This 6-pillar curriculum teaches the basic literacy we need to be personally and financially successful and to do so in a manner in which together we evolve a culture that supports the emergence of an advanced human civilization.
Exotic Weapons, Hidden Networks, Covert Wars, and 9/11
with Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
“Perhaps the question of the ultimate culprit of the 9/11 terror bombings can be solved if approached through the technical means used to destroy the Twin Towers. The murder weapon classically leads to the murderer.”
~ Laurent Guyénot, JFK – 9/11: 50 Years of Deep State
When disasters such as wildfires, hurricanes, and earthquakes occur, people on the ground no longer automatically assume that these events are “acts of God.” The reported anomalies suggest to many the covert deployment of exotic weapons. Dr. Joseph P. Farrell returns to discuss the evidence that points to the existence of such weapons.
Elze:
You did an exceptionally nice interview with Dr. Farrell. I started reading his books in 2013. Fortunately, I started with LBJ and the Conspiracy to Kill Kennedy. I had some familiarity with the topic and it seemed to be written in Dr. Farrell’s “voice” so the reading was not difficult.
For some reason, that I still don’t understand, I thought Dr. Farrell’s work was important and decided to start reading the books in the order they were written. It was way over my head and I read the first couple of Giza books with a dictionary on the table next to me.
At the time, Georgeann Hughes, of the Byte Show, was interviewing Dr. Farrell about his books. The dictionary was helpful but not nearly as helpful as those interviews in helping me wade, flounder and swim through the first few books. Your two interviews with Dr. Farrell bring that same quality of conversation and understanding to his very prolific and complex work.
What has been so fascinating to me was that when a person decided to try to figure out what was happening in the world, no matter where a person started learning (theology, finance, history, physics, real estate) they ended up in the same place…chatting together in interviews.
As you noted in one of your responses, Dr. Farrell’s work pulls many of these threads together in his books and in his interviews.
Many thanks to you and Dr. Farrell, as well as Solari, for publishing these interviews.
I do hope they bring more people to Dr. Farrell’s books and website. There are some wicked smart subscribers over there with questions that are still above my head;)
Fascinating – I’m at the 1:30: mark and will at finish this interview later (priority). Thank you. I’ve never looked beyond Judy Wood (and her beautifully illustrated book “Where Did the Towers Go?” – via David Hughes). A question came up for me – I’ve heard that the twin towers (so much symbology) was designed to withstand planes flying into it (?). Any thoughts as to the design being influenced as to be taken down by LENR+ ?
It seems as if the design of the towers is exceptionally well suited for microwave interferometry. Was this on purpose? That would be a very good follow up question for one of the ‘Vidchats’.
The title of the book is:
“Hidden Finance, Rogue Networks, and Secret Sorcery: The Fascist International, 9/11, and Penetrated Operations”.
It was published in 2016. It discusses the exotic weaponry.
And, it presents us with many questions that are still in need of answers..
Please also see the links I have added under the commentary, these contain a wealth of additional information of Dr. Farrell’s commentary on patents, papers, technologies and anomalies observed during suspicious events.
Zionists are wannabe Nazis. They are racial supremacists, expansionist, genocidal, and have a militant ethos.
Yes, Atta received grant money from the Duisberg society for his research trip to Cairo but he was not a member. I would assume German intelligence had some involvement with 9/11 considering all the pilots studied in Hamburg, a very unlikely place.
In a recent interview with Tom-Oliver Regenauer I heard about Moses Hess for the first time. Regenauer discusses the hidden connection between Zionism, Marx & Social Democracy, all originating from Moses Hess. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oypT09chW1s
Hess is on my list of things to investigate further.
Yes, excellent point. I often focus on US, British and Israeli intelligence working together, but German intelligence is often in the mix. The Operation Gladio networks seems to be fused and many of these operations are multi-jurisdictional intelligence teams. Helps to protect secrecy.
In the interests of providing a bit of robust feedback:
Regarding Germany: As Richard Werner has pointed out (in his discussion with TuckerC), there was never an accepted peace treaty with Germany. Germany has no constitution, only a “Grundgesetz” (Basic law). And there were “Besatzungsrechte” (Occupying powers’ rights), the continued existence of which, people in German government seem extremely reticent to talk about. A simple search on the subject throws up the “Two-plus-four-treaty”, which was signed in 1990 by France, USSR, USA. In principle this states that “The united Germany shall have accordingly full sovereignty over its internal and external affairs. However, it seems more than suspicious that as recently as 2007, Germany was still passing laws titled “Gesetz zur Bereinigung des Besatzungsrechts”. (Law to tidy the occupiers’ rights). (This trail contains some of the most nebulous and obfuscating legal texts I have ever seen, all covered with the fog of wikipedia).
