Solari Report
Invisible Weaponry
The Implications of Dr. Judy Wood’s Work
with David A. Hughes
“If you listen to the evidence carefully enough, it will speak to you and tell you exactly what happened.”
~ Dr. Judy Wood
Weekly Solari Report
Invisible Weaponry
The Implications of Dr. Judy Wood’s Work
May 13, 2025
Dr. Judy Wood’s groundbreaking work on 9/11 has not received the attention it deserves. David A. Hughes, PhD is trying to change that by publishing a series of articles in defense of Wood. In this interview, Hughes returns to the Solari Report to discuss the geopolitical and other major implications of Dr. Wood’s work on invisible weaponry.
Latest Money & Markets and Ask Catherine
Log in or subscribe to the Solari Report to enjoy full access to exclusive articles and features.
Already a subscriber?
Wow, I’m the patsy again! I thought I knew the truth behind 911…I had bought into the Thermite/Thermate story for years. This is one of the most amazing interviews ever on Solari. Such clarity and brevity. David Hughes is so articulate, distilling difficult concepts into easy to grasp layman’s terms…all spoken without ego in calm manner. Elze is a great interviewer, as well. Thank you, Solari!
Dear Elze and David,
The Truth Is Not Hidden – It Is Drowned Out by Thousands of False Narratives
The world needs to restoring the place of Dr. Judy Wood – we need to know what her work really means
She didn’t speculate about who – She Focused on What.
She didn’t chase suspects or motives.
She didn’t accuse governments, agencies, or factions.
She asked just one question:
What actually happened to the Twin Towers?
Her answer was simple in wording but radical in implication:
“They didn’t collapse — they disappeared.”
She didn’t follow politics or theories. She followed evidence.
Where others built stories, she stayed with the physical facts:
Why was there so little debris?
Why were nearby buildings intact while vehicles were scorched?
Why were people standing near the epicenter — unharmed?
Why was the seismic signature of the collapse virtually absent?
These are not ideological questions. They are forensic.
And they led her to a conclusion that made her untouchable:
A form of energy was used that does not exist in the public domain.
A Forensic Analysis That Undermines the Foundations of the Official 9/11 Narrative
Unlike many in the “truth movement,” Wood didn’t argue over politics.
She didn’t settle for thermite, bombs, or planes.
She analyzed the unexplained physical anomalies, such as:
Pulverized concrete — not crushed, but turned to dust mid-air
Melted cars with intact leaves nearby
Circular holes in buildings as if bored out from above
No sufficient seismic activity for buildings of that mass
Magnetic and radio interference during the event
Wood asked the forbidden question:
Is there a technology in use that has not been disclosed?
Her answer: yes — and it must be able to disintegrate matter without heat, pressure, or explosive force.
She called it “directed energy” — not as science fiction, but as scientific necessity to explain what we saw.
A Weapon Beyond War Is Also a Tool for Peace
This is where the true threat of Wood’s work begins — not for national security, but for the security of the current power model.
If she’s right — and much supports her analysis — then we must accept:
“What happened on 9/11 was not destruction. It was disappearance. Not collapse. But controlled dematerialization.”
That means:
War is not technologically necessary anymore.
Control over mass and energy is more advanced than we’re told.
The world we think we live in is artificially constrained.
In short:
Peace is already technologically possible. But it has been politically suppressed.
Why Her Voice Was Silenced
Dr. Judy Wood was not refuted.
She was ignored.
In academic terms, that’s called epistemic exclusion.
In human terms, it’s what happens when someone sees too clearly and too early.
She threatens not just the official story, but the structure of knowledge and control itself:
She exposes the limits of peer review in the face of state secrecy
She challenges both the mainstream and the “approved dissent”
She shows that truth may not be buried — just drowned in noise
The silence around her work is not evidence of its weakness.
It’s proof of its danger to war, secrecy, and narrative power.
Why Her Work Matters More Than Ever
Dr. Judy Wood deserves:
A place in any serious analysis of 9/11
A voice in the global conversation on suppressed technologies
Recognition for her scientific integrity, not ridicule
And most of all: respect for her courage to stand alone
She is a scientist who followed the data beyond the limits of what society was willing to hear.
And that is precisely why we must now help restore what was erased:
Discuss her book
Share her research
Challenge the silence
And reclaim the possibility she uncovered — the possibility of peace through truth.
Judy Wood’s work shows us that truth doesn’t always hide — sometimes it’s simply drowned out by manufactured noise.
Our choice now is not between belief and denial —
but between listening to the static, or finally hearing the voice that saw what others were told to forget.
Well put. Always seemed to me that Architects for 9/11 Truth was another version of the Warren Commission. Designed to deflect from the truth.
I haven’t watched this yet. However, I did read Hughes’ paper about Wood’s work.
One thing that hasn’t been mentioned yet, to my knowledge, including in Hughes’ Omniwar paper, are the many instances of the prevalent Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) that were used to start all of the anomolous fires, beginning, to my knowledge, in California in the fall 2017. We have the Paradise fires of 2018 and the Lahaina fires of 2023, and many other places in recent years, including in Oregon, British Columbia, Alberta, and Boulder, Colorado.
These DEW fires would completely destroy homes (which doesn’t happen in a normal wildfire) while leaving some structures right next to them untouched, including not burning the trees and shrubbery immediately adjacent to them. I believe this is the same kind of technology deployed on 9/11. I believe this needs to be a part of the conversation.
Below I will post a link, I previously found on the Solari website, showing evidence of this:
https://www.chemtrailplanet.com/DEW.html
Thank you for the link, Clint.
It was not discussed here because it was not part of David’s investigation.
One other piece that no 9/11 investigator, to my knowledge ever mentioned was Hurricane Erin, that was steaming up the east coast on 9/11. There was a complete media blackout around it and how it magically turned out to sea once it was needed to. A core essence of her thesis is that enormous electrical energy was needed to de-manifest the material in the buildings and what bigger source of electrical energy could be manifest on demand other than a hurricane.
The media blackout event, IMO, points to the culprits. Who owns the media, who had plans for a Greater Israel, and the destruction of what they term Edom? There you will find the culprits.
Thank you for conducting this interview. While it may have raised more questions than answers, I enjoyed it immensely.
Lots of clues found on this guys youtube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIBqO9RSf8w
Look what this guy has documented in his travels. From what I gather, he is a long haul trucker. Turn down the volume and look at what he is documenting. More clues of the same or a variant of the same technology. Or the tech gone wild! Field effects of using this tech all over the globe?
https://www.youtube.com/@jeffsnyder210
Ok, finally got to this. Been deep diving on this for 18 months.
– No, you don’t need large energy inputs to achiever over-unity.
– You can go beyond Schrödinger’s Limit – See Salvatore Pais’ work, patents and the superforce.
– Please have Bob Greenyer on the show in regards to cold fusion and LENR. You can see his channel at: https://www.youtube.com/@MFMP/videos
– Has the technology been shown anywhere else? Absolutely. The MH370 case blows this wide open. Don’t be deterred by the serial social media campaign to discredit it, follow the evidence and yes Ashton Forbes is a great person to have on the show and can teach about all these technologies: https://www.youtube.com/@JustXAshton/podcasts – The video evidence is real and undeniable.
Mini cold-fusion nukes is getting warmer. Some gaps in here but decent job. Nukes are obsolete. Love ya work David!
Please speak to these guys – very important work. Much love.