"It [the experimental injection] is a bioweapon. If people don’t understand, we cannot help them."
~ Dr. Sherri Tenpenny
By Catherine Austin Fitts
I’m delighted to have Dr. Sherri Tenpenny back on the Solari Report for the latest update on the experimental injections. Since January 2020, Dr. Tenpenny has been on a mission to educate as many people as possible about Covid-19 and the risks of a “vaccine” that is being presented as the solution to the “crisis.” Dr Tenpenny’s new book covers 20 mechanisms through which these injections may injure people. Months after the first injections have been administered, we still don’t know exactly what’s in them—and it appears that the recipe may be changing!
While this is happening, bank stocks are flying. There is growing concern about the implementation in the next few months of a total control system (“passports”) targeting work, spatial movement, and finance. It is imperative to understand the physical dangers of these experimental injections and how they may relate to the central bankers’ push for total control.
In this interview, Dr. Tenpenny and I discuss a possible third wave that could be worse due to antibody-dependent enhancement, concerns about the stability of the messenger RNA (mRNA) during transport, the latest OSHA ruling, issues around liability and informed consent, as well as what we can do to slow down the use of Covid-19 to justify rising tyranny and inequality.
Join me for another not-to-be-missed interview with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny.
Related Links:
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny’s website where you can find her latest creations:
- New podcast: The Tenpenny Files
- Bootcamp: A 6-week online intensive training on vaccines and how to communicate on those difficult topics in a way that is effective but not offensive
- E-book: The 20 Mechanisms of Injury
Special podcast with Dr. Lee Merritt on the history of infertility shots and the difference between shedding and transmitting something
Summary of Further Modelling of Easing Restrictions – Roadmap Step 2
New York Times Coronavirus Vaccine Tracker
VAERS Adverse Events (when a patient dies after COVID-19 vaccine)
VAERS Adverse Events (any adverse event after receiving COVID-19 vaccine)
OSHA reversed its statement that employers are liable for adverse reactions to mandated vaccinations. Said they didn’t want to be seen as discouraging vaccinations.
The food is poisoned. The air is poisoned. The water is poisoned. All of “medicine” is a factory for biological enslavement and dependence. Vaccine schedules are already incredibly aggressive.
They don’t “need” this jab to do anything they haven’t already accomplished.
Every esoteric theory for why, be it nanotechnology or gene manipulation, have uptake methodologies that don’t require this jab.
Is it all about manufacturing consent? The more I fail to square these circles, to borrow a Masonic phrase, the more this seems ENTIRELY spiritual.
If you look at the preparation of contracts that can provide a monthly injection, I think it is likely there is a physical installation involved even if the goal is entirely spiritual.
100%, Catherine. And there seems to be advantages for them using injectables that cross the blood-brain barrier vs. GI tract.
As a “slow drip” alternative, however, MMR shot compliance is much higher than this jab will ever be, and it’s administered by the same companies with the same extralegal arbitration system already in place to mitigate financial liability.
Ignoring the multivariate “stacked functions” of this agenda, in terms of preferred installation of the “OS of Life,” the word IMPATIENCE comes to mind.
> Agenda 21 (~108 years at launch)
> Agenda 2050 (~42 years at launch)
> Agenda 2030 (~15 years at launch)
Why the rush? There is far less resistance among the youth, they’d have this game on-lock if they didn’t press so hard and fast. This question is (mostly) rhetorical as if you can’t figure out why Mr. Global is blitzing, I sure as heck can’t.
P.S. In the software industry, we call these rolling updates “Merge Requests.” Disturbingly fitting terminology.
@26:27m… Sadly… OHSA came out and retracted the its requirement… https://www.glassmagazine.com/news/osha-changes-guidance-employer-mandated-vaccinations-recording-procedures
Thanks for this discussion with Dr. Tenpenny Catherine! You both present such a necessary high level of quality research which truly helps to calm nerves out here a bit. So great to hear about the different aspects to the injection issue both medical and financial, the twin pillars of existence which both need to be healthy to ensure human survival. I was surprised to hear the latest director, appointed as of June 18, 2020, for the Natural Museum of London was Dr. Douglas Gurr…former Head of Amazon UK from 2016 to 2020, former Pres. of Amazon China 2014 to 2016, and formerly with McKinsey & Co. What is significant is the connection of this museum to a large scientific community which we can only hope will not be “hijacked” and used to promote “certain” scientific thinking. So many figureheads today have ties to organizations which can, if influenced in the wrong way, foster manipulation over science. So many current studies are slowly being headed by those who may be rather used to, comfortable with or formally a part of Mr. Global’s agenda….all too often results can be skewed. When you spoke of the hardware in our skies…there are websites online that really galvanize the immensity of just what’s up there….it’s 3/4’s of the “trap”. Control of the space lanes as you say…..
Best Always to you.
New England Journal of Medicine
Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983
Excerpt:
Among 3958 participants enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry, 827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) resulted in a pregnancy loss and 712 (86.1%) resulted in a live birth (mostly among participants with vaccination in the third trimester). Adverse neonatal outcomes included preterm birth (in 9.4%) and small size for gestational age (in 3.2%); no neonatal deaths were reported.
I have hugged at least two friends that have taken the Covid shot. Does this mean that they have shed on me? This is truly terrifying. I believe that love is important and that is why I still am friends with them. I will pray and hope that I have done the right thing.
As CAF says, everyone must defend against the broader “Great Poisoning”.
Fear can be infectious with psy effect of amplifying threats and weakening defenses.
I take prophylactic treatment, monitor early symptoms (of whatever) and live precious life.
Catherine,
Myself and many others are confused about Ten penny’s statement concerning the sage article. Her statement does not line up with the paragraphs she read and claimed it was in plain English. Please find the article for us to read ourselves. Many thanks for all that you do…
~Paul
Paul:
I emailed her and posted above. Here it is again https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/975909/S1182_SPI-M-O_Summary_of_modelling_of_easing_roadmap_step_2_restrictions.pdf
I also found her interpretation of paragraphs 55-56 confusing upon a closer read. The projection and explanation didn’t raise a red flag with me other than point out the injections appear to be largely ineffective to emergent variants. The model predicts a post road map resurgence (another wave) and that deaths and hospitalizations will occur. The report states, “This shows that most deaths and admissions in a post-Roadmap resurgence are in people who have received two vaccine doses, even without vaccine protection waning or a variant emerging that escapes vaccines.This is because vaccine uptake has been so high in the oldest age groups (modelled here at 95% in the over 50-year olds). There are therefore 5% of over 50-year olds who have not been vaccinated, and 95% x 10% = 9.5% of over 50-year olds who are vaccinated but,nevertheless,not protected against death. This is not the result of vaccines being ineffective, merely uptake being so high.”