49 Comments

1. Here is an article that ties in with your discussion of stock buybacks.

   https://starkmanapproved.com/ceos-and-the-4-8t-looting-of-corporate-america/

2. Great humanitarian dies @ 71 (irony)
   https://meidasnews.com/news/sen-lindsey-graham-dead-at-71

   1. I am curious how that happened. He’s the top warhawk in Congress.

3. Here is a brilliant 9-minute video, where a younger John Rappoport explains the HIV/AIDS hoax, which also exposes the plandemic playbook, many years before the Covid Op:
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_nDd9sOqLk

   Taken from Celia Farber’s substack:
   https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/farewell-to-a-friend-ally-war-buddy

4. William Stuart details the Central Banking Cabal’s operations over the centuries in “The Invisible College – The Great European Secret.”

   The House of Representatives has the power to devalue the US currency because of the phrase, “To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof.” The Framers gave Congress the power to change the form of money with the phrase, “current coin of the United States.”

   The Framers did not force the federal government to make gold or silver legal tender.

   The States cannot issue anything except gold or silver as money. “No State shall emit Bills of Credit; make any thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts;”

   Americans can minimize the central bank’s power by maintaining minimal USD balances and exchanging their Federal Reserve Notes for hard physical assets. Stocks, bonds, IRAs, 401Ks are choices not requirements.

   1. Is this what all of you are doing?

5. Tom Bilyeu explains what’s happening in the gold market:
   “China Says They Shut Down Gold Trading To Protect You — That’s Not Why
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJQjpYMXfKE

   How The Dutch Lost Their Empire. And Why The US Is Next:
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1rp1fj5n0w
   (The producer, Uncover History, has several other interesting documentaries.)

6. The more I listen to your analyses, the more I feel that we need to re-examine some of our most fundamental assumptions about what it means to be human.

   I increasingly wonder whether projects such as MKUltra and the work of Sidney Gottlieb reached far beyond behavioural experimentation. Their greatest legacy may not only be the immense human suffering they caused, but what they revealed: how profoundly human perception can be altered and therefore how malleable our experienced reality can become.
   This realization led me to a different question. What if conscience is fundamentally biological?

   We usually describe conscience as something shaped by education, religion, culture or law. But what if these are merely frameworks — and sometimes even distortions — of a much older biological capacity? What if conscience is always already present: an innate biological property that becomes accessible through healthy sensory functioning?

   Healthy sensory functioning does more than collect data. It is the biological gateway through which both consciousness and an innate biological conscience are revealed — an embedded feedback mechanism that, through various adaptations and interferences, may now be partially impaired or redirected.

   When we truly see, hear, touch, smell and taste, we enter into direct relationship with living reality. Through our senses we continuously perceive not only the world, but also the consequences of our own actions. In this way, healthy sensory functioning keeps us in constant, embodied dialogue with other forms of biological life.

   Conscience, then, is not a collection of moral rules. It is a biological navigation system whose deepest function is to enable an organism to navigate reality in such a way that the flourishing of one does not require the diminishment of another. It orients life toward relationships that remain mutually life-supporting.

   If this is true, history begins to look very different.
   It seems as though our biological conscience gradually became externalized. Instead of trusting what healthy sensory functioning could reveal, conscience was relocated into religions, ideologies, legal systems, institutions and, today, algorithms. This shift may even have distorted our direct experience of reality itself, including our understanding of what God is?

   Every civilization operates from a coding, whether consciously recognized or not. Ours has increasingly encoded progress in terms of extraction, competition and domination — the assumption that growth must come at the expense of something or someone else. Yet living systems operate according to a different principle: continuous reciprocity, exchange and dynamic balance, in which the flourishing of one often supports the flourishing of many.
   Today almost every biological experience has a synthetic counterpart. We see the world through screens instead of with our own senses. We listen to algorithms and digital information instead of one another. Connection is replaced by social media, love by pornography, learning by standardized systems, presence by simulation, relationship by artificial intelligence.

   When the senses — the very gateway to biological conscience — are progressively filtered, redirected and replaced by synthetic representations, the question arises whether our access to this inner navigation system is also being altered, diminished or redirected.

   This may explain the central paradox of our age: never before have we possessed such extraordinary technological power, and never before have we been able to influence planetary life on such a destructive scale. Those in power often interpret this trajectory as progress. We are beginning to see what that vision is accelerating into.

   Technology is never created in isolation. It is the material expression of the assumptions a civilization encodes into its understanding of consciousness, life and reality.

   What if a fundamental shift in our understanding of consciousness and biological conscience could change the entire coding of civilization? What if it gave rise to a different forms of education, economics, medicine, agriculture, architecture and governance — and ultimately a different civilization?

   Perhaps the defining challenge of our time is not artificial intelligence itself, but whether humanity can rediscover and re-embody the biological conscience that life has been refining through healthy sensory functioning — and from that new coding, develop ways of living in which the flourishing of one no longer requires the diminishment of another.

   Genuine progress may ultimately be measured by the quality of that biological conscience and its relationship to technology. Only then can we truly cultivate our civilization, our relationships with one another, with other forms of life, and with the living world itself.

7. “Ross Perot Warned Us 33 Years Ago”. Fact:
   https://youtu.be/Qsow_i13WpI?is=GyvjxTKeAwZvcCgE

Comments are closed.