Solari North American Video Server

“Today, four companies produce 84 percent of our beef. Four companies control the world’s grain market. Six corporations control 90 percent of the media. Ten companies control everything you buy. Three companies completely dominate the farm equipment market. Fourteen companies control the entire global auto industry. You get the idea. This extends to many different industries where giant global corporations are gobbling up everything in sight. How did we get to this point?” ~ Patrick Wood, “Monopoly Power Is Growing In Response To Sustainable Development”

By Catherine Austin Fitts

Technocracy is a global system designed to implement central resource management and control through rules-based micromanagement. The growth of technocracy is made possible by digital systems and software, artificial intelligence, and the “one way mirror” managed through 24/7 surveillance by intelligence and enforcement agencies—funded by our tax dollars.

The beauty of technocracy is that it can be integrated into a wide variety of political and corporate systems. While the U.S. promotes the notion of markets and democratic process, our systems can be converted to technocracy with the integration of an endless stream of government, banking, and corporate rules and algorithms that manage and control our daily lives and infrastructure. The same process is rolling out in the one-party system of China and also via mind-numbing regulation by multiple coalition governments and institutions of the European Union.

Seeing and documenting this process is challenging. It requires integration of complex operations across many different industries and governments—and it is protected by extraordinary secrecy afforded to the military-industrial complex and the central banks.

Despite the challenges, publisher and economist Patrick M. Wood has succeeded in making the technocracy invasion visible. Patrick is the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation and Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order. Technocracy Rising is listed in the Solari Report Best Books for 2018 and Best Books for 2019 (login with your Solari Report password) published in our last two Annual Wrap Ups.

Familiarity with technocracy is essential knowledge for understanding and navigating the modern world. Among other things, technocracy is the process by which small businesses and enterprises are driven out of business, intentionally creating larger market share and monopoly profit margins for large corporations. Many of us are managing the increased workload and expense of growing technocracy. Understanding the phenomenon makes a difference in managing the regulatory game.

Our movie is the classic Gaslight, which Patrick refers to in our discussion about technocracy. Gaslighting is “a form of psychological manipulation that seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or in members of a targeted group, making them question their own memory, perception, and sanity. Using persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction, and lying, it attempts to destabilize the victim and delegitimize the victim’s belief.” (Wikipedia).

Gaslighting is one of the tactics that the media and intelligence agencies use to outwit individuals who stand in the way of technocracy. We will talk about this more in Deep State Tactics 101 that I will cover later this month on The Solari Report.

Subscribers can e-mail or post questions and story suggestions for Money & Markets for this week here.

Not a subscriber yet? You are invited to join here!

89 Comments

  2. As I read Robert Lord’s comment on technocracy as “an important subject that is shaping our lives and our civilization,” I wonder if the following fits that category also.
    (My own memory of being taken in by propaganda dates to the era of Eisenhower who declared that the US was not flying the U2 spy planes over Russia.… until 4 years later, they shot one down… over Russian territory.) Alex Carey was an Australian sociologist. The corps were well organized by the 1920s. They were spending one $B a year by the 1970s. Imagine focusing one’s intellect(?) so intently for this purpose. I can’t.

    Alex Carey: Corporations and Propaganda, Part ONE of TWO – From the 1920s to the 1980s.
    http://tucradio.org/podcasts/newest-podcasts/alex-carey-corporations-and-propaganda-part-one-of-two/

    Alex Carey: Corporations and Propaganda, Part TWO of TWO – TUC Radio
    http://tucradio.org/podcasts/newest-podcasts/alex-carey-corporations-and-propaganda-part-two-of-two/

    May we be resilient, May we be healthy, May we be aware.
    Addi J

    1. Adaline

      The U2 was not shot down, it was sabotaged.

      What supports that is the type of camera that was installed in the plane, the high tech camera was replaced with a much older model. The crown jewel of the U2 was the camera and whoever sabotaged the plane make sure the Soviets didn’t it.

      1. Harry Blazer covered in detail in Deep State Part I. Worth listening too.

  3. As I read Robert Lord’s comment on technocracy as “an important subject that is shaping our lives and our civilization,” I wonder if the following fits that category also.
    (My own memory of being taken in by propaganda dates to the era of Eisenhower who declared that the US was not flying the U2 spy planes over Russia.… until 4 years later, they shot one down… over Russian territory.) Alex Carey was an Australian sociologist. The corps were well organized by the 1920s. They were spending one $B a year by the 1970s. Imagine focusing one’s intellect(?) so intently for this purpose. I can’t.

    Alex Carey: Corporations and Propaganda, Part ONE of TWO – From the 1920s to the 1980s.
    http://tucradio.org/podcasts/newest-podcasts/alex-carey-corporations-and-propaganda-part-one-of-two/

    Alex Carey: Corporations and Propaganda, Part TWO of TWO – TUC Radio
    http://tucradio.org/podcasts/newest-podcasts/alex-carey-corporations-and-propaganda-part-two-of-two/

    May we be resilient, May we be healthy, May we be aware.
    Addi J

    1. Adaline

      The U2 was not shot down, it was sabotaged.

