84 Comments

    1. Don’t you feel safe that government takes care of everything?

      Meanwhile, US Index moves like bitcoin am FB like a meme stock.

  3. Dear Catherine,

    I’d love to know what you think of this. It is not too long. I have included an excerpt.

    Dr. Stefan Lanka Discusses The False Germ Theory and The Frauds Who Created It

    -snip-

    As well, Koch took dyes from the industry to stain bacteria, they acidified the tissue to colour it. They noticed that the staining killed the bacteria, making holes in it, then the bacteria would die. This is how antibiotics began by BASF, Bayer, IG Farben, Merck and so on using the dyes. So the pharmaceutical industry was contrived from the colourant industry based on the false infection hypothesis. The Americans copied the Germans assuming they had a greater knowledge, due to their expertise on the Haber Bosch process, which is taking nitrogen from the air. So why did the German government hire Robert Koch, when he had already fled Berlin after killing thousands with his “magic drug”, tuberculin, against tuberculosis? Otto Von Bismarck called him back because he needed a pretext against the British who had seized the Suez Canal illegally. Britain now had political and military advantages as they no longer had to sail around Africa, they could go through India and travel the calm Mediterranean bringing foods and spices back with them. So Germany wanted to make the allegation they were bringing smallpox, anthrax and the black plague from India. Thus quarantine was deemed and ports were closed to them and they were even shot at. Robert Koch was offered 100,000 marks to create the argument that people were carrying in these diseases.

    So how did the idea of a virus come about? Koch’s French counterpart was scientific fraudster Louis Pasteur. In 1870 the French were at war with Germany. The dead were later declared as the result of a smallpox epidemic. The Germans claimed it came from France and the French claimed it came from Germany. Pasteur, who knew from Bechamp what bacteria could and could not do, denied the knowledge, in order to go along with the Vatican church, claiming to have found the primordial creation, even though later he reversed his stance.

    He said this to become employed by the state. The disease spread and pandemic ideas were used politically to suppress upheavals, to control starvation situations, etc. and Pasteur was at the root of blaming the germ on disease causation.

    The early Vatican wanted to create the fear of diseases for their own agendas, claiming the disease is coming from the disease demon and is a punishment from God, similar to what the Greeks used. All for the agenda of control.

    So Pasteur was commissioned to find a way to prevent the English from traveling through the Mediterranean sea and he came up with the idea of a new pathogen that created illness and he called it poison, in Latin, virus. That was the idea, and he said it was 1000 times smaller than bacteria, saying they use such dense filters that bacteria cannot get through. So he pressed the liquid, the poison from a dead animal, through this filter, he injected it into the brain of a dog that is vertically tied to a pole, the liquid comes out of his ears, the dog convulses, barks, foams at the mouth and then dies. He called this rabies. This is what Pasteur did. He also claimed to have the antidote to the virus, to push the vaccine concept.

    This agenda was primarily propagated in France. The Germans had their antibiotics and chemotherapy. Pasteur committed fraud in all his undertakings. He was at least human enough to document all his deceit in diaries to parallel his lab books. He decreed that his family never release these books. Of course, his family became very wealthy from this. However, when his grandson died, these diaries were released to Professor Gerald Geison in 1993 and Princeton University.

    Geison translated the information and revealed the massive fraud Louis Pasteur had perpetrated on humanity. This was the model of illness held for centuries, which was really a model of war. It was not the model of nature, which is always a model of symbiosis.

    -more-

    https://yummy.doctor/blog/dr-stefan-lanka-discusses-the-false-germ-theory-and-the-frauds-who-created-it/

      1. Yes, I’ve read that book. It is very good.

        What I find intriguing is the political and war aspects of why we have a germ Theory. Theory should be capitalized. I also appreciated his siting of Goethe’s work on this matter. Dr. Lanka is a microbiologist who once called himself a virologist until he delved deeply into the science with his own work and found their “science” lacking to say the least.

        I find the history of the medical theory fits quite well with the present situation. I spoke to my niece in Belgium. She is very afraid of germs. So, now we have a very fearful populace. Scary, that.

        I’m afraid if the bogus germ theory is not exposed we are going to be in deep trouble.

        1. “In the nineteenth century, man lost his fear of God and gained a fear of microbes.” ~ Robert Koch

        2. Part of doing so is you have to expose all the chemical warfare, biowarfare and poisoning going on. Hard to out the cover story without outing the real story. I have found it often bogs down in the complexity – you are asking many experts to suddenly integrate what they know with scores of different expertise that they don’t know.

          1. Yes, I understand.

            I often feel for the young medical professionals who have no training in reality. Sad.

            I find it is much easier to move away from the prevailing paradigm when one has been seriously injured as I have and as you have. I had to find my own way to healing after being seriously poisoned in a lab. I am actually lucky because I left the system(or got booted out) before it was overtly criminal.

          2. > you are asking many experts to suddenly integrate what they know with scores of different expertise that they don’t know

            Classic cross-discipline teaching techniques, based on geometry, were revived by 1800 France’s precursor of modern-day MIT and will remain valuable in 2200, https://r.schillerinstitute.org/educ/hist/1997/bourbons_pbeaudry.html

            “It is as a result of the destruction of the Ecole Polytechnique’s national education system, that France lost its soul as a nation-state … From 1794 to 1814, the Ecole Polytechnique had become without any doubt the leading scientific institution in the world … The education program of the Ecole Polytechnique was based on universal principles which subsumed and linked together methods applicable to both Arts and Sciences.

