Money & Markets Report: October 7, 2021

Theme:

BofE to World: We Own You

Please login to see stories, charts, and subscriber-only content.
Not a subscriber yet? You are invited to join here!

165 Comments

  1. Was the Belarusian president’s statement from sept 2020, and not 2021?

    When I went to the site, it does say 2020, but seems a bit strange to have never heard of this then until now.

    Stay blessed 🙂

    1. Yes, it was Sept 2020, the story did circulate on alternative media sites at that time.

  2. Dear Catherine,
    I download on my phone money markets and wrap ups to listen to offline, but recently I began viewing you online. What kind of human are you that you can transmit so much energy, love, confidence, courage, and optimism through a screen?! You are a remarkable person who somehow is truly humble! In the end, I not only learn information from you, but much more: I am more gracious, patient and humble in my dealing with others. Catherine, thank you!

    1. Claudia:

      Thank you for the kind words. Just checking….Do you perceive any difference between on line and off line. Want to make sure that there is not an entrainment overlay on line.

      Catherine

      1. Catherine, I think you meant to write “NO” not “an” entrainment overlay on the line. I’m sure most realize that. Correct me if wrong.

      2. Though I do not deny that I am entrained or brainwashed, I can tell no difference.
        I recall years ago, I had only read the Saker. Then one day, he posted an interview with you which I downloaded. I was so eager to hear him but all I could walk away with was, “Who is this woman?” Your humility and sensitivity to go where he wanted to go were impressive. Later, when you commented on a show that the Saker had many commitments and would no longer record with you, I knew right away you were being gracious. I just think you have a way of saying SO MUCH in what you don’t. Another thing is, that because I’m a homeschool Mom with limited interaction with adults, seeing you and John was like sitting with friends. Again, thank you. Oh, and if I may ask:
        Is paying with my credit union debit/bank card count as paying with cash?

        1. Claudia:
          Appreciate your checking. You would feel a different between the two. If you don’t then unlikely.

          I value kindness and good manners. Being an investment advisor for many years reminded me of the extraordinary benefits to the health and success of family resulting from good manners and kindness. It was very sobering to observe.

          Life is hard – for everyone https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMbQwg4OroI

          I would say that paying with a good credit union debit card is close – still digital but a big improvement to most digital systems.

          Thanks again!

          Catherine

  3. Dear Catherine,

    I was really looking forward to John’s summary of the “global reset”. However I cannot find a link to it. Could you please provide me one. I may have missed it.

    1. Based on input from numerous scientists, I don’t post videos from Madej. Being cautious.

      1. Thanks for that data point. I’m also skeptical, but haven’t dug for supporting data. Was disappointed to see her as a prominent speaker in NYC rallies for medical freedom.

  4. Thank you both for the report. You are so on point Catherine relative to the inefficiency of electronic car technology. As you have stated, you grew up listening to your surgeon father’s take on the health industry, mine was an automotive wizard with a formidable command surrounding the automotive industry and the evolution of the automobile as we know it with internal combustion engines. He taught me two things regarding automotive transport, 1.) that much of the air pollution resulting from cars could be corrected by using improved fuels with i.c. engines, (so air pollution from cars has been greatly exacerbated by the global use of cheap fuels), & 2.)the only compatible power plant source for cars similar to the internal combustion engine would be hydrogen cell technology… that’s if you want cars to have freedom of movement which historically has been the norm. If a car’s movement is to be track-able, limited and manipulated, the alternative would be the highly inefficient, electronic power plant type option, dependent upon a grid, with high fire risk and huge future pollution issues due to the burial of used wasted batteries.

    1. 1. Petrol was chosen as the fuel for automobiles because the oil industry viewed it as a waste product. As long a crude oil is extracted and cracked, there will be petrol (gasoline)
      2. An old standard for comparing wheeled transport is litres per ton-mile. As far as I can tell, the battery doubles the weight of the car to achieve expected standards of range & mileage.
      3. renewables have ERoEI in the range 3~5 and first world civilisations need 11+
      so something has to give.
      4. In the UK they plan to connect EV chargers to the internet so they can be turned off depending on, for example, wind speed ….

    2. Great intelligence. Thanks, Cathleen! Yup, electrical cars much worse for environment. Just heard the nightmare story of trying to put out a fire of a blown up Tesla.

      1. No manufacturer is working on a new model of standard car. What it is on the street are last models.There will be only facelift for existing models from now on.
        Electric motor is much better than petrol engine. You have maximum torque from 0 rpm and 90+% efficiency. Battery is the big problem but I am sure a new solution will be released after they milk every dollar from existing technology. I also expect that new battery will require new car.

  5. Catherine is the only expert who has pinpointed with extreme accuracy the importance of the fact, that, if we lose our rights regarding “trial by jury” with all present in person — well, I shudder to finish that statement. If you watch this proceeding conducted without the judge, the witness, and the questioning attorney all being present in the same room, you will see that Catherine’s observations regarding same is VITAL going forward.
    Link is:
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/gPHyHRiuDpGa/
    Title of video is:
    DR. SHAH – DIRECTOR OF MAINE CDC – EXPOSED UNDER OATH!!!!

    The problems are immense, and under those “restricted and unfair” conditions, the questioning attorney did a memorable job. Problem One Out Of The Gate:
    Questioning attorney must know, not by the witness stating it, but by sight, WHO ELSE WAS IN THE ROOM WITH THIS WITNESS, HOW MANY COMPUTER SCREENS WERE IN FRONT OF HIM AT THE TIME HE IS TESTIFYING, WAS ANYONE LIVESTREAMING COMMENTS OR INSTRUCTIONS OR ANSWERS TO HIM ON SAID SCREENS.

    I would note also witness’s statement (made twice) regarding 400 million doses, that, going forward, the answer cannot be credible without witness stating how many of those doses were placebos. And when witness responds, which he will, that he doesn’t know; then, that “answer” is not credible, it is not factual, it is not, in fact, an answer, any longer.

    Truly Amazing that right at this point in history, we are going to do it by zoom.
    What a great and convenient coincidence.

      1. BTW – I can still get the video on bitchute – my VPN is on USA.
        (When I get the little guy with the swords, it’s time to reset / clear my browser and try again. Seems to happen frequently.)

    1. video is only nine mins and says it is a leaked clip from 10/8; it will probably disappear, which is the only reason I’ve posted it here at this time. Thank you, Catherine, for bringing forth what is going to happen if we are not back in open court.

      1. Wow. I can no longer view said video; the little guy with the swords drops down and it says “cannot process your request”.

Comments are closed.