A Short Preview (Login to Access the Full Interview):

Theme: Ukraine Fever

Interview: 2nd Quarter 2023 Wrap Up: News Trends & Stories, Part II with Dr. Joseph P. Farrell

Take Action

Please login to see stories, charts, and subscriber-only content.
Not a subscriber yet? You are invited to join here!


126 Comments

    1. As Catherine points out, Sturgeon is one of those characters (such as Walensky, Fauci, Ardern, Johnson, et al) who had utterly exhausted their political capital during Covid, and needed to be replaced before the next psy-op.

      Sturgeon facilitated a similar genocide to Matt Hancock and Chris Whitty in England, and Andrew Cuomo in New York. Midazolam administered to euthanize the elderly in the care homes, under the cover of “mistakes were made”.

      I wonder if the timing is at least in part to take the heat off Sturgeon’s utterly clueless replacement, Humza Yousaf, who recently revealed himself to be an out-and-out racist.

      1. Indeed. I phrased it poorly, meaning it is astonishing that there may be a crack in the “mistakes were made” facade. Sturgeon vulnerable on a few fronts, and facing allegations of financial shenanigans, but if this line of attack sticks , it exposes a flank for many European, North American and Australasian technocrats and politicians of the last 3 years.

        1. Agreed. I can’t believe it’s even being reported on. Although, like you, I’d be amazed if it actually ended up in criminal prosecutions.

          I get the feeling Sturgeon thought she was a genuine insider until recently.

          My own experience of the UK’s NHS is horrendous. It appears to be a gigantic money laundering operation, costing British taxpayers ~£3,000,000,000 per week, provides generally atrocious healthcare, and has been euthanizing vulnerable patients with Midazolam for years. At the same time as being hailed by the British media as a paragon of virtue, beyond reproach, etc. Yuck.

  2. Question for John Titus. John said that only the FED can increase the amount of dollars in circulation. So I had this thought. Say an Argentinian bank loans someone a million pesos to buy a house and demands that he pays back 4000 US dollars. The bank can then trade the $4000 debt with other banks. What do you think of this method to increase the amount of dollars in circulation?

    1. I was under the impression that US-based commercial banks create the vast majority of USD in circulation (some 97%). The Fed issuing its paper notes makes up the balance (i.e., ~3%).

      I thought John said that The Fed was “one of the influences” on the amount of USD in circulation. What he was adamant about was that other countries’ central and commercial banks have zero ability to add to the global supply of USD.

      Someone please correct me if I’m wrong.

    2. what John said was that the central bank of each country is responsible for the supply of its currency, and no other bank can create/issue that currency. when an international counterpart trades in USD, there is a middleman bank which converts that international currency into USD, but the USD is not created, just diverted from the current supply.

  4. Hi Catherine and John,

    Just received an email from a friend. Said that Wikileaks just dumped all their files. Cut and paste below –

    ????????????. Wikileaks just dumped all of their files online. Everything from Hillary Clinton’s emails, McCain’s being guilty, Vegas shooting done by an FBI sniper, Steve Jobs HIV letter, PedoPodesta, Afghanistan, Syria, Iran, Bilderberg, CIA agents arrested for rape, WHO pandemic. Happy Digging! Here you go, please read and pass it on….. 

    https://file.wikileaks.org/file/
    … These are Clinton’s emails: 

    https://file.wikileaks.org/file/clinton-emails/
    Index file!   

    https://file.wikileaks.org/file/?fbclid=IwAR2U_Evqah_Qy2wxNY12FMqFC5dAFUcZL5Kl4FIfQuMFMp8ssbM46oHXWMI

    2. Sorry, I believe this is an old news rehash. I could not find it any where in a search. Next time, I will make a search before posting.

  5. Catherine & John, not sure you will cover the surprising news from candidate Kennedy Jr. that he will back the US Dollar with Bitcoin currency.

    First he said he was not an investor in bitcoin, now there are news he actually owns bitcoin. It turns out now that “backing the US dollar is necessary by an asset not back by anything physical and being purely DIGITAL” Impressive. In your view, doesn’t bitcoin helps in the construction of a digital grid or concentration camp? I am sure that the EU will be happy to bac Kennedy. I still can’t believe it — but here we are.

    After hearing from you and Solari about buying “Gold, Silver and physical assets” and using our cash to protect our wealth, how is Bitcoin playing in your foresight of the economic future and opportunities for the general public? Do you still support Kennedy Jr. as a candidate based on his announcement?

    I am beginning to believe that 90%+ of all news are purely speculation, while they charge incredible fees to give partial and bias information. Then, WEALTH is made from others lack of education. Hope people realize it soon.

    We are living unique times, indeed!

    1. What Kennedy is suggesting does not make sense. Not sure I understand it or why he is proposing it. In the process of trying to find out what he is specifically proposing before I comment.

    2. He also stated that Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk should be beacons of hope in the freedom community for their commitment to free speech, demonstrated by their personal sacrifices and no one should believe otherwise (paraphrased) … I mean where does one even begin on this! All the evidence points to the contrary! There are many unanswered questions about RFK jr and some major alarm bells imo.

Comments are closed.