Listen to the MP3 audio file
Download the MP3 audio file
Transcript:
Read the PDF of: Future Science Series: Medical Nanobots – Implications of the Wave Genome, Part I with Ulrike Granögger
“In thinking about nanotechnology today, what’s most important is understanding where it leads, what nanotechnology will look like after we reach the assembler breakthrough.” ~ K. Eric Drexler
By Ulrike Granögger
The specter of nanobots running through our veins has taken hold of people’s imagination as we learn more about the experimental injections being administered to the general population. Is this still science fiction or has it become reality? Why should we care? Catherine asked me to prepare a presentation on this topic as it is now critical to be nanotechnology-literate.
Nanoparticles have been around for thousands of years, but nanotechnology officially started in 1974. The term was used in Japan for the first time by Tokyo University of Science Professor Norio Taniguchi to describe the type of precision work done on materials within atomic-scale dimensional tolerances. Since then, the technology has given rise to nanorobotics, synthetic biology, injectable biosensors, and brain-machine interfaces. The information in this Solari Report is intended to help navigate some of the emerging questions about medical nanobots as well as possible future bio-digital scenarios.
After a brief overview of the scale and manufacturing methods for anything “nano,” I discuss a number of applications and technologies already in use to give a taste of what is possible and what may materialize in the near future. More importantly, we must look at the increasingly blurry line between biology and nanotechnology, and how this affects the electromagnetic field supporting all life forms. This is more than “just” gene-editing with CRISPR technologies or RNA injections. The decoding and manipulation of the epigenome (time) and the hacking of the morphogenetic electric field of organisms (space) depict the real possibility of harnessing the spatio-temporal intelligence of life into a “central nervous system of the earth” (CeNSE) or “Spatial Web.”
Want to be more nano-literate? Join me Thursday for this forward-looking presentation.
For Let’s Go to the Movies, I recommend this fascinating TED Talk, The electrical blueprints that orchestrate life, with Prof. Michael Levin speaking about “living robots” or “xenobots” and how close we are to manipulating the electrical blueprint of life—a metalayer of information that provides shape and function to an organism’s cells.
Stay tuned for Part II next week. After discussing the (more technical) elements of nano-bio-robotic developments and gene therapies, Part II will go into the question of what happens to the information and energy fields of a body or a species when it is altered on this fundamental level of the nanoscale. It is becoming increasingly clear that in addition to the double helix of DNA it is the epigenome (primarily associated with RNA) as well as the electrical fields of morphogenesis that hold the key to the next engineering breakthroughs. This is why the defense research agency is interested in epigenetic readings. And it is how a real internet of (energy) bodies will emerge.
For Part II, please make sure to watch the TED Talk by Prof. Michael Levin as recommended in Let’s Go to the Movies.
In Money & Markets Catherine and John Titus will review the latest financial and geopolitical news, and discuss what to watch for in 2021. E-mail your questions for Ask Catherine or post at the Money & Markets commentary for the first week of June here.
Related Solari Reports:
Special Report: Future Science – The Wave Genome – Quantum Holography of DNA with Ulrike Granögger
Related links:
Excellent, thank you so much for this fantastic series, which I would love to see on Solari more frequently, but maybe I’m being greedy 🙂
Well done and really interesting…but also terrifying! Thank you for your work… it seems that our God given cells are already perfect for bodily functions and these new robotic interfaces are merely a way of encroaching on the loss of our innate rights and privacy despite the small percentage focusing on health improvement. I hope I die before I become a robot…lol.
Sherri, So well-said. “our God given cells are already perfect for bodily functions” So true, so if we believe our bodies are wonderfully made, delicately put together, then we believe there is a “designer” at work who sees the danger of adding and subtracting to that beautiful design. A design that is the expression of a consciousness that cannot be duplicated by a machine. That’s the crux of the whole story. If you have faith that the design of your body allows you to communicate with your Creator there will be definite difference between you and the machine. Also, the very connection with the Creator is made possible by the design of the creature. Change the design and you block avenues to the Creator? I don’t think I want to chance that.
Historical note, Eric Drexler’s former wife was Christine Peterson, https://www.famousscientists.org/k-eric-drexler/
She is credited with coining the term “open-source” in the late 1990s, at Drexler’s Foresight Institute, https://opensource.com/article/18/2/coining-term-open-source-software
“In late 1997, weekly meetings were being held at Foresight Institute to discuss computer security. Foresight is a nonprofit think tank focused on nanotechnology and artificial intelligence, and software security is regarded as central to the reliability and security of both. We had identified free software as a promising approach to improving software security and reliability and were looking for ways to promote it. Interest in free software was starting to grow outside the programming community, and it was increasingly clear that an opportunity was coming to change the world. However, just how to do this was unclear, and we were groping for strategies.”
Suggestion: since my speaking cadence can get slow when talking about technical things, I suggest setting the video speed to the next level 1.25, still understandable and a little faster.
