"It [the experimental injection] is a bioweapon. If people don’t understand, we cannot help them."
~ Dr. Sherri Tenpenny
By Catherine Austin Fitts
I’m delighted to have Dr. Sherri Tenpenny back on the Solari Report for the latest update on the experimental injections. Since January 2020, Dr. Tenpenny has been on a mission to educate as many people as possible about Covid-19 and the risks of a “vaccine” that is being presented as the solution to the “crisis.” Dr Tenpenny’s new book covers 20 mechanisms through which these injections may injure people. Months after the first injections have been administered, we still don’t know exactly what’s in them—and it appears that the recipe may be changing!
While this is happening, bank stocks are flying. There is growing concern about the implementation in the next few months of a total control system (“passports”) targeting work, spatial movement, and finance. It is imperative to understand the physical dangers of these experimental injections and how they may relate to the central bankers’ push for total control.
In this interview, Dr. Tenpenny and I discuss a possible third wave that could be worse due to antibody-dependent enhancement, concerns about the stability of the messenger RNA (mRNA) during transport, the latest OSHA ruling, issues around liability and informed consent, as well as what we can do to slow down the use of Covid-19 to justify rising tyranny and inequality.
Join me for another not-to-be-missed interview with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny.
Related Links:
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny’s website where you can find her latest creations:
- New podcast: The Tenpenny Files
- Bootcamp: A 6-week online intensive training on vaccines and how to communicate on those difficult topics in a way that is effective but not offensive
- E-book: The 20 Mechanisms of Injury
Special podcast with Dr. Lee Merritt on the history of infertility shots and the difference between shedding and transmitting something
Summary of Further Modelling of Easing Restrictions – Roadmap Step 2
New York Times Coronavirus Vaccine Tracker
VAERS Adverse Events (when a patient dies after COVID-19 vaccine)
VAERS Adverse Events (any adverse event after receiving COVID-19 vaccine)
I agree with Paul and Yoko regarding Dr. Tenpenny and her summary of the two SAGE document paragraphs. It therefore places doubt on other points she makes.
On a positive note there is an edifying interview by Bret Weinstein with Geert Vanden Bossche. Kind of lengthy but a very stimulating conversation as Geert has ‘specialist expertise in virology and vaccinology’. Spike protein s and other nuances of the so-called vaccine are addressed thoroughly. Bret has done his homework.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNyAovuUxro
Breaking News: Dr. Byron Bridle (2nd link below) spike protein getting into blood stream and is a pathogen – peer reviewed study. First link is very thoughtful look at vaccine good / bad / potential issues. Feb 2021.
https://youtu.be/VrNQ8hkxHw8
https://omny.fm/shows/on-point-with-alex-pierson/new-peer-reviewed-study-on-covid-19-vaccines-sugge
Thank you Catherine and Dr. Tenpenny for an incredibly informative interview. Two amazing and ultra-smart women in their fields collaborating to get the information to us and help connect the dots…Namaste!
I have tried for many months now to protect my friends and primarily my ‘pod’ of 10 family members. My two sisters and all my close friends have taken the jabs much to my heart-felt sadness. I have stopped giving them educational information and don’t talk Covid with them anymore; and simply accept their choices.
However, I just learned that my only son-in-law just took the J&J shot a few weeks ago. My daughter has not and probably won’t as she has auto-immune issues and has had a bad reaction to a DPT vaccine in the past. My two grandchildren, aged 7 and 4 are the youngest in the family and I pray they are not harmed, but could they be?
They are due to visit with my husband and me (neither of us has taken any shots) for several weekends this summer. Can I hug my grandchildren and daughter? Will they be carrying the transmitted spike protein from their Dad? Will he spread this spike protein in my home? Do I put any restrictions of masks and/or testing before they come until more is known? Should they wait for longer before they visit? I am on prophylactic HCQ, Vit D3, quercetin, Mag, Vit C and some more. My husband is on Vit D3, Mag and has both ‘electrical and plumbing’ issues with his heart with an LAD stent and is on some heart meds. I am confident I am protected, but concerned about him. I would SO appreciate any feedback, resources; the interview as well as all the comments always ultra-inform! I do see a few links already in the comment section so will check those out and I did take Dr. Tenpenny’s 20 MOI ‘course’ and learned a lot and will purchase her ebook; I so appreciate all the deep-dives she has and is doing….an angel for sure! THANKS TO ALL FOR ALL YOUR INPUTS!!
