A Short Preview (Login to Access the Full Interview):

Theme: Don’t Believe the Backpedaling

Interview: 2022 Annual Wrap Up: Pharma Food with Elze van Hamelen

Take Action

Please login to see stories, charts, and subscriber-only content.
Not a subscriber yet? You are invited to join here!


168 Comments

  4. Catherine, considering all the new medical ICD tracking with meds, vaccines, etc; if WHO wants to control the population, how do you think veterans will be treated? or used? Gov could easily used veterans to enforce their mandates, which is one of the groups receiving the most incentive these days. If they don’t follow orders, they will be the ones discarded. Higher purchasing of guns is from the veteran’s group.

      1. Here are some interesting tidbits about anthrax from KLA.tv’s most recent Newsletter

        “The Anthrax Attacks – Pioneering Business Model
        The anthrax attacks set the stage for today’s biosecurity narrative. The U.S. company BioPort had a monopoly on the anthrax vaccine, made a fortune from it, and then called itself Emergent BioSolutions. Today, corona vaccine is produced there, for many well-known brands.
        As today with Covid19, back then with Anthrax-01 politics and the media played a very decisive role in convincing the population, firstly, of the danger of the disease in an alarmist manner and, secondly, of vaccination in the name of biosecurity. What began small and largely nationally limited with Anthrax-01, found with Covid19 an almost area-wide application. Accordingly, so did the gigantic returns of the pharmaceutical companies involved – a perfect business model.

        The Fairy Tale of the Lone Perpetrator in the US Anthrax Affair 2001
        After several people had been killed by anthrax agents in envelopes, suspicion was initially directed towards a group of perpetrators from abroad, especially from Iraq. However, after it was determined that the anthrax agents originated in U.S. laboratories, the search immediately turned to a lone domestic perpetrator. Bruce Ivin, a scientist and employee of a US vaccine company, was made the scapegoat. According to the U.S. media and authorities, Ivin then took his own life with paracetamol, which, in the opinion of medical experts, can largely be ruled out. One would have to assume a murder here. Significantly, no autopsy was performed at the time and Ivin’s body was notably burned in haste.

        Criminal Prior Knowledge and the Anthrax Vaccine Monopoly
        The pharmaceutical company Emergent BioSolutions had a monopoly on the anthrax vaccine. The company made a fortune on the incredibly quickly available vaccine after the anthrax attacks. The factories which had to produce it could not have been set up so quickly without criminal prior knowledge. One of the directors was Admiral William Crowe, who had been made the top U.S. soldier by Ronald Reagan. He was in charge of all US bioweapons and he could privately buy the vaccine manufacturer for anthrax. And only a short time later the anthrax attacks happened and the material came demonstrably from the US military, which was also admitted. Today, Emergent BioSolutions produces the Covid vaccines for AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Novavax and others. With this past business practices, can these companies and their products be trusted at all?

        The Anthrax Remedy Administered as a “Preventive Measure”
        Another important piece of evidence that there was criminal prior knowledge is provided by the physician Dr. Richard Tubb. He was personal physician to U.S. President George W. Bush and in that capacity he dispensed the anthrax remedy ciprofloxacin on the presidential aircraft Air Force One on September 11th – despite significant side effects – in the midst of the terrorist crisis. This demonstrates criminal prior knowledge because it was not until three weeks later that anyone could even know there had been a bioweapons attack. It was not until October 4th that the diagnosis of pulmonary anthrax came, which was also a medical sensation, as there had not been a case in the U.S. for 25 years. This was even publicly documented in Politico magazine.

        The Same Pattern: After Anthrax Came Corona
        In early 2013, Dr. Richard Tubb, President George W. Bush’s personal physician, joined the board of British American Tobacco (BAT). He transitioned the corporation to produce vaccines from genetically modified tobacco plants. Criminal prior knowledge again, for as early as December 16, 2019, BAT announced its plans to launch a “phase 1 trial” of its new Covid-19 vaccine in humans. The WHO, however, first announced proposing the name Covid-19 on February 11, 2020. Just “crazy coincidence” or “criminal networks” caught in the act?”