Bibliography in PDF will come with Part 2.
Just fyi I find it perfect the way it is.
I might be slow but as a matter of fact I actually have had to pause the video several times, and also gone back a few times already and I’m just over 30 minutes in as of yet.
Already fascinating thinking about the implications in combination with the two-head-worm-talk… Scary for sure. But also fascinating…
Thank you for being here enlightening us!
LOL
My comment is unrelated to this video but I can find no other means to contact Solari. I wanted to get a message through that I have utilized the Covid forms for educational institutions, provided by Solari report, at my daughters college, Penn State. The reaction is unfolding and the reaction of Penn State is astounding in what it reveals about the “educators” at Penn State. I would like to document what is happening, as a result of these forms, with and for Solari, but can’t find a way to get in touch. Can anyone assist me with a means to get in touch?
Hi! I sent a ticket to customer service on your behalf, I am sure they will get back to you.
Please comment directly about your experience on the Employer & School Disclosure Forms for Covid-19 Injections post located here: https://home.solari.com/employer-school-disclosure-form-for-covid-19-injections/
Carol:
Appreciate your documentation.
I watched a video prepared by a retired UK naval officer reporting with a family – two daughters whose father was killed by the vaccination. They described his informed consent. A 4 page document shrunk down to 1 page which was unreadable, given to the father after he was injected. Documenting the story will make a big difference.
Happy Thursday 🙂
Friend does dumpster diving for DARPA IP commercialization; when expressed thesis that Spike protein appears very similar to fractal antennae and the lipids encircling it can reorganize as single entity and attach to spike for OTA updates, he paused, then said “yes, that’s possible”
By genetically engineering assorted sequences into mRNA, which is, incidentally the only self-replicating molecule in biology, we find modulation of environmental signals and all bioenergetic processes.
The implications for the transformation of a species given the mutation potential are tremendous here. Given the globalist technocrat (Gnostic) strategy for the commandeering of evolution, we now have their mechanism.
This also implies that the propensity of Man to be expressed as variation (race, ethnicity, etc.) is reversible, because of the alteration to nucleic acids is effectively a standardization of the transduction of environmental information by all with altered mRNA.
Eventually all epigenetic consequences inherited by offspring in successive generations will yield the same outcomes. The forced close proximity of cultures clearly not compatible e.g. ‘immigration’ and subsequent race-mixing simply wasn’t working quickly enough for the stewards of monoculture.
Barbara McClintock et. al in 1984 suggested the DNA repair systems have dual functions: the first is to repair DNA damage through processes of (excision, re-linkage and recombination); but when under stress the repair system served the dual function of stimulating mutagenesis by allowing for the integration of DNA sequences such as transposons and viruses (foreign DNA including other DNA of other species) and, of course, GMO foods. This means the incorporation of any DNA concomitant with mRNA alteration and stress (adjuvant induced immune hyper-reactivity) both of which are claimed to be normal parts of vaccination.
Effectively homogenizing the herd post 21st century and placing the system in a position wherein any foreign DNA introduced would effectively be integrated into the genome under stress conditions, resulting in unimaginable degrees of phenotypic alteration and leaving the path for the creation of new ‘species’ of the formerly Mankind. The life process on the planet effectively becomes one large continuous experiment.
The creation of a blank human facsimile for the purposes of developing a cybernetic application over synthetic biology follows from the monoculture/monoethnicity.
Thank you for your Service 😉
Tabula rasa
just started reading “the next 500 years – engineering life to reach new worlds.” in it geneticist Christopher Mason lays out a 500 year 10 phase program to “engineer life so that it can survive” in outer space.
the thesis is, we have a duty to save the species from certain extinction on planet earth, and in order to colonize space, humans need to genetically engineer themselves to do so.
phase 1 is 2010-2020, the landscape of functional genomics. essentially laying the ground work. we are now on phase 2, preliminary engineering of genomes (2021-2040). phase 3, long term trials of human and cellular engineering will begin 2041-2100. around 2400 humans will attempt to settle new solar systems.
I have a feeling the timeline may be squeezed a bit on this. 500 years is too long to wait, given the political, social and environmental problems.
Very interesting. Thank you for the book review.
Well… I guess now I know my lifespan!
Ulrike, I am looking forward to the presentation.
“I sing the body electric,
The armies of those I love engirth me and I engirth them,
They will not let me off till I go with them, respond to them,
And discorrupt them, and charge them full with the charge of the soul.”
Walt Whitman, “I Sing the Body Electric”, 1900, “Leaves of Grass”
Marvelous passage from Whitman. Thanks for posting, Michael.
More reasons for walking barefoot in the grass.
Easier to achieve EMF grounding in a detached home, more challenging in an apartment.
Very apt. Also Robert Becker’s book with the same title. Thank you Michael.