Thus, the sovereignty and independence of Germany around 9/11 presents a particularly interesting case. On the one hand, Gerhard Schröder, German Chancellor from ’99 to ’05 kept Germany out of the Iraq war, and in the build-up, the entire German press was free to point out stuff like the risible performance of Colin Powell in the UN. On the other hand, the mainstream German media were totally de-platforming journalists who stepped too far questioning the 9/11 narrative. (e.g. Spiegel journalist Wisnewski was fired for supposedly misrepresenting his interview with the Mayor of Shanksville.) I really wonder what was happening behind the scenes.
Microwave interferometer / High energy / HAARP / WTC outer shell as some sort of circuit components / Inner columns as another sort of component / Nukes. Low frequencies, high frequencies, bits of metal with no relation in shape size or form to what energy they are supposed (?) to be transmitting / catching / whatever. Tesla’s “never worked / what actually was the concept?” Wardenclyffe tower even looks a bit like a prototype Royal Navy (Sampson) phased array radar. Sorry, but without some solid detail it sounds like a garbled load of techno-babble.
Sure, someone could use a conventional explosive to scatter radioactive material, which has sometimes been termed a dirty bomb, or a“tactical nuclear weapon”, but given that it has often been stated that “this or that missile could be used to carry a nuclear warhead”, by now we should have already had a proper nuclear conflict, because as soon as any “could-carry-a-nuke” missile was spotted, enemies would have to assume that it was a nuke and reply in kind. (Aside from any technical discussions about the impossible task of maintaining a fission explosion reaction, or discussions about the veracity of narratives surrounding Hiroshima/Nagasaki/ManhattenProject) etc. etc. Surely the whole “nuclear scare” was just that – a scare.
One of my former clients lived in the 27th (or so) floor in the 40’s in Manhattan. On that day she saw a. military cargo type plane flying by her as she stood on the balcony and fly down into one of the builders.
I would point out that it is inconceivable to me that any investor worth his salt would depend on an operation that was dependent on just one technology/complete destruction. You would want multiple ways of bringing those buildings. The savings on the asbestos clean up would have justified just about any expense.
Elze:
You did an exceptionally nice interview with Dr. Farrell. I started reading his books in 2013. Fortunately, I started with LBJ and the Conspiracy to Kill Kennedy. I had some familiarity with the topic and it seemed to be written in Dr. Farrell’s “voice” so the reading was not difficult.
For some reason, that I still don’t understand, I thought Dr. Farrell’s work was important and decided to start reading the books in the order they were written. It was way over my head and I read the first couple of Giza books with a dictionary on the table next to me.
At the time, Georgeann Hughes, of the Byte Show, was interviewing Dr. Farrell about his books. The dictionary was helpful but not nearly as helpful as those interviews in helping me wade, flounder and swim through the first few books. Your two interviews with Dr. Farrell bring that same quality of conversation and understanding to his very prolific and complex work.
What has been so fascinating to me was that when a person decided to try to figure out what was happening in the world, no matter where a person started learning (theology, finance, history, physics, real estate) they ended up in the same place…chatting together in interviews.
As you noted in one of your responses, Dr. Farrell’s work pulls many of these threads together in his books and in his interviews.
Many thanks to you and Dr. Farrell, as well as Solari, for publishing these interviews.
I do hope they bring more people to Dr. Farrell’s books and website. There are some wicked smart subscribers over there with questions that are still above my head;)
Thank you, that is a big compliment! The interviews with GeorgeAnn Hughes are so informative.
Fascinating – I’m at the 1:30: mark and will at finish this interview later (priority). Thank you. I’ve never looked beyond Judy Wood (and her beautifully illustrated book “Where Did the Towers Go?” – via David Hughes). A question came up for me – I’ve heard that the twin towers (so much symbology) was designed to withstand planes flying into it (?). Any thoughts as to the design being influenced as to be taken down by LENR+ ?