      What supports that is the type of camera that was installed in the plane, the high tech camera was replaced with a much older model. The crown jewel of the U2 was the camera and whoever sabotaged the plane make sure the Soviets didn’t it.

      1. Harry Blazer covered in detail in Deep State Part I. Worth listening too.

  4. Finally listened to this.
    Really fabulous interview.
    I can’t believe Patrick collaborated with Antony Sutton, who peeled back many of the most breath taking – and fully heretical to Technocracy dogma – truths from the Bolshevik Revolution thru WWII.
    That living connection is hugely relevant and important to understanding where we are today. For instance, it’s impossible to understand the contemporary Russia phenomenon today without the fully documented historical context of Sutton/Wood.
    Thanks!

      1. A couple of the interviews most salient, if subtle, points were Catherine’s comments on:
        1. technocratic “hyper-materialism” working to integrate the demonic into our daily lives (@ 50 mins), and
        2. “divide and conquer” being a core tactic to tear society apart (end of interview), which she is struggling to convey more clearly.
        I would only add that the most demonic form of “divide and conquer” is inducing a culture toward fraticide/suicide/infanticide/etc.
        Maybe Solari might consider articulating in one report the long history of hyper-demonic, intra-cultural divide-and-conquer schemes, with the goal of helping subscribers grasp the breadth of demonic horror and scale of evil confronting us.
        Which of course leaves us no choice but to yearn for a higher spiritual power, if we are to have any chance overcoming demonic evil.

        1. Great idea, James. I will think about how to do it. I am in the process of recording and publishing the Deep State Tactics series. More on Divide and Conquer is a logical follow up. Could also make it a Wrap Up theme. I am going to look around to see who has already done this to see if I can pull them in.

          1. Gonz Shimura , I gave you his card in Asheville. He is on twitter “facelikethe sun”

  5. Finally listened to this.
    Really fabulous interview.
    I can’t believe Patrick collaborated with Antony Sutton, who peeled back many of the most breath taking – and fully heretical to Technocracy dogma – truths from the Bolshevik Revolution thru WWII.
    That living connection is hugely relevant and important to understanding where we are today. For instance, it’s impossible to understand the contemporary Russia phenomenon today without the fully documented historical context of Sutton/Wood.
    Thanks!

      1. A couple of the interviews most salient, if subtle, points were Catherine’s comments on:
        1. technocratic “hyper-materialism” working to integrate the demonic into our daily lives (@ 50 mins), and
        2. “divide and conquer” being a core tactic to tear society apart (end of interview), which she is struggling to convey more clearly.
        I would only add that the most demonic form of “divide and conquer” is inducing a culture toward fraticide/suicide/infanticide/etc.
        Maybe Solari might consider articulating in one report the long history of hyper-demonic, intra-cultural divide-and-conquer schemes, with the goal of helping subscribers grasp the breadth of demonic horror and scale of evil confronting us.
        Which of course leaves us no choice but to yearn for a higher spiritual power, if we are to have any chance overcoming demonic evil.

        1. Great idea, James. I will think about how to do it. I am in the process of recording and publishing the Deep State Tactics series. More on Divide and Conquer is a logical follow up. Could also make it a Wrap Up theme. I am going to look around to see who has already done this to see if I can pull them in.

          1. Gonz Shimura , I gave you his card in Asheville. He is on twitter “facelikethe sun”

  6. Dear Catherine
    Regarding hyper-materialism, I like the idea of the 4 quadrants. I’m trying to reconstruct the chart you made, but I’m a bit confused. Can you please help?
    Is the “invisible” the same thing as the “covert” or is it a sub-set of the “overt”?

    1. Invisible is everything that you can see with a naked eye – so it is not concrete. In the material world what is happening covertly or EMF radiation or gravity or shared intelligence in the morphogenic field are all invisible. In the spiritual world, spiritual intelligence – some call it demons and angels – are invisible unless they allow themselves to appear in physical form. Whether you consider our electromagnetic fields material or spiritual, they are invisible. Does that help? Please keep asking if you don’t. Part of our challenge is that the covert operators organize to do as much as possible in ways that are invisible – and science and technology continue to expand what can be done invisibly.

  7. Dear Catherine
    Regarding hyper-materialism, I like the idea of the 4 quadrants. I’m trying to reconstruct the chart you made, but I’m a bit confused. Can you please help?
    Is the “invisible” the same thing as the “covert” or is it a sub-set of the “overt”?

    1. Invisible is everything that you can see with a naked eye – so it is not concrete. In the material world what is happening covertly or EMF radiation or gravity or shared intelligence in the morphogenic field are all invisible. In the spiritual world, spiritual intelligence – some call it demons and angels – are invisible unless they allow themselves to appear in physical form. Whether you consider our electromagnetic fields material or spiritual, they are invisible. Does that help? Please keep asking if you don’t. Part of our challenge is that the covert operators organize to do as much as possible in ways that are invisible – and science and technology continue to expand what can be done invisibly.

Comments are closed.