            Its principal mission was to give the new Republic, as efficiently and as rapidly as humanly possible, scientists, and engineers to serve in public works, as well as in the military. Also required were architects, manufacturers, artists, physicists, chemists, etc.; and the polytechnique method of descriptive geometry, instituted by Monge, served as the theoretical and practical epistemological basis for that purpose …

            … the method of discovery was made accessible to every citizen, especially the poor and the orphans, in order to enlarge the pool of contributions that would be put at the service of the nation-state. Carnot made clear that this principle of education was not just for France, but for the whole world. “Elevate to the dignity of man every individual of the human species,” he wrote.”

          3. Teaching resources:

            Book: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Squaring+the+Circle%3A+Geometry+in+Art+and+Architecture-p-9780470412121
            Curriculum: https://math.dartmouth.edu/~matc/math5.geometry/
            Related: https://math.dartmouth.edu/~matc/eBookshelf/art/index.html

            “Geometry is a dynamic branch of mathematics that also serves as a creative tool for engineers, artists, and architects. Squaring the Circle: Geometry in Art and Architecture includes all the topics necessary for a solid foundation in geometry and explores the timeless influence of geometry on art and architecture. The text offers wide-ranging exercise sets and related projects that allow students to practice and master the mathematics presented. Each chapter introduces mathematical concepts geometrically and illustrates their nontraditional applications in art and architecture throughout the centuries. Appropriate for both basic mathematics courses and cross-discipline courses in mathematics and art, Squaring the Circle requires no previous mathematics.”

            From 2008, https://www.maa.org/press/maa-reviews/squaring-the-circle-geometry-in-art-and-architecture

            “Mathematics Across the Curriculum was a project at Dartmouth and other colleges whose aim was to introduce students to how mathematical ideas applied to other fields of study. A major goal of the program, funded by the National Science Foundation, was to encourage students to think mathematically about other fields of study, in part by encouraging them to use the mathematics they already knew, and in part by encouraging them to enroll in more math courses. Squaring the Circle was written as part of this effort: it integrates the study of geometry with the study of art and architecture.”

            A worthwhile and timeless addition to one’s print bookshelf.

    1. I really enjoy the warning to let your doctor know if you are allergic to the ingredients, when no one can tell you what the ingredients are.

  5. Came across this post by Edward Dowd on natural gas in Europe yesterday: https://gettr.com/post/p16ehnr4c50 – I am left wondering about the missing/little reaction of German industry vis-a-vis the energy shortages Europe/Germany may be facing from later on this autumn – what would the interpretation in light of that post be? Enough gas to supply exists, the question only is who is in possession of it? Am also wondering about the fact that 2-3 months ago, Germany was told their gas storage facilities were only filled 30-35%? Sounded weird at the time, such low storage in the middle of winter – could that post imply that the gas storage facilities were filled up more than that but the gas belongs to another buyer than the German energy companies/users? I am sorry I do not know enough about the natural gas market to make more sense of this, but I did wonder what Ed Dowd was trying to tell the public with that post…And I am wondering why German industry does not seem more publicly concerned about the implications of reducing the gas supplies.

    Any thoughts?

    Here is a 13/4-2022 interview by the recently appointed head of the federal net agency, the regulating body also for natural gas and energy, on saving energy and that food and pharmaceutical industries would be among the last to suffer cuts to their energy supplies if and when it came to that: https://www.n-tv.de/politik/Netzagenturchef-ruft-dazu-auf-weniger-zu-heizen-article23264673.html

    1. I wondering the same thing…perhaps the fix is already in, industries with clout have been reassured the gas will keep flowing despite the “war” and “sanctions”.

  6. I just finished listening to your interview on The Worldview Pioneer series and found it very insightful and inspiring. The one thing that stood out to me and I have been personally struggling with is the inability of regular people to stop being obsessed with acquiring at any cost. I have always been saying that we are not sufficiently evolved and do not deserve this world. I have consciously made the decision not to be financially rich because I refuse to compromise my values. Yet I feel wealthy beyond belief. We share this planet with all beings and its pity how much life, love and beauty we’re missing out on. I have been contemplating what would be the best solution. At one point I thought its best if we split the world but that will be short lived, because as you say they are not contract capable, or they will poison the environment. It was only in the moment I forced myself to love these people I was able to see the solution. It all comes down to animal instinct rooted down in fear(the squirrel instinct). We need a way to spread courage and to create a safe environment. I know its naive to believe that this is possible, but the majority of people are capable of being good if they are not being threatened, for the rest we can deal with like the Friesians did.

    1. Hi Marina, thank you for sharing your thoughts. I agree wholeheartedly with you in “we need a way to spread courage and to create a safe environment” and “the majority of people are capable of being good if they are not being threatened”. Yes. Let’s work at that. I wish you and your family well!

      1. Hi Dagmar, thank you, we definitely should do something about it. I wish the best for you and your family as well.

Comments are closed.