Listen to the MP3 audio file
Download the MP3 audio file
Transcript:
Read the PDF of: Future Science Series: Medical Nanobots – Implications of the Wave Genome, Part I with Ulrike Granögger
“In thinking about nanotechnology today, what’s most important is understanding where it leads, what nanotechnology will look like after we reach the assembler breakthrough.” ~ K. Eric Drexler
By Ulrike Granögger
The specter of nanobots running through our veins has taken hold of people’s imagination as we learn more about the experimental injections being administered to the general population. Is this still science fiction or has it become reality? Why should we care? Catherine asked me to prepare a presentation on this topic as it is now critical to be nanotechnology-literate.
Nanoparticles have been around for thousands of years, but nanotechnology officially started in 1974. The term was used in Japan for the first time by Tokyo University of Science Professor Norio Taniguchi to describe the type of precision work done on materials within atomic-scale dimensional tolerances. Since then, the technology has given rise to nanorobotics, synthetic biology, injectable biosensors, and brain-machine interfaces. The information in this Solari Report is intended to help navigate some of the emerging questions about medical nanobots as well as possible future bio-digital scenarios.
After a brief overview of the scale and manufacturing methods for anything “nano,” I discuss a number of applications and technologies already in use to give a taste of what is possible and what may materialize in the near future. More importantly, we must look at the increasingly blurry line between biology and nanotechnology, and how this affects the electromagnetic field supporting all life forms. This is more than “just” gene-editing with CRISPR technologies or RNA injections. The decoding and manipulation of the epigenome (time) and the hacking of the morphogenetic electric field of organisms (space) depict the real possibility of harnessing the spatio-temporal intelligence of life into a “central nervous system of the earth” (CeNSE) or “Spatial Web.”
Want to be more nano-literate? Join me Thursday for this forward-looking presentation.
For Let’s Go to the Movies, I recommend this fascinating TED Talk, The electrical blueprints that orchestrate life, with Prof. Michael Levin speaking about “living robots” or “xenobots” and how close we are to manipulating the electrical blueprint of life—a metalayer of information that provides shape and function to an organism’s cells.
Stay tuned for Part II next week. After discussing the (more technical) elements of nano-bio-robotic developments and gene therapies, Part II will go into the question of what happens to the information and energy fields of a body or a species when it is altered on this fundamental level of the nanoscale. It is becoming increasingly clear that in addition to the double helix of DNA it is the epigenome (primarily associated with RNA) as well as the electrical fields of morphogenesis that hold the key to the next engineering breakthroughs. This is why the defense research agency is interested in epigenetic readings. And it is how a real internet of (energy) bodies will emerge.
For Part II, please make sure to watch the TED Talk by Prof. Michael Levin as recommended in Let’s Go to the Movies.
In Money & Markets Catherine and John Titus will review the latest financial and geopolitical news, and discuss what to watch for in 2021. E-mail your questions for Ask Catherine or post at the Money & Markets commentary for the first week of June here.
Related Solari Reports:
Special Report: Future Science – The Wave Genome – Quantum Holography of DNA with Ulrike Granögger
Related links:
Outstanding. Keeping us focused on the right things, in the right way, at the right time.
nanotech is a prison for biological life!!
Dr Ulrike Granögger’s presentation is fascinating, thank you
I just listened to Jean Thoby who measures electrical vibrations emitted by plants and trans-codes it to sounds… Older species emit more complex harmonics, plants in the presence of each other harmonize their wave emissions, they harmonize with us and modify their emissions when in the presence of someone ill who then feels better. The way plant fight bacteria, viruses, parasites is not by killing them but by learning to deactivate their negative impact on them through newly found wave emissions. Trees who are sick start by decreasing their leaves emissions (over 2000Hz). Dr. Levin’s presentation added a layer of understanding to this fascinating phenomenon, by taking it to the celular level. thank you.
That’s a great connection, thank you for making the link. I experienced the music of plants using one of these devices (from Damanhur in Italy) and what is interesting is that the “music” changes when you mentally interact with the plant. Of course, there is no way of proving that it is due to interaction, only anecdotal. I do wonder though what it does to an overall “harmony” of life if we begin to change these electrical biofields. That is why I find this type of epigenetic engineering more troublesome if you will than the Crispr techniques.
It appears Rosa Koire was right when she said their technology has caught up with their agenda.
Excellent, excellent job. Thank you very much for this. I feel my whole world has expanded.
I’m finding it very hard to start commenting on the Levin video, but I am extremely grateful for the reference. Fascinating, horrifying, curious all at the same time.
Fascinating in that it is another nail in the coffin of the primacy of DNA and genes. It seems like it should be the final nail, but I suspect that will not be the case.
I watched the video three times, trying to get a handle on what is underlying Levin’s (no intention to single him out) approach to Life. I can’t shake the mad scientist – “we do it because we can” explanation, reminded of Descartes’ vivisectioning, just at a more micro level. I certainly get no impression of the ‘happiness’ of the two-headed worms, they look lost.
I wonder what Steiner et al would think of this type of electrical manipulation. Steiner was definitive on the sub-nature aspect of electricity. Yet, we know that we have an endogenous electrical system now, and that it can be manipulated. Anti-life being used to manipulate Life?
When I watch this type of material, my mind goes to ways of building increasing resilience. How will we deal with shedding or transmission of synthetic biology? I think a valuable approach will be a better understanding of our Life body (ether body in anthro-terms) and how we can nourish it.
Lots to think about here.
I resonate very much with what you say.
Very timely and very scary. Thank you for the great backgrounder. Indeed: man-mad!
Is it possible to acquire a transcript of this and the upcoming talk? It would be fantastic if it could includes the slides and references. This information needs to be dug into thoroughly!