Money & Markets Report: April 6, 2023


A Short Preview (Login to Access the Full Interview):

Theme: The Who and Why of Bank Troubles


139 Comments

  2. I look forward to Money and Markets every week. And, I miss you and John during the off weeks! Especially during this volatile time.

      1. Good idea. John and I both love the reports we get from subscriber – best actionable intelligence we receive.

    1. Don’t understand Kirsch’s comment. The data provided by an anonymous survey can not be be independently investigated and corroborated. The paper should not be amended.

      The journal has made it clear it is not willing to base its publications on facts and its stated peer review and publication process as opposed to politics. A great deal of time and effort was made over almost a year to make the survey politically acceptable for this journal for the initial publication. So is this really publication worth investing additional time and effort in?

      There is a broader question here. When will choose to commit to transparency instead of sucking up to those who are killing us? At some point twisting ourselves into knots to please those who do not have integrity or are afraid or base their process on politics – whatever the reasons – is not an optimal use of our time.

      1. Mark Skidmore strikes me as balanced, brilliant, reasonable, and calmly on point. Having survived in Academia as long as he has, I suspect he may have already come to similar conclusion(s), as to what you are saying Catherine. You have to admire his patience :).
        Steve K. is an interesting character, and I appreciate his efforts & accomplishments too, however, he seems (IMO) too frequently tempted to provocation and devil’s advocate. That can be a waste of time and precious thinking time and space.
        It did occur to me also that the “retraction” could end up giving more attention to the survey. It could easily backfire into greater publicity, as more and more are people seem to be paying attention.

        1. That would be a wonderful outcome. Bound to happen at some point. Many of the best papers are being retraced.

  4. I’ve been hearing discussions about the existence of NESARA as well as bonds that were issued and traded with the creation of every birth certificate — money that will be returned to us in time. Is there truth to either of these? I’m new to the Solari Report and have been searching the library for past or more recent discussion or mention of NESARA and/or the bond/birth certificate issue but haven’t come across anything. Any reality to either of these?

    1. Julia I have a good friend who believes in the whole deal. Sorry I don’t buy it. Over the last 3 yrs he has told me so many things that have not panned out. As Catherine has said the Right uses mind control just like the left. The Trump carrot on the stick is a great example of that usage in my opinion. Two things I use to help Always ask questions about stuff we don’t know and always build the bigger picture. One of the big reasons I love to pick Catherine’s brain and read her comments. So keep asking questions………we should all keep asking……..

    2. My impression of NESARA/GESARA is that it’s fairy tales for adults.

      1. Yup. I think it got started by one person making a serious effort to propose real solutions, so the core material is worth reviewing.

  5. Looking back at the 1999 WTO/globalization protests in Seattle. Might be good to stitch these into one video and host a backup. Youtube has a 1-hour subset of the 125 min total.

    https://archive.org/details/ddtv_186_a_showdown_in_seattle https://archive.org/details/ddtv_186_b_showdown_in_seattle https://archive.org/details/ddtv_186_c_d_showdown_in_seattle https://archive.org/details/ddtv_186_d_showdown_in_seattle https://archive.org/details/ddtv_186_e_showdown_in_seattle

    From a 2015 review of the similarly-named Hollywood movie,
    https://www.amazon.com/Battle-Seattle-Blu-ray-Andr%C3%A9-Benjamin/dp/B001O5LVVM/

    at the time of the protest, the only protestors committing acts of violence and vandalism were uniformly dressed in black with their faces concealed. They were voiceless, violent, and still seem to be as unaccountable now as they were at the time of the Seattle protest. In this movie, they were made to seem like real protestors with real voices, but that’s not how it actually was. The real protestors were trying to stop these athletes in black, if anything, while asking why were they being violent when it was a peaceful demonstration, etc. The heavy-handed police retaliation began only as a response to the few violent ‘protestors’, oddly all physically very fit and athletic and in their late twenties and early thirties. Odd about their consistency, isn’t it? And if they had been real protestors, why would they have remained silent, instead of singing protests, carrying signs and/or sitting like typical protestors? No, they were too busy destroying things and then vanishing into thin air, as though they had completed a mission. Anyone curious?

Comments are closed.