74 Comments

1. I’d love to hear Dr. Tenpenny’s opinion on NAC as r/t someone who’s already had a shot?
   Fantastic interview, thank you ladies.

   https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318902
   ” In the current study, we show that S protein alone can damage vascular endothelial cells (ECs) .. ”
   “These changes of pACE2, ACE2, MDM2 expression, and AMPK activity in endothelium were recapitulated by in vitro experiments using pulmonary arterial ECs (endothelial cells ) infected with Pseu-Spike which was rescued by treatment with N-acetyl-L-cysteine, a reactive oxygen species inhibitor (Figure [B], ii).”

   1. I also wonder the history of those FDA approved drugs pulled from the market for re-evaluation and application of “black box warnings”, and how does that compare with this treatment that’s approved only through EUA?
      What’s the criteria and how are we measuring up with the vax?
      I haven’t looked it up but I’m gonna guess that drugs have been pulled for far less than what we’ve seen so far from this mess.

2. Please check out this interview with Dr. Michael Yeadon, former Vice President and Chief Science Officer of Pfizer on Rumble and hear what he has to say about the fraud of the PCR test and the vaccine paasport agenda. Please share the video to “wake up” those who are on the fence.

   https://rumble.com/vhsldv-interview-with-michael-yeadon-former-vice-president-and-chief-science-offic.html

   1. Karen,
      He was excellent. The only question I have is whether these experimental injections should be given to anyone because 3 people I know of, elderly but mostly in good health, fell sick within 24 hours of receiving the 2nd injection and they all had the same problem of bleeding, 2 died so far, so I suppose they made antibodies against their platelets. I also know of elderly who got Covid and took the HCQ protocol and were fine, so personally I don’t see why anyone young or old needs to risk taking these injections when there are safe treatments available. With the amount of death and injury all of these injections should be pulled off the market. In the 1970s only 25 people died with the Swine Flu shot and they pulled it off .

      When they started threatening another Swine flu epedemic a few years back I heard people saying they wouldn’t take the shot for a million dollars. It’s bizarre that people were aware of the 25 deaths but not the 4000 plus on VAERS and who knows how many really?

      1. You are right! The cognitive dissonance is extreme. I totally agree that these Covid vaccines need to be removed from the market immediately or a temporary ban be placed on them at the very least. Here is an article that you maybe interested in. It discusses the mechanisms that the spike proteins from the vaccines cause blood clots.

         https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/vaccine-researcher-admits-big-mistake-says-spike-protein-is-dangerous-toxin

3. Thank you Catherine. Helpful to hear Sherri talk about the bleeding and blood . A friend of mine has a family member going through this very thing ( uncontrolled bleeding) and the MDs will not acknowledge that there is any connection to the vaccine which was taken less than 24 hours before the symptoms started.

   Good to hear Sherri and you both talk about this with regards to your faith in the Bible. So many Bible believers are just ignoring the passages about “not being able to buy or sell” without the “mark”. I’m not a theologian but I’ve studied the Bible for decades and do not understand how one could not see these injections as part of the anti-messiah system. The Bible clearly says that “the life is in the blood” so it’s disturbing that both the virus and the vaccines are affecting the blood. The virus affected the hemoglobin metabolism so at a cellular level and now with the injections, people are either having clots or uncontrolled bleeding.

   Since the injections are not yet attached to bank accounts, technically one could argue it’s not “the mark”. Others will say that the person will actually have to make a clear decision that they are worshipping the beast instead of God. It looks to me like the infrastructure is being put in place and there will be some sudden shift in the financial system where the pressure will be great to connect “to the 5G grid” and at this point there will be a conscious decision taken to become a slave to this system.

   It looks like this is some kind of two step process. The first step is that people are willingly taking some kind of new technology into their body without regards to what it will do to their health, minds etc. The second step is that the pressure being used to manipulate people to take the injections will be ramped up and we will be forced to face things that are life or death issues like how to we buy food, if we are not prepared.

   The powers that be/ Mr Global seem to know how to play the public like a violin by closing people in, limiting travel, not letting love ones see their sick family etc. etc. also making them forget their basic human rights. It’s a safe bet that they/Mr Global also understand a most basic human need is sustenance and this is the card they will play to move people to their system.

   This is all of course if people don’t wake up sooner and seriously resist all of this pressure. It’s hard to gauge whether there is still enough resistance to turn things around but we all need to keep trying, so grateful for all you are doing and others who really seem to understand what’s at stake. . You don’t say it outright but I will. This is really a question of eternal life since a transhumance cannot inherit the kingdom of God and we are eternal beings.