Today in the Gannett paper here, The Ithaca Journal, we see that Gov. Cuomo has promised paid sick leave for anyone who needs time to recover from the injections. Will doctors be trained to treat? Earlier NY learned of a college-scholarship lottery, and we have been offered free state park passes. My YMCA has announced one lane in the pool for the un-injected. Looks like I will have to declare my status or quit swimming, my best lifetime exercise. I think the reduction goals are not higher that 10% on this round, so probably the ingredients in my area are not lethal. Still, I resent the coercion from the dearest ones. Thanks for listening, many thanks fr your speaking. Lisa Turner
Dear Catherine,
I appreciate you so much for all you bring to us. I have looked to you for guidance for many years and especially now in these turbulent, scary times. You are my go to person!! I also looked up to Dr Tenpenny for all of her time and deep diving into vaccines, that is, untill today… I haven’t been refered to as an “abomination” for many, many years. Wow, that was a punch in the gut! I really felt the world had progressed from that mind set. Apparently I was wrong. I had no idea she felt this way. I was going to do her boot camp but now I know “my kind” wouldn’t be welcome. With her comments she has chosen to alient a whole group of human beings. I thought we were all working collectively….. gay, straight, conservative, liberal, black, white, asian, poor, rich etc. to fight Mr Global. How do I support someone when they feel I am an “abomination”? I know there are much bigger issues going on right now than me being hurt by her comments, but I just had to say how disappointed I am that Dr Tenpenny feels this way. Thanks to Josephine and Barbara for their comments. Well said!
You are not alone; there are many of us in this Solari comment stream who have commented similarly. It seems we are also confused at the neutral reaction from Catherine on blind hatred of this kind. I suppose we shall see. There has to be a way to kindly address this issue while moving forward in the agenda for Freedom (for everyone!)
Dr. Tenpenny is not the only one I have encountered in the fight against Mr. Global with reactionary “Burn the witches!”-type thoughts that express an underlying sentiment of building back an Old Testamentic world of guilt and penalty.
We shall definitely overcome Mr. Global together, but what kind of new culture will we then constitute? My hope is a real brotherhood of man!
I hope this too.
I have listened to the links here and slept on this issue and have decided to throw caution to the wind. I refuse to live my life in fear of this so will just ignore it, never take a jab but hug everyone.
I wonder if we have even considered the possibility that the ultimate goal is to vaccinate and protect all the compliant and then release the real killer of the independent and religious who will fight any such future elite/banking/fed control policies. Such a crazy world we live in…
I continue to associate with several people who have been vaccinated. I do know of people who have changed personality since being vaccinated. It is very disturbing.
It is very difficult to associate with only those who are unvaccinated as, where I live, there are very few who are unvaccinated. I notice attitude/behavior differences with those who are vaccinated…some quickly back away when they learn I am unvaccinated, some seem angry (one of my best friends got in my face and said ‘get it done!’), some just totally ignore me and some, saying they feel bullet-proof, simply act as if nothing is a problem.
From an anthropological/sociological perspective, I am kind of enjoying perceiving/watching how this all plays out, but I also feel my grief when I future-focus with all the possible death. When I am not grounded in the present, I feel as if I am living in a simulation. I do SO appreciate this forum!!
I am slightly confused about something Dr. Tenpenny said. I am writing with the hope that she and/or the Solari community will provide some clarity to me. Dr. Tenpenny referred to the white paper SPI-O: Summary of further modelling of easing restrictions – Roadmap Step 2. The specific paragraphs on which she focused were paragraph 32 and paragraph 56. In the interview Dr. Tenpenny said, “That the third wave that, when it comes this fall, that 60 to 70 percent of people who have had two shots will be hospitalized or die.” After this Catherine displayed a bit of shock, as did I when I heard Dr. Tenpenny make this statement. Catherine placed the link to the article in the Related Links section above. I followed the link and read the two paragraphs from which Dr. Tenpenny pulled this information. I read them along with her as she read in the video and several times afterward as well as the rest of the report. Dr. Tenpenny later remarked in the interview, “what they’re saying though is,…, what they’re admitting to in that paper, is antibody dependent enhancement is real.” I did not come to the same conclusion as her from this particular document.
While I am not a doctor, I am an officer in the Army, and I read many white papers each month as well as articles, books, and other technical writings spanning a plethora of subject matter. Let me tell you what I extrapolated from those paragraphs. Paragraph 32 states,
“The resurgence in both hospitalisations and deaths is dominated by those that have
received two doses of the vaccine, comprising around 60% and 70% of the wave
respectively. This can be attributed to the high levels of uptake in the most at-risk age groups, such that immunisation failures account for more serious illness than unvaccinated individuals. This is discussed further in paragraphs 55 and 56.”
