A Short Preview:

Theme: Keep Calm and Carry on in the Kill Zone

Ask Catherine will be posted on Friday here.

Interview: 3rd Quarter 2023 Wrap Up: News Trends & Stories, Part II with Dr. Joseph P. Farrell

Take Action

Please login to see stories, charts, and subscriber-only content.
Not a subscriber yet? You are invited to join here!


145 Comments

  2. In the summer of 2012, I met 6 Jordanian generals in a Beijing Holiday Inn. They were there with their wives to meet a Chinese general I saw in the distance. When the generals departed for their meeting, the wives gifted me a bottle of water from the Jordanian River and whispered that Syria will no longer exist.

  3. I cant help but ask where is the UN? Isnt there a mandate to keep peace and go after war crimes?
    Or is this just another “hypocrisy” coming to the surface?

  4. Wow. Super Money & Mkts Report this week. So many accelerating events and you did a great job connecting the dots, particularly between global economic twists and turns as related to the events in the Middle East. From a risk management standpoint Catherine, I certainly agree with you that the legal hats looking at Pfizer are more that contemplating the potential liability that company could have as the fallacy of the injections emerges. The demand for the “vaccine” was based on fear not strong productive economic demand that creates wealth and productivity due to a product’s use or efficacy. As fear of the “pandemic” wanes, vaccine injury is documented and the vaccine’s failure to prevent disease itself is laid bare, there is no place for the value of this company to go but down. Fear is not a good economic growth engine. I think diminishing vaccine uptake was somewhat factored into the scam and that’s why another war has evolved to open spigots to help provide some financial cover for this, as you also mentioned, but also to support an overall control plan. Whether the DOD is providing “vaccines”, bio weapons, smart bombs or drones the evil control plan continues. I do think resistance to the “vaccine” may have happened faster than Mr. Global anticipated so the need to control has unfortunately been ramped up. Big thumbs up to the New Media for contributing to opening up the world’s eyes and mine!

    1. Wonder how many investors are walking away from Pfizer because they simply want nothing to do with them. Major brand issue in additional to the legal liabilities. I can not find any other logic to what has happened then Pfizer agreeing contractually with DOD to change peoples DNA, experiment with them and kill and disable them intentionally with poisons/bioweapons.

  5. Small sample in my world saw 75% compliance with at least the first 2 jabs of what I believe was primarily Moderna. Conservative county and most of the folks were also.I think driven by fear and a dumfounding trust of the government’s medical “experts”?. Boosters? ZERO. Unbelievable. Same groups working to uncover the fraud they now see had warned them at the start. Maybe I’m just old but I could not believe the trust It’s like ” thank you sir, may I have another”. After all this there were still a couple of people coerced into getting the jab due to some medical condition and fear they would not get appropriate treatment if clean, so to speak. The spook tradecraft is diabolical.

  6. “Believe none of what you hear, and half of what you see”. Has never been more relevant than today. Go look up the recent Adobe Keynote and Sneaks. That’s the technology available to lay people TODAY. There’s definitely a government contractor version of that type of thing which can manufacturer and manipulate video sound and photos in a way that is difficult to fully comprehend.

    The kibbutz video could be true, or it could be made courtesy of a library of crime scene and war videos and tweaked to fit. That could have been a real video with real blood from another real crimescene added and “brushed” on.

    Watch the Adobe Max keynote or sections of it and you’ll know what I’m talking about.

    1. David is smart and sincere and has worked hard for many years to investigate the custodian issues on securities and related collateral fraud. I need to go through his documentation more carefully. The last time I walked through it, I had some disagreements and did not have the chance to go through the issues with him – which I will before I interview him in November when he will be on the Solari Report. Where I agree with him is that the leadership has the intention to assert control and seizure of assets. I would say that it is all assets, not just securities. If the leadership achieves financial transaction control they have multiple ways of seizing or taxing all assets into their control.

      1. In a mass seizure scenario, “capitalism” and markets would end. Historically, constrained and forced labor has not lead to productivity or innovation. Neither has central planning with unreliable computers and digital sstems.

        If some humans may be needed to keep the machines working, what kind of social contract might be used to solicit the free will of those who have been stripped of all assets?

        Could “capitalism” persist within some geo-fenced regions, e.g. the Green zones of Iraq or the TV series Colony and Incorporated?

        1. Financial transaction control results in slavery. If we do not prevent it, there will be no “free will” other than what is achieved with mind control. Logically you can assume there will be transition periods and zones. However, the negative return on investment in the system logically should always lead to more destruction of any free people or areas. That is why the sooner we dial back and walk away, the better.

Comments are closed.