   For those that don’t have a biblical perspective, it may be helpful to know that they can turn to the God of the Bible, he will not only give you wisdom but the strength to walk through what ever comes. This is not coming as a surprise to him because he gave the revelation to John almost 2000 years ago.

   1. OH Joyce…beautifully said!! Thank you!!
      Blessings

4. While I greatly admire Dr. Tenpenny and her unparalleled work on informing us about the dangers of the COVID-19 vaccines, I was very disappointed in her homophobic comments at the end of the interview. Homosexuality is a state of being, not an act. We are all made by the same Creator. There are many statements n the Bible that are not relevant to today’s societal standards of morality. Those of us who are gay and also sincerely striving to help humanity wake up to the globalists’ threats should not be shunned by this community.

   1. I totally agree – very small minded, blinded comment. I had to take a deep breath and reflect whether or not I was going to come back to this site – I have not heard anything that appalling in a VERY LONG time –

      1. I am enjoying it while my subscription lasts; not sure if I’ll renew. Mostly because all I got from Catherine was a confusing “LOL!” to my comment about this. I absolutely LOVE hearing from my elders and appreciate their wealth of knowledge and what they’ve seen during their lifetime, but to hear that I’m not gonna be welcome, whether explictly as Tenpenny expresses, or implicitly by Catherine’s silence on the divisive comment, well.. she’s right to say its further division. Things like this can be confronted while preserving the dignity of Tenpenny and her research. Its not that hard, just say something like, ‘this isn’t the place to discuss such things’ …
         Tenpennys comment makes this video un-shareable as now allllll the information is clouded by her comment near the end. Look how many people here have said how bothered they are by it. We are trying to find sanity in crazy times and we still get hit in the face with this kinda stuff. Why??
         I’m actually more upset that she voiced her comment in the interview; I respect her right to have her own opinion on the matter, but a professional will not let their opinions come before the research and the work to awaken humanity to Mr. Global’s plans. How can we mobilize against it if we still get stuck on things like this?

         I want to move past it. I want to ignore it and just focus on what’s good here.

         1. Actually, the LOL was meant for a different thread. Went back and realized it looked like it was to yours. Not quite sure how that happened. Will check back after todays recording and see if I can find my response or rewrite it.

            1. My approach is defined by my early access to a rich flow of intelligence about how the people at the top manage things. As a result, I focus on what has the biggest Delta – what gets the most result for the least effort.

               The people who are centralizing control are hurting everyone – I describe the issue here in the story of my mothers assassination:

               https://home.solari.com/meditations-at-the-crossroads/

               I focus on the violations of the Constitution, the law and regulations by the US government and the financial institutions that harms everyone and what we can do about it – both individually, in families, in communities. If we allow a small group of people freedom to operate above the law, we are toast.

               I generally avoid the issues that galvanize strong emotional reactions. I have found that an institution can steal $100,000 per taxpayer but win the taxpayer as a customer if they give them a tiny kickback to open an account
               and make ads catering to their sexual preferences.

               I have spent too much time listening to people at the top realize they are free to steal all the money and poison and kill with impunity so long as they embroil the taxpayers with endless series of cultural issues.

               Are these issues important? Yes. But most of the public debates and generation of offense are engineered furballs.

               For the most part I avoid them all- not because they are not important but because I do not have the bandwidth.

               I don’t speculate because I don’t have all the time I want for investment. I tend not to read or listen to disinformation or sources of questionable integrity, not because it might not be useful, but because I do not have enough time to watch and read everything of high integrity that I think is important to read or watch.

               It is a bandwidth issue. My enemies have trillions. I operate on a small trickle – which I am most grateful for as it gives me the basis to lead from a place of independence.

               What I know about the issues I do focus on is that if we solved the governance issues, including the related management of currency, equity and government credit, all the other issues would sort out. Consequently, I focus on what will get the job done as opposed to the things that get people all riled up – in many cases because we have been programmed to get all riled up.

               The reason i did not engage with Tenpenny related to her comment on homosexuality was that it was not the topic of the interview and the interview was ending. The last thing i wanted to do was start on a new topic that can not be short and I did not want to start on a topic that was not germane to the immediate conversation.

               Tenpenny has repeatedly risked her life, her financial security and worked
               very hard to protect everyone – all ages, all background, all sexual indentities. If everyone had done what Tenpenny has done, we would not be in this pickle.

               In my book she has every right to express her opinion on any of the sex and culture war issues she cares about. But I am not interested in discussing or following up.

               I know my enemies. There is nothing they would love more than to herd me into that trap. It would make their day. They tried for many years to frame me and snare me on homosexuality issues. It never worked – other than to provide me with massive intelligence on their many uses of both hetrosexual and homosexual politics. The Shriek-O-Meter is endlessly creative when it comes to human sexuality.