  6. There has since been an article blaming the FAA outage on contractors. Anecdotally, I was contacted by a third party recruiter for a very specialized programming job req with FAA just last month. The recruiter had advertised an undisclosed, but “high” rate in the listing. After much hemming and hawing it turned out that they couldn’t meet a rate that CBP was paying eight years ago. It’s hard to say whether the FAA are cheap bastards or some byzantine chain of intervening contract companies are scarfing up the payout, but sometimes you get what you pay for.

      1. Oh Catherinne, there is a lot of truth on your statement and I truly didn’t want to believe it myself. But after all my research and by experience, I must have to agree with your conclusion. And, I can add that the realization of “losing money or not making enough” makes things very painful and they will fight it to the end.

      2. Middle men are and have been siphoning off for decades, especially in IT. Every job has multiple tiers of contractors who subcontract to cub contractors of subcontractors before it gets to US worker. All money stays at top. It’s a form of corporate welfare. I make slightly more than my starting salary 35 years ago. And now have so much less buying power. 35 years ago I made more than twice as much and could buy the nicest houses in MontCo PA. Now I can’t afford anything.:(

  7. Would it be possible to get John’s take on the Katherine Watt / Sascha Latypova work? I.e. To what extent was C19 a military (or government) operation? In the M+M a couple of weeks ago he was sceptical ( that, for example, the courts had effectively been railroaded by the somewhat concealed legislation that Watt and Latypova had revealed ).

    Clearly, most countries passed new, emergency legislation. In Germany, we now have a completely bastardised “Infektionsschutzgesetz” (Infectionprotectionlaw), through which it was possible to strike off a (dictator’s shopping-list) of fundamental rights in the name of a pandemic, as well as outsourcing the basis for decisions to organisations such as the Robert Koch Institut (i.e. like CDC), which just happen to be private. Judges presumably had to follow these dictates. (Or else be struck off, as the lower-court judge in Weimar has been for trying to reverse orders to mask in schools) Etc. etc.

    1. I have asked Carolyn Betts to review their documents and analysis. Carolyn has significant experience with litigation involving both secrecy laws, classification interference, covert operations, etc. After she goes through it, I am hoping I can organize it so John and other attorneys can take a look without a major time commitment. Percolating….

      1. Thanks for your commenting Catherine. I have only limited experience of things legal, and have on a number of occasions been impressed with your and John’s ability to quickly spot when either things are way out of whack (e.g. Alex Jones “trial”) or what tactics are being employed (e.g. FTX paper deluge).

    2. Further to the last comment, a few news organisations (e.g. UK Column on 25th jan) have covered a FOI request to UK’s MHRA ( Medicines and Healthcare products Regulation Agency ) where the MHRA respond :

      “All the Covid vaccines and therapeutics authorisation decisions were taken by the Licensing Minister and were not delegated.”
      ( The licensing minister is the Secretary of State for Health )

      https://dailysceptic.org/2023/01/19/blame-game-begins-as-mhra-passes-the-buck-all-the-covid-vaccine-authorisation-decisions-were-taken-by-the-government-minister/?highlight=Nick%20Denim
      https://dailysceptic.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/FOI-22_1002-Delegation.pdf

      Watching the news as these products were licensed, there was never any doubt in my mind that they would be pushed through. Nevertheless, I assumed that organisations like MHRA were merely victims of regulatory corruption and capture. They certainly still acted (and certainly appeared in the news) as though board members of these organisations were still participating in reasoned review and decision making vis-a-vis the c19 injections. The head of the MHRA has even accepted the title of “Dame” (I.e. the female version of a knighthood, “Sir”) for her wonderful work. And now her organisation is saying they just rolled over and did what the UK government minister dictated. So, more like a pantomime dame.

Comments are closed.