A Short Preview (Login to Access the Full Interview):
Theme: DOD: What Are We Getting for Our Money?
Ask Catherine can be found here.
Interview: Solution Series: Building Wealth with Catherine Austin Fitts and Ricardo Oskam
Take Action
Please login to see stories, charts, and subscriber-only content.Not a subscriber yet? You are invited to join here!
18:00 re: Maui — if internet and cell services were taken offline, if no evacuation instructions were given, if no warnings were given, then it’s intentional mass murder, possibly to stop the residents claiming insurance and rebuilding.
Same thing crossed my mind. They needed those people dead. How many properties will go into probate with off-island extended family as the only next of kin?
https://sfstandard.com/2023/08/17/in-california-insurance-crisis-puts-homeownership-further-out-of-reach/
https://sfstandard.com/2023/08/14/gumps-owner-slams-san-francisco-in-letter-downtown-crime-homeless/
As per the article from the first link above,
“If we want companies to be back in higher-risk areas sooner, we have to have a mechanism for them to charge rate levels that serve high-risk communities,” Frazier said. “The longer it takes to get to that rate level, the longer it will take for the market to rebound and for [insurance] availability to improve.”
Mr. Frazier is 100% correct. As risk increases, such as increased annual wildfires, the cost to mitigate that risk also increases. One might ask how has our Insurance Commissioner in CA been interfacing with the insurance companies which have pulled out of CA? Were rate increases discussed…did any negotiation result? As a retried 25 year insurance agent in California, the insurance markets fluctuate. It’s the nature of the business, however, I never saw such a hard line from many of the insurance companies which have recently announced their withdrawals from this state. I have to wonder if California is not agreement capable as Catherine so often points out is the case at the Federal Level.
Good points. I worked in San Francisco for over 30 years and lived in Mill Valley for 34 years. My husband and I moved out of CA in 2018 to a conservative town in Western NY, my hometown. People here live in reality. We were subjected to deep state tactics, and my intuition was screaming that we leave. It is such a beautiful area but a dark cloud descended after 2000. I don’t own any property there but keep up with the apparent destruction going on in the Bay area like the stand down order on crime. We were able to move since we’re retired with no children, family or business commitments in CA.
If I was an insurance company, I would hard line out of California. Question is whether they are anticipating a wave of highly expensive fires.
I would like to share Reinette Senum’s Foghorn Express Substack video “Lahaina–A Modern Day Pearl Harbor”. She had a pass to enter after Katrina and shares her story connecting with an oil heiress who lost her property, then her experiences with Paradise and Santa Rosa, her conclusion “this is war” along with footage and advice.
https://reinettesenumsfoghornexpress.substack.com/p/lahaina-a-modern-day-pearl-harbor?fbclid=IwAR0zLob2Copb-VMwGUfzBqsf6_XhLl7QDW3KtjhaQ9nhgSfo4JB-29SFAHs
Also sharing from Jaime, former Wall Streeter, of “Aplanetruth” who lives in Mendocino County whose website covers DEW footage along with hidden history. Sofia Smallstorm has been on his podcasts. The people know. ??
https://youtu.be/hVDpv-t7ZoU
“It’s a Uniparty system with 2 flavors that are both poison.”
100%
https://forourrightsnewsletter.ck.page/posts/lahaina-dustified-what-is-really-going-on?
Catherine, hear what you are saying about the “rape of Russia” but what is the solution in your opinion? it seems to me as long as we have a Fed, we’re in trouble.
The Federal Reserve System is far too lucrative for the criminals to give up control, on the contrary they want more and more. Now they want the whole pie.
The Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services recently proposed to amend IDEA Part B regulations “to remove the requirement for public agencies to obtain parental consent prior to accessing for the first time a child’s public benefits or insurance to provide or pay for required IDEA Part B services.” Mary Byrne, Ed D, alerted me to this and explained this means the agencies can treat the child without parental consent. It’s deviously written – “accessing the child’s benefits” means treating.
Mary is a tireless advocate in the area of education. She’s fought Common Core and recently founded the Educated Citizens Project. ecp.org (That’s just the tip of the iceberg of all her efforts. If you see articles written by Mary, they’re well worth reading as she knows her topic and does the research.)