11 Comments

1. Even in it’s most idealistic format, democracy still involves violent coercion of a minority of the population. While it may be better than plutocracy or feudal dictatorships, I would describe all of those systems (including democracy and all other forms of involuntary governance, whether it is communism, fascism or anything else where violent coercion is inherent in the system as inherently immoral and based in mind control).

   As a permaculture designer I came to this realization when I honestly assessed our current system of government (and the most ideal formats of democracy) through the permaculture design ethics lens. What I came to realize is that all involuntary governance is antithetical to the permaculture design ethics.

   For more info:

   https://gavinmounsey.substack.com/p/why-involuntary-governance-structures?

2. So glad for the two of you! inspiring

3. Brilliant synthesis. Stiles has nailed it. It’s hidden in plain sight and the sheeple are being hearded into Mr Global’s End Times pen…

   1. Absolutely. What a great discussion. It’s like we had most of the jigsaw pieces, and Stiles has put them all into place. Well done Elze

4. Interesting interview. The “infrastructure of belief” and “monopoly tree” is very useful and insightful. Sharing the study guide in pdf form is very generous, thank you very much.

   What worries me, is if I will have the courage to see thru what life will still throw at me. Forming interactions with people of high integrity could insulate that a bit. Need to get my people skills up, not exactly a strong suit of mine.

   My bookshelf is in trouble, not to mention the backlog of books still to read, none the less ordered the book.

5. I found this extremely difficult to follow and wish the interviewer hadn’t interrupted her right when she was getting to the point.

   1. It wasn’t an interview but a conversation between a teacher and a not native speaking student.

6. I cannot help thinking our capacity to “free will” is the best guarantor against mind control, especially coupled with integrity and knowledge of history. Our society puts emphasis on the few that predict future waves of thinking eventually followed by the multitudes. Those “few” often become people of renown, only question is, was it due to good insights, intuition and or was it thru manipulatory tactics with evil intent? Both exists of course, but manipulatory tactics with evil intent seem more prevalent if history shows anything! I suppose free will coupled with integrity takes work and humanity seems to a great degree creatures of comfort. This “comfort” is becoming very costly due to evil’s intent on erasing “free will” by all means available. Thierry Meyssan’s excellent articles always remind me of the fact that being lazy and comfortable is not an option. No matter how old I am, I have a lot to observe and still learn, especially history!

   In Jerusalem, the “Conference for the Victory of Israel” threatens London and Washington.
   https://www.voltairenet.org/article220413.html

7. I think one of the more insidious forms of soft mind control utilized by Mr. Global and his friends in recent decades (especially here in Canada) is something I refer to as pseudocaring.

   I explore the concept and touch on some of the many ways how it is weaponized against the minds of the masses in this post:

   https://gavinmounsey.substack.com/p/the-revolution-will-involve-fermented?

Comments are closed.