Skip to content
Vaccine Campaign

The U.S. government will pay for any vaccination program against the H1N1 swine flu, and may encourage schools to help vaccinate children, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said on Thursday.
The government is also considering buying even more antiviral drugs, including more of GlaxoSmithKline’s inhaled drug Relenza and pediatric doses of Roche AG’s Tamiflu, officials told a swine flu “summit” at the National Institutes of Health.
Continue Reading U.S. Government to Pay For Flu Vaccine Campaign
9 Comments
Comments are closed.
If they’re mandatory I would guess the “OP” is who owns your body you or them. There’s obviously no black death going around. So to get a vaccine either shows your clueless to whats going on or you bowed to authority even though it might kill you. Probably the biggest factor is whos authority. Not your local doctor but the WHO global authority.
Becoming informed on the legal action currently undertaken by the Austrian journalist Jane Burgemeister against the WHO and others should enlighten as to what the agenda and issues are………….they make disturbing reading….regards……LEE
I don’t think this is about a bio attack, but I do think this is about big $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$! You have two players in any con game, the played and the player. The player is the guy on the inside making cash and the played are all the fools that can’t see through this thin veil of BS.
Here’s a real world example, my Mom called her doctor last week because she was feeling ill. She described her symptoms over the phone to the doctor and his conclusion was that she had the flu. When she said, “What kind of flu?” without hesitation the doctor said, “Swine flu!” His solution was Tamiflu and wired the prescription to her local pharmacy.
Now, when she called me and told me this I was floored. I screamed, “He diagnosed you over the phone and then gave you a prescription?!?!” To me this was astounding because I’ve lived in Asia since 1995 and there was no such thing as over-the-phone prescriptions before I left. I mean, I knew Big Pharm was out of control since Bush took office but I didn’t really know how bad it had gotten.
Point is, it has gotten to be like stealing candy from a baby for Big Pharm. Why not dig a failed business strategy up from 1976 and try it again but this time even bigger? The average person can only remember who the last American Idol winner was anyway so why not???
Cynical, well yes, how can I not be???
Hmmmm.
Why all the pre-publicity for the vaccine and such large preparations? Seems if they were going in the directions suggested, that this would be highly covert activity. The fact that all of this is so widely publicized leads me searching for other motives that would explain the high visibility.
Just about everyone I’ve spoken to about this issue says that they won’t take the vaccine even if forced. Am I speaking to outliers, or are others hearing this too? If this position is gaining traction, then I would speculate that it is a deliberate outcome. If deliberate, then why?
get rid of those who oppose the program, bert?
Perma,
Now you’re thinking. That’s logical and fits within their typical technique-set. You know, I fear that many of the 911-Truth groups, patriot groups, Internet shock jock listeners and the like have been established for the same purpose…. to get us to self-identify.
What an ugly world these sociopaths inhabit. I despise having to try to think like them. But I think it’s essential for humanity’s survival. The better we become at thinking like them the better chance we have to thwart their devious plans.
We must not be complicit in our own demise. We must act as the “Last Men”… as O’Brien said to Winston in 1984. We must not let this succeed.
The viral attack is not going to be a direct one on humans, via Swine Flu, but via the food supply, because public will refuse the vaccines. This NYT times article provides clues….
Bill Seeks to End Antibiotic Use to Spur Animal Growth
NYT
By GARDINER HARRIS
Published: July 13, 2009
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration announced Monday that it would seek to ban many routine uses of antibiotics in farm animals in hopes of reducing the spread of dangerous bacteria in humans.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/14/health/policy/14fda.html?_r=5&hp