Short Preview
This Week at Solari
Solari Interview
Movie of the Week
Hero of the Week
Solari’s weekly Money & Markets reports are hosted by Catherine Austin Fitts and John Titus. Catherine and John discuss the latest financial and geopolitical news—each week summarized by an evocative theme—and monitor significant trends in areas such as “Fed Watch,” “Space, Military, and Global Turf Wars,” “Hey Robot,” and “Pharmageddon.” They also track and celebrate noteworthy pushback around the world. Money & Markets is published on Thursday evenings, with the exception of the last week of the month. Subscribers can access Money & Markets in either audio or video formats (both downloadable).
Already a subscriber? Log in
New to the Solari Report? Check out our Welcome Page
Not a subscriber yet? Subscribe now
With a Solari Report subscription, you get access to:
- ✔ The popular and informative Money & Markets show co-hosted by Catherine Austin Fitts and John Titus
- ✔ Weekly interviews with top guests, and quarterly deep dives into major trends affecting you day-to-day
- ✔ Aggregation of the most relevant news stories
- ✔ Subscriber-only events and a digital platform to connect with other subscribers
178 Comments
Comments are closed.
SO NOW THE MEANING OF”GAIN OF FUNCTION” IS TO BE CHANGED…IN ORDER TO PROTECT EVIL PEOPLE? BRINGS TO MIND,ONCE READ THAT WEBSTER WROTE THE DICTIONARY BECAUSE HE WAS AFRAID THE MEANINGS OF THE WORDS IN OUR CONSTITUTION WOULD BE CHANGED AND WE WOULD LOSE IT,THUS HE MEANT TO STANDARDIZE IN ORDER TO PROTECT IT…..NOTE HOW OFTEN MEANINGS OF WORDS AND LANGUAGE ITSELF ARE NOW BEING CHANGED BY PEOPLE NOT MEANING US WELL!
Yes, it’s true…they try to pen you into using words limited to their field of acceptable discussion, or to change definitions of words. Basic Marxism. But instead of “gain of function”… “weaponize”, or a descriptive word of your choice. Regardless of what they say.
AND THOSE FEARS WERE EXPRESSED BY WEBSTER OVER 200 YEARS AGO!
AND THOSE FEARS WERE EXPRESSED BY WEBSTER OVER 200 YEARS AGO!
Re: The WHO, IHR, One Health, Pandemic Treaty “negotiations”, etc. superfluous to existing US law?
Katherine Watt is a brilliant legal scholar and analyst. She has no connection to any formerly prestigious grotesquely politicized name law schools. Makes the celebrity media lawyers look foolish and compromised by comparison. Often collaborates with Sasha Latypova.
Her Substack is Bailiwick News.
She’s a para-legal by trade. Finds the appropriate references and lets them speak for themselves. Adds interpretation when needed. A rare talent.
https://substack.com/home/post/p-144661255
Re: The WHO, IHR, One Health, Pandemic Treaty “negotiations”, etc. superfluous to existing US law?
Katherine Watt is a brilliant legal scholar and analyst. She has no connection to any formerly prestigious grotesquely politicized name law schools. Makes the celebrity media lawyers look foolish and compromised by comparison. Often collaborates with Sasha Latypova.
Her Substack is Bailiwick News.
She’s a para-legal by trade. Finds the appropriate references and lets them speak for themselves. Adds interpretation when needed. A rare talent.
https://substack.com/home/post/p-144661255
Biden’s China Tariffs Are the End of an Era for Cheap Chinese Goods – The New York Times (nytimes.com)
Good article on the end of the consumption driven economic model in the West.
Mr. Biden’s decision on Tuesday to codify and escalate tariffs imposed by Mr. Trump made clear that the United States has closed out a decades-long era that embraced trade with China and prized the gains of lower-cost products over the loss of geographically concentrated manufacturing jobs.
“There’s a group of people who think that consumption is the end,” Mr. Lighthizer said. “And my view is production is the end, and safe and happy communities are the end. You should be willing to pay a price for that.”
One comment noted that some of the Chinese production is moving to Mexico and the tariffs will not apply, so it is more show that it would appear. Any merit to that?
I did some importing from China since 2017. When the Trump tariffs on certain goods from/Made in China were announced, I found that many Chinese suppliers opened up shop in Vietnam and other countries to get around both the Made In China stigma and the Trump tariffs. It’s an end-around maneuver and I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Chinese manufacturers set up shop in Mexico and do the same thing. Importers will be THRILLED with the freight charge decrease as well as becoming eligible for free trade across the southern border.
Biden’s China Tariffs Are the End of an Era for Cheap Chinese Goods – The New York Times (nytimes.com)
Good article on the end of the consumption driven economic model in the West.
Mr. Biden’s decision on Tuesday to codify and escalate tariffs imposed by Mr. Trump made clear that the United States has closed out a decades-long era that embraced trade with China and prized the gains of lower-cost products over the loss of geographically concentrated manufacturing jobs.
“There’s a group of people who think that consumption is the end,” Mr. Lighthizer said. “And my view is production is the end, and safe and happy communities are the end. You should be willing to pay a price for that.”
One comment noted that some of the Chinese production is moving to Mexico and the tariffs will not apply, so it is more show that it would appear. Any merit to that?
I did some importing from China since 2017. When the Trump tariffs on certain goods from/Made in China were announced, I found that many Chinese suppliers opened up shop in Vietnam and other countries to get around both the Made In China stigma and the Trump tariffs. It’s an end-around maneuver and I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Chinese manufacturers set up shop in Mexico and do the same thing. Importers will be THRILLED with the freight charge decrease as well as becoming eligible for free trade across the southern border.