From this, I draw the conclusion that of those who become hospitalized or die, 60% to 70% will have received the first and second doses of the shot. This differs from Dr. Tenpenny’s statement, “…that 60 to 70 percent of people who have had two shots will be hospitalized or die.” As paragraph 32 states, “This can be attributed to the high levels of uptake in the most at-risk age groups, such that immunisation failures account for more serious illness than unvaccinated individuals.” Since, in other areas of the white paper, the uptake of the shot in the at-risk age group is projected to be 95%, this statement draws the conclusion that these older individuals would have passed due to greater complicating issues regardless of whether they received one dose, two doses, or no dose. Again, this is my understanding of what the white paper is saying versus Dr. Tenpenny’s statement, and I am more than open to being enlightened on what I may have misunderstood.
Paragraph 32 states, “This is discussed further in paragraphs 55 and 56.” My final query in this matter comes from my understanding of paragraph 56, which states,
“This shows that most deaths and admissions in a post-Roadmap resurgence are in people who have received two vaccine doses, even without vaccine protection waning or a variant emerging that escapes vaccines. This is because vaccine uptake has been so high in the oldest age groups (modelled here at 95% in the over 50-year olds). There are therefore 5% of over 50-year olds who have not been vaccinated, and 95% x 10% = 9.5% of over 50-year olds who are vaccinated but, nevertheless, not protected against death. This is not the result of vaccines being ineffective, merely uptake being so high.”
Dr. Tenpenny read from sentence one and sentence four in the interview with Catherine, but she skipped over sentences two and three. I assume she skipped over these because they get a bit statistical and mathematical, which doesn’t usually go over well in a verbal interview. I would probably do the same and expect enthusiasts to go through the entire white paper, reading each paragraph for personal comprehension and analysis, which I did. In skipping these two sentences, the audience who only heard Dr. Tenpenny’s words and didn’t read the paragraph for themselves, who also heard her statement, “…that 60 to 70 percent of people who have had two shots will be hospitalized or die,” may reach this same conclusion. There is the phrase, “in a post-Roadmap resurgence”, alluding to the several phases outlined in the rest of the report and other results, that may inspire someone to go back and reread the two paragraphs or more of the document. Sentences two and three, in my opinion, circle back to a point made in paragraph 32, “This can be attributed to the high levels of uptake in the most at-risk age groups.” Paragraph 56 also makes the statement, “There are therefore 5% of over 50-year olds who have not been vaccinated, and 95% x 10% = 9.5% of over 50-year olds who are vaccinated but, nevertheless, not protected against death,” leading me to believe that this 9.5% outlying group is the majority of the 60% to 70% of those who received the two doses that will be hospitalized or die.
Throughout the document there are several references to a resurgence, but it will be far less than anything we have seen in the past. This deduces, again, the 9.5% of at-risk recipients discussed could plausibly engross most of the 60% – 70% that will be hospitalized or die having previously received both doses of the COVID shot. I do not believe this is solely due to the shot or differing behavior. Personally, I don’t buy anything about hospitalization rates or death rates from 2019, 2020, or 2021. I also don’t buy the efficacy statistics reported by news organizations, governments, or pharmaceutical companies regarding the shot. I do think there are more sinister forces at work in this, but I also cannot bring myself to see how Dr. Tenpenny discerned, “…that 60 to 70 percent of people who have had two shots will be hospitalized or die,” from the same document to which she continually referred, which is SPI-O: Summary of further modelling of easing restrictions – Roadmap Step 2.
This means a subset of injected people may have a false illusion of safety, when they would benefit from the same treatments that have worked for many non-injected people:
– early symptom detection (now delayed by vaccine suppression of symtoms)
– early & prophylactic treatment with Vit D, Vit C, zinc, quercetin / HCQ / Ivermectin
i.e. the crime of treatment suppression also applies to the injected.
Thank you, Eddie. Excellent analysis and research. It is a good reminder never to forget to question everything.
Edward:
Thanks for posting
Catherine
I have stumbled over the same sentence in her earlier interviews, also during the Yuba City event just recently. When I finally got hold of the SAGE report she mentions, I read the aforementioned paragraphs and I agree with your assessment. The sentence in paragraph 32 particularly does not seem to translate to Dr Tenpenny’s interpretation. I concluded with your interpretation first (that 60-70% of those in the 3rd wave could get hospitalized or die – and not 60-70% of those who hot the shots) – but in addition, paragraph 32 “The resurgence in both hospitalisations and deaths is dominated by those that have received two doses of the vaccine, comprising around 60% and 70% of the wave
respectively.” does not make a lot of sense either: are they trying to say that of the portion of people in the 3rd wave that will be hospitalized, 60% will have had shot(s) and that of the portion of people in the 3rd wave that will die, 70% will have had shot(s)?? This to me seems to align with your 7th and 8th paragraph?