               If I could make any recommendation, it would be to study mind control and how these fur balls get created and managed.

               And then there is this:

               https://library.solari.com/commentary-collection-promoting-women/

         2. well said – thank you

            1. Agree

5. I am slightly confused about something Dr. Tenpenny said. I am writing with the hope that she and/or the Solari community will provide some clarity to me. Dr. Tenpenny referred to the white paper SPI-O: Summary of further modelling of easing restrictions – Roadmap Step 2. The specific paragraphs on which she focused were paragraph 32 and paragraph 56. In the interview Dr. Tenpenny said, “That the third wave that, when it comes this fall, that 60 to 70 percent of people who have had two shots will be hospitalized or die.” After this Catherine displayed a bit of shock, as did I when I heard Dr. Tenpenny make this statement. Catherine placed the link to the article in the Related Links section above. I followed the link and read the two paragraphs from which Dr. Tenpenny pulled this information. I read them along with her as she read in the video and several times afterward as well as the rest of the report. Dr. Tenpenny later remarked in the interview, “what they’re saying though is,…, what they’re admitting to in that paper, is antibody dependent enhancement is real.” I did not come to the same conclusion as her from this particular document.

   While I am not a doctor, I am an officer in the Army, and I read many white papers each month as well as articles, books, and other technical writings spanning a plethora of subject matter. Let me tell you what I extrapolated from those paragraphs. Paragraph 32 states,

   “The resurgence in both hospitalisations and deaths is dominated by those that have
   received two doses of the vaccine, comprising around 60% and 70% of the wave
   respectively. This can be attributed to the high levels of uptake in the most at-risk age groups, such that immunisation failures account for more serious illness than unvaccinated individuals. This is discussed further in paragraphs 55 and 56.”

   From this, I draw the conclusion that of those who become hospitalized or die, 60% to 70% will have received the first and second doses of the shot. This differs from Dr. Tenpenny’s statement, “…that 60 to 70 percent of people who have had two shots will be hospitalized or die.” As paragraph 32 states, “This can be attributed to the high levels of uptake in the most at-risk age groups, such that immunisation failures account for more serious illness than unvaccinated individuals.” Since, in other areas of the white paper, the uptake of the shot in the at-risk age group is projected to be 95%, this statement draws the conclusion that these older individuals would have passed due to greater complicating issues regardless of whether they received one dose, two doses, or no dose. Again, this is my understanding of what the white paper is saying versus Dr. Tenpenny’s statement, and I am more than open to being enlightened on what I may have misunderstood.

   Paragraph 32 states, “This is discussed further in paragraphs 55 and 56.” My final query in this matter comes from my understanding of paragraph 56, which states,

   “This shows that most deaths and admissions in a post-Roadmap resurgence are in people who have received two vaccine doses, even without vaccine protection waning or a variant emerging that escapes vaccines. This is because vaccine uptake has been so high in the oldest age groups (modelled here at 95% in the over 50-year olds). There are therefore 5% of over 50-year olds who have not been vaccinated, and 95% x 10% = 9.5% of over 50-year olds who are vaccinated but, nevertheless, not protected against death. This is not the result of vaccines being ineffective, merely uptake being so high.”

   Dr. Tenpenny read from sentence one and sentence four in the interview with Catherine, but she skipped over sentences two and three. I assume she skipped over these because they get a bit statistical and mathematical, which doesn’t usually go over well in a verbal interview. I would probably do the same and expect enthusiasts to go through the entire white paper, reading each paragraph for personal comprehension and analysis, which I did. In skipping these two sentences, the audience who only heard Dr. Tenpenny’s words and didn’t read the paragraph for themselves, who also heard her statement, “…that 60 to 70 percent of people who have had two shots will be hospitalized or die,” may reach this same conclusion. There is the phrase, “in a post-Roadmap resurgence”, alluding to the several phases outlined in the rest of the report and other results, that may inspire someone to go back and reread the two paragraphs or more of the document. Sentences two and three, in my opinion, circle back to a point made in paragraph 32, “This can be attributed to the high levels of uptake in the most at-risk age groups.” Paragraph 56 also makes the statement, “There are therefore 5% of over 50-year olds who have not been vaccinated, and 95% x 10% = 9.5% of over 50-year olds who are vaccinated but, nevertheless, not protected against death,” leading me to believe that this 9.5% outlying group is the majority of the 60% to 70% of those who received the two doses that will be hospitalized or die.

