Money & Markets Report: July 20, 2023


A Short Preview (Login to Access the Full Interview):

Theme: Ukraine Fever

Interview: 2nd Quarter 2023 Wrap Up: News Trends & Stories, Part II with Dr. Joseph P. Farrell

Take Action

Please login to see stories, charts, and subscriber-only content.
Not a subscriber yet? You are invited to join here!


126 Comments

  2. Question for John Titus. John said that only the FED can increase the amount of dollars in circulation. So I had this thought. Say an Argentinian bank loans someone a million pesos to buy a house and demands that he pays back 4000 US dollars. The bank can then trade the $4000 debt with other banks. What do you think of this method to increase the amount of dollars in circulation?

    1. what John said was that the central bank of each country is responsible for the supply of its currency, and no other bank can create/issue that currency. when an international counterpart trades in USD, there is a middleman bank which converts that international currency into USD, but the USD is not created, just diverted from the current supply.

    2. I was under the impression that US-based commercial banks create the vast majority of USD in circulation (some 97%). The Fed issuing its paper notes makes up the balance (i.e., ~3%).

      I thought John said that The Fed was “one of the influences” on the amount of USD in circulation. What he was adamant about was that other countries’ central and commercial banks have zero ability to add to the global supply of USD.

      Someone please correct me if I’m wrong.

    1. As Catherine points out, Sturgeon is one of those characters (such as Walensky, Fauci, Ardern, Johnson, et al) who had utterly exhausted their political capital during Covid, and needed to be replaced before the next psy-op.

      Sturgeon facilitated a similar genocide to Matt Hancock and Chris Whitty in England, and Andrew Cuomo in New York. Midazolam administered to euthanize the elderly in the care homes, under the cover of “mistakes were made”.

      I wonder if the timing is at least in part to take the heat off Sturgeon’s utterly clueless replacement, Humza Yousaf, who recently revealed himself to be an out-and-out racist.

      1. Indeed. I phrased it poorly, meaning it is astonishing that there may be a crack in the “mistakes were made” facade. Sturgeon vulnerable on a few fronts, and facing allegations of financial shenanigans, but if this line of attack sticks , it exposes a flank for many European, North American and Australasian technocrats and politicians of the last 3 years.

        1. Agreed. I can’t believe it’s even being reported on. Although, like you, I’d be amazed if it actually ended up in criminal prosecutions.

          I get the feeling Sturgeon thought she was a genuine insider until recently.

          My own experience of the UK’s NHS is horrendous. It appears to be a gigantic money laundering operation, costing British taxpayers ~£3,000,000,000 per week, provides generally atrocious healthcare, and has been euthanizing vulnerable patients with Midazolam for years. At the same time as being hailed by the British media as a paragon of virtue, beyond reproach, etc. Yuck.

  4. Seems the mp3 download link is pointing to last week’s discussion. Can Solari take a look?

  5. So ImmuneProfile was recommended to test for immunity (MMR, Hep A, Hep B etc). Have you heard of this?
    I purchased the kit but now am thinking that maybe I don’t want ‘whomever’ to know this information. Could my immunities be a target for harm or am I being paranoid?

    1. Somebody just needs to roll a shiny gold round into the coin slot on the back of his neck and he’ll fire back up again.

  7. Was this an exclusive freedom rally? What was the speaking points of this rally? Where was it announced?

Comments are closed.