A Short Preview (Login to Access the Full Interview):
Theme: The Who and Why of Bank Troubles
Comments are closed.
Our mission is to help you live a free and inspired life. This includes building wealth in ways that build real wealth in the wider economy. We believe that personal and family wealth is a critical ingredient of both individual freedom and community. health and well-being.
Nothing on The Solari Report should be taken as individual investment, legal, or medical advice. Anyone seeking investment, legal, medical, or other professional advice for his or her personal situation is advised to seek out a qualified advisor or advisors and provide as much information as possible to the advisor in order that such advisor can take into account all relevant circumstances, objectives, and risks before rendering an opinion as to the appropriate strategy.
Be the first to know about new articles, series and events.
No products in the cart.
I’ve been hearing discussions about the existence of NESARA as well as bonds that were issued and traded with the creation of every birth certificate — money that will be returned to us in time. Is there truth to either of these? I’m new to the Solari Report and have been searching the library for past or more recent discussion or mention of NESARA and/or the bond/birth certificate issue but haven’t come across anything. Any reality to either of these?
My impression of NESARA/GESARA is that it’s fairy tales for adults.
Like the infamous Iraqi Dinar, https://home.solari.com/library/wp-content/uploads/2012/sr2012-02-02-04-ask_catherine.mp3
Yup. I think it got started by one person making a serious effort to propose real solutions, so the core material is worth reviewing.
Julia I have a good friend who believes in the whole deal. Sorry I don’t buy it. Over the last 3 yrs he has told me so many things that have not panned out. As Catherine has said the Right uses mind control just like the left. The Trump carrot on the stick is a great example of that usage in my opinion. Two things I use to help Always ask questions about stuff we don’t know and always build the bigger picture. One of the big reasons I love to pick Catherine’s brain and read her comments. So keep asking questions………we should all keep asking……..
I guess we’ll have to wait until next week to hear Catherine and John’s take on the Trump indictment. Is this a huge distraction? It looks like the calls to unite the Republican party around him will give him a clear victory. Unless there are surprises it doesn’t look like there is a real case there.
Is this a big distraction while these %$%^ steal our shoes while we are walking. Always suspicious when the news cycle focuses on a single issue. It looks like we are being distracted.
What else is going on while people focus their attention on the Trump indictment?
The other question I have is do they really hate Trump this much or is this the Hegelian Dialectic at work once again in the “s-elections”.
Dark Journalist has asked whether DJT’s uncle, John Trump, may be part of the reason for the animosity.
https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/PT.6.4.20181019a/full/
Rich, the John Trump part of this always makes me wonder. Especially since he saw Tesla’s work. I look at how President Trump conducted his 4 yr term, the people he picked, his pretty much total failure to shine with the Big V, lock downs and the jab. Today I lean more to he was just a rich country club play boy. Maybe I am wrong???? I just keep watching and building the bigger picture.
Steve Kirsch wrote a substack (& interview) about the paper Mark Skidmore published regarding Covid deaths, and is now being retracted by the journal who recently published.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/mark-skidmores-paper-showing-the?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=548354&post_id=111889186&isFreemail=false&utm_medium=email
Don’t understand Kirsch’s comment. The data provided by an anonymous survey can not be be independently investigated and corroborated. The paper should not be amended.
The journal has made it clear it is not willing to base its publications on facts and its stated peer review and publication process as opposed to politics. A great deal of time and effort was made over almost a year to make the survey politically acceptable for this journal for the initial publication. So is this really publication worth investing additional time and effort in?
There is a broader question here. When will choose to commit to transparency instead of sucking up to those who are killing us? At some point twisting ourselves into knots to please those who do not have integrity or are afraid or base their process on politics – whatever the reasons – is not an optimal use of our time.
Mark Skidmore strikes me as balanced, brilliant, reasonable, and calmly on point. Having survived in Academia as long as he has, I suspect he may have already come to similar conclusion(s), as to what you are saying Catherine. You have to admire his patience :).
Steve K. is an interesting character, and I appreciate his efforts & accomplishments too, however, he seems (IMO) too frequently tempted to provocation and devil’s advocate. That can be a waste of time and precious thinking time and space.
It did occur to me also that the “retraction” could end up giving more attention to the survey. It could easily backfire into greater publicity, as more and more are people seem to be paying attention.
That would be a wonderful outcome. Bound to happen at some point. Many of the best papers are being retraced.
I look forward to Money and Markets every week. And, I miss you and John during the off weeks! Especially during this volatile time.
Appreciate your patience in giving us a week to digest and think!
The world-class curation and synthesis of CAF and JT are indeed missed on the last week of every month. Perhaps we could start a tradition of using those weeks to contribute local intelligence and our own synthesis.
Writing can be a tool for clarifying thought and surfacing new connections (https://nesslabs.com/writing-thinking-tool) and breaking out of Truman Shows (https://youtube.com/watch?v=-_zYn-HHcyA).
Good idea. John and I both love the reports we get from subscriber – best actionable intelligence we receive.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rfnBQ0wYjHY&feature=youtu.be
https://tomluongo.me/2023/03/21/fdic-insurance-credit-suisse-day-fed-killed-europ/
https://www.patreon.com/posts/79871723
SVB eurodollar deposits in branches outside of the US (e.g. Cayman) were of course not covered by US FDIC. What were the relative sizes of the US vs. non-US depositor base? What percentage of non-US deposits were withdrawn before collapse?
An inspirational example of push back (hat-tip to UKColumn extra):
Colchester (UK) residents present solid research on EV’s at their local council meeting in a very calm, measured and polite manner, also reminding councillors of their “duty of care” and liabilities.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1b7nH8L5Ko
That’s a fantastic video, well done to the residents who brought such facts to the attention of their local councilors. I thought the body language of the panel was extremely arrogant and dismissive.