be completely liable if they do

          1. yep…a water tight conditional acceptance is definitely required..when playing the serpents game

        2. Be aware that the employer might declare bankruptcy the moment you need support. You might need a transferable third party bond because vaccination is for life and a job isn’t. I’ll add this FYI.
          htt ps://rumble.com/vkwcb4-dr-dan-stock-specialist-in-immunology-and-inflammation-says-cdc-and-nih-is-.html

    2. Yes, conditional acceptance is how an old friend of mine from Canada got the government off his back when they wanted to go to his home and inspect his farming business. In the conditional acceptance he added that he had to charge the inspector $75/hr. for taking time out of his day to allow him on his property and show him around. It worked!

      I would also check in with Jerry Day, I am sure he may already have some boilerplate conditional acceptance. I mention him because Jerry would have a clause that says “if you refuse this conditional acceptance, you are admitting that this is a high-risk vaccine and indemnifying me of having to adhere to the policy”. In other words, Jerry will show you that if they just ignore your conditional acceptance, it is an admission of being wrong on their part.

      You could also tell them you will invoice them for the increase to your life insurance premium and if they do not pay in a timely manner you will pursue the matter in court.

      I mean you can really go to town to such an extent where they may back off.

      Don’t think this is too far-fetched, they are asking you to do something far-fetched so nothing wrong with responding in kind.

      1. Glad to hear it worked out for your friend….knowledge is power there is an excellent resource over here in blighty..”the peoples lawyer”..he’s got a slamming template for a conditional acceptance if you want to avoid the snake oil..I love it because this way you arent refusing anything..so legally you stand honourably

  4. John, the articles you highlight look so much better when you use reader view. is there a way annotate that view? the ads etc on the regular pages are evil/distracting

  5. China gets Hong Kong, Taiwan AND Australia. But their army will arrive down under wearing UN blue helmets…

  6. My sister and her husband they’re teachers, parents of 3 in Oklahoma and they did not received and have not received their tax return. This news may explain why.

  7. Catherine,

    Would you please consider a discussion or Q&A where you can elaborate on more detailed options on financial preparedness going forward? We have always homeschooled from the beginning, supported local farmers, grown some of our own food, have been 100% natural medicine driven, have not participated in allopathic medicine and don’t believe in debt. However, we fell for the 401k retirement ‘security’ trap. We still have 5 1/2 years before we can cash out of that without penalties and invest in real assets or start a business. Your advice on this area would be so appreciated. Thank you!!!

    1. Hi Laura, I am not Catherine, but I had heard from a US friend that there was/is some possibility to maybe get out of 401k (without the penalties or with less penalties) because of some provision around Covid-19? Some kind of “emergency exit”? Not sure of where to look for this, or if it still exists, may have been time-restricted in 2020- unfortunately, being from another country, I am not familiar with your system, just wanted to relay the info. I can ask my friend for details. Best regards, Dagmar

      1. Thanks Dagmar! Yes, the IRS waived the early penalty and allowed loans at very little interest against retirment accounts if you had been impacted by Covid. Our entire nest egg, including four children’s college funds are all in mutual fund retirement accounts (IRA, Roth IRA and just a tiny amount in actual 401k with my husband’s current employer). We are anticipating him losing his job over mandatory vaccine requirements being rolled out and wish we had some advice from Catherine on options we can take.

        1. Hi Laura, thanks for your reply, that was interesting! I hope you get e reply from Catherine, maybe you could send her an email directly? There was another thought that crossed my mind regarding the retirement accounts – what may be the actual loss if you took them out right now compared to if the dollar loses x% purchasing power over x years (until no tax loss)? Not sure if that is formulated right, it’s just that a thought. I wish you and your family well.

Comments are closed.