   Throughout the document there are several references to a resurgence, but it will be far less than anything we have seen in the past. This deduces, again, the 9.5% of at-risk recipients discussed could plausibly engross most of the 60% – 70% that will be hospitalized or die having previously received both doses of the COVID shot. I do not believe this is solely due to the shot or differing behavior. Personally, I don’t buy anything about hospitalization rates or death rates from 2019, 2020, or 2021. I also don’t buy the efficacy statistics reported by news organizations, governments, or pharmaceutical companies regarding the shot. I do think there are more sinister forces at work in this, but I also cannot bring myself to see how Dr. Tenpenny discerned, “…that 60 to 70 percent of people who have had two shots will be hospitalized or die,” from the same document to which she continually referred, which is SPI-O: Summary of further modelling of easing restrictions – Roadmap Step 2.

   1. I have stumbled over the same sentence in her earlier interviews, also during the Yuba City event just recently. When I finally got hold of the SAGE report she mentions, I read the aforementioned paragraphs and I agree with your assessment. The sentence in paragraph 32 particularly does not seem to translate to Dr Tenpenny’s interpretation. I concluded with your interpretation first (that 60-70% of those in the 3rd wave could get hospitalized or die – and not 60-70% of those who hot the shots) – but in addition, paragraph 32 “The resurgence in both hospitalisations and deaths is dominated by those that have received two doses of the vaccine, comprising around 60% and 70% of the wave
      respectively.” does not make a lot of sense either: are they trying to say that of the portion of people in the 3rd wave that will be hospitalized, 60% will have had shot(s) and that of the portion of people in the 3rd wave that will die, 70% will have had shot(s)?? This to me seems to align with your 7th and 8th paragraph?

   2. Edward:

      Thanks for posting

      Catherine

   3. Thank you, Eddie. Excellent analysis and research. It is a good reminder never to forget to question everything.

   4. This means a subset of injected people may have a false illusion of safety, when they would benefit from the same treatments that have worked for many non-injected people:

      – early symptom detection (now delayed by vaccine suppression of symtoms)
      – early & prophylactic treatment with Vit D, Vit C, zinc, quercetin / HCQ / Ivermectin

      i.e. the crime of treatment suppression also applies to the injected.

6. I have listened to the links here and slept on this issue and have decided to throw caution to the wind. I refuse to live my life in fear of this so will just ignore it, never take a jab but hug everyone.
   I wonder if we have even considered the possibility that the ultimate goal is to vaccinate and protect all the compliant and then release the real killer of the independent and religious who will fight any such future elite/banking/fed control policies. Such a crazy world we live in…

   1. I continue to associate with several people who have been vaccinated. I do know of people who have changed personality since being vaccinated. It is very disturbing.

      1. It is very difficult to associate with only those who are unvaccinated as, where I live, there are very few who are unvaccinated. I notice attitude/behavior differences with those who are vaccinated…some quickly back away when they learn I am unvaccinated, some seem angry (one of my best friends got in my face and said ‘get it done!’), some just totally ignore me and some, saying they feel bullet-proof, simply act as if nothing is a problem.
         From an anthropological/sociological perspective, I am kind of enjoying perceiving/watching how this all plays out, but I also feel my grief when I future-focus with all the possible death. When I am not grounded in the present, I feel as if I am living in a simulation. I do SO appreciate this forum!!

7. Dear Catherine,
   I appreciate you so much for all you bring to us. I have looked to you for guidance for many years and especially now in these turbulent, scary times. You are my go to person!! I also looked up to Dr Tenpenny for all of her time and deep diving into vaccines, that is, untill today… I haven’t been refered to as an “abomination” for many, many years. Wow, that was a punch in the gut! I really felt the world had progressed from that mind set. Apparently I was wrong. I had no idea she felt this way. I was going to do her boot camp but now I know “my kind” wouldn’t be welcome. With her comments she has chosen to alient a whole group of human beings. I thought we were all working collectively….. gay, straight, conservative, liberal, black, white, asian, poor, rich etc. to fight Mr Global. How do I support someone when they feel I am an “abomination”? I know there are much bigger issues going on right now than me being hurt by her comments, but I just had to say how disappointed I am that Dr Tenpenny feels this way. Thanks to Josephine and Barbara for their comments. Well said!

   1. Dr. Tenpenny is not the only one I have encountered in the fight against Mr. Global with reactionary “Burn the witches!”-type thoughts that express an underlying sentiment of building back an Old Testamentic world of guilt and penalty.

      We shall definitely overcome Mr. Global together, but what kind of new culture will we then constitute? My hope is a real brotherhood of man!

      1. I hope this too.

   2. You are not alone; there are many of us in this Solari comment stream who have commented similarly. It seems we are also confused at the neutral reaction from Catherine on blind hatred of this kind. I suppose we shall see. There has to be a way to kindly address this issue while moving forward in the agenda for Freedom (for everyone!)

Comments are closed.