A Short Preview (Login to Access the Full Interview):

Theme: The Who and Why of Bank Troubles


139 Comments

  1. More news from Canada.

    Quite a number of NHL players have been refusing to wear Pride Jerseys and now, some of the NHL teams are opting out.

    They’re saying that hockey players are not activists.

    2. Feel free to email the legislators on the committee. At this point who cares if your not from Missouri. TN has a similiar bill just like it in the works. I hear the lobbists internationally have swooped down from their high perches to pound this bill from ever gaining traction. Missouri State BBB has already come out against it citing businesses would have to release trade secrets.
      From Missouri 🙂

  3. May I introduce the honourable Chris Hipkins (Chippie), prime minister of New Zealand. Here, answering one of the most complex and difficult questions a leader of such stature can possibly be asked in this year of ours, 2023.

    https://youtu.be/53ktY65eOdk

      1. Indeed!
        It is making the rounds on alternative media, but our local mainstream media ignores it as they do.

        1. They’ve actually now picked it up when it hit international mainstream like Fox etc. since its a bit awkward to ignore now. ?

    2. Turn off the sound and read the sign language by the lady to his left. Truly priceless. She must go home and have some really expressive conversations.

      My, my.

      2. I do love the way in which would-be tyrants (the “attack poodles”, as Catherine has amusingly referred to such folks in the past) including this new lightweight, as well as Ardern, Trudeau, Freeland, Andrews, Sturgeon, etc., seem to be under the impression that they can make the most oppressive and damning of pronouncements, but that their terrifying words are somehow absolved by the presence of a sign language interpreter.

        1. Attack poodles they are indeed. Lol!

          A sign language interpreter next to a speaker has become a sign to me I’m probably going to need a big sack of salt, not a grain, to process what I’m about to hear from them.

          1. Yep, exactly.
            “You can definitely trust whatever this weirdo is saying, they care about deaf people”.
            Er…

          2. Also, did you catch the line, “I wasn’t expecting that question, so it’s not something I’ve pre-formulated an answer on”?

            Wow. Modern elected officialdom. Summed up in a single soundbite.

          3. Yes. So embarrassing how he grasped at straws there. Sinking deeper with each sentence.

            I really wonder what his mum thinks about all this?

    3. If a “gender identity” value was to be defined for machines/robots, and humans can initiate a bureaucratic process to change the gender identity recorded in their central government identity database record, could a human choose to define their identity as a machine/robot? Or vice-versa?
      Why do the proposed world government/health treaties emphasize an equivalence between human, animal and environmental concerns? Could trans-gender obfuscation be extended to trans-species obfuscation, e.g. human-machine or human-animal hybrids?
      Carnival Row S1 visualizes some of these topics. Trailer: https://www.invidious.baczek.me/watch?v=369LHB9N-Ro

      1. I think the aim is to confuse and break down family structures for the next generation of children so they’ll be easier to control and manipulate.

        Postmodernism where everthing is relative, has that kind of chaotic result.

        2. Also avoidance of lawsuits and treaties on chemical pollution: https://theecologist.org/2008/oct/01/ch-ch-changes

          Environmental toxins have given us lesbian seagulls and transgender crabs, but pollutants may also be causing gender ambiguity in humans … In 1991, a group of scientists met in Racine, Wisconsin, to discuss the effects of living in what many describe as a sea of artificial oestrogens, and issued something called the Wingspread Statement …

          ‘Unless the environmental load of synthetic hormone disruptors is abated and controlled, large-scale dysfunction at the population level is possible’ – which would seem to imply that social sexual choices and behaviour could be affected by exposure.

          … Five years later, Theo Colborn, Dianne Dumanoski and John Peterson Myers came out with the book Our Stolen Future, establishing that hormone effects were not only well-documented, but also subtler and more widespread than anyone had anticipated.

          What would the original Malthusians have thought about chemical disruption, living standards and population growth? From “Farewell to Arms”: https://faculty.econ.ucdavis.edu/faculty/gclark/Farewell%20to%20Alms/FTA-chapter2.pdf

    4. I just love watching the sign language… her signals and expressions say everything you need to know on the topic ???

  4. Peggy Hall making some great points about sniffing out Fakers/Phones/Controlled Opp. I know from personal experience that there are MANY…Some are fairly obvious after a little research and thought and you will say, I Should have seen that.” Others will lead you to the Dark Night of the Soul. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZMERzC31mU

  5. Beware local building code changes. Local authorities are pushing new building codes which require the builder to install car charging stations for all new homes. No wood stoves or gas stoves allowed.

    Denver is limiting the number of gas stations to force people into electric cars.

  7. Looking back at the 1999 WTO/globalization protests in Seattle. Might be good to stitch these into one video and host a backup. Youtube has a 1-hour subset of the 125 min total.

    https://archive.org/details/ddtv_186_a_showdown_in_seattle https://archive.org/details/ddtv_186_b_showdown_in_seattle https://archive.org/details/ddtv_186_c_d_showdown_in_seattle https://archive.org/details/ddtv_186_d_showdown_in_seattle https://archive.org/details/ddtv_186_e_showdown_in_seattle

    From a 2015 review of the similarly-named Hollywood movie,
    https://www.amazon.com/Battle-Seattle-Blu-ray-Andr%C3%A9-Benjamin/dp/B001O5LVVM/

    at the time of the protest, the only protestors committing acts of violence and vandalism were uniformly dressed in black with their faces concealed. They were voiceless, violent, and still seem to be as unaccountable now as they were at the time of the Seattle protest. In this movie, they were made to seem like real protestors with real voices, but that’s not how it actually was. The real protestors were trying to stop these athletes in black, if anything, while asking why were they being violent when it was a peaceful demonstration, etc. The heavy-handed police retaliation began only as a response to the few violent ‘protestors’, oddly all physically very fit and athletic and in their late twenties and early thirties. Odd about their consistency, isn’t it? And if they had been real protestors, why would they have remained silent, instead of singing protests, carrying signs and/or sitting like typical protestors? No, they were too busy destroying things and then vanishing into thin air, as though they had completed a mission. Anyone curious?

Comments are closed.