It seems as if the design of the towers is exceptionally well suited for microwave interferometry. Was this on purpose? That would be a very good follow up question for one of the ‘Vidchats’.
The link to his book looks to point to an older book. Is there a book entitled Exotic Weapons and 911?
The title of the book is:
“Hidden Finance, Rogue Networks, and Secret Sorcery: The Fascist International, 9/11, and Penetrated Operations”.
It was published in 2016. It discusses the exotic weaponry.
And, it presents us with many questions that are still in need of answers..
Please also see the links I have added under the commentary, these contain a wealth of additional information of Dr. Farrell’s commentary on patents, papers, technologies and anomalies observed during suspicious events.
Start at 3:10 – he walks through all the books and the video shows most of the covers.
Great interview , Elzethank you for asking excellence questions and thank you.
Sorry for my jumbled up comment but hope it makes sense
Zionists are wannabe Nazis. They are racial supremacists, expansionist, genocidal, and have a militant ethos.
Yes, Atta received grant money from the Duisberg society for his research trip to Cairo but he was not a member. I would assume German intelligence had some involvement with 9/11 considering all the pilots studied in Hamburg, a very unlikely place.
In a recent interview with Tom-Oliver Regenauer I heard about Moses Hess for the first time. Regenauer discusses the hidden connection between Zionism, Marx & Social Democracy, all originating from Moses Hess.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oypT09chW1s
Hess is on my list of things to investigate further.
Also, excellent commentary on Russia. Although, I’m not sure whether or not thats actually happening.
Yes, excellent point. I often focus on US, British and Israeli intelligence working together, but German intelligence is often in the mix. The Operation Gladio networks seems to be fused and many of these operations are multi-jurisdictional intelligence teams. Helps to protect secrecy.
In the interests of providing a bit of robust feedback:
Regarding Germany: As Richard Werner has pointed out (in his discussion with TuckerC), there was never an accepted peace treaty with Germany. Germany has no constitution, only a “Grundgesetz” (Basic law). And there were “Besatzungsrechte” (Occupying powers’ rights), the continued existence of which, people in German government seem extremely reticent to talk about. A simple search on the subject throws up the “Two-plus-four-treaty”, which was signed in 1990 by France, USSR, USA. In principle this states that “The united Germany shall have accordingly full sovereignty over its internal and external affairs. However, it seems more than suspicious that as recently as 2007, Germany was still passing laws titled “Gesetz zur Bereinigung des Besatzungsrechts”. (Law to tidy the occupiers’ rights). (This trail contains some of the most nebulous and obfuscating legal texts I have ever seen, all covered with the fog of wikipedia).
Thus, the sovereignty and independence of Germany around 9/11 presents a particularly interesting case. On the one hand, Gerhard Schröder, German Chancellor from ’99 to ’05 kept Germany out of the Iraq war, and in the build-up, the entire German press was free to point out stuff like the risible performance of Colin Powell in the UN. On the other hand, the mainstream German media were totally de-platforming journalists who stepped too far questioning the 9/11 narrative. (e.g. Spiegel journalist Wisnewski was fired for supposedly misrepresenting his interview with the Mayor of Shanksville.) I really wonder what was happening behind the scenes.
Microwave interferometer / High energy / HAARP / WTC outer shell as some sort of circuit components / Inner columns as another sort of component / Nukes. Low frequencies, high frequencies, bits of metal with no relation in shape size or form to what energy they are supposed (?) to be transmitting / catching / whatever. Tesla’s “never worked / what actually was the concept?” Wardenclyffe tower even looks a bit like a prototype Royal Navy (Sampson) phased array radar. Sorry, but without some solid detail it sounds like a garbled load of techno-babble.
Sure, someone could use a conventional explosive to scatter radioactive material, which has sometimes been termed a dirty bomb, or a“tactical nuclear weapon”, but given that it has often been stated that “this or that missile could be used to carry a nuclear warhead”, by now we should have already had a proper nuclear conflict, because as soon as any “could-carry-a-nuke” missile was spotted, enemies would have to assume that it was a nuke and reply in kind. (Aside from any technical discussions about the impossible task of maintaining a fission explosion reaction, or discussions about the veracity of narratives surrounding Hiroshima/Nagasaki/ManhattenProject) etc. etc. Surely the whole “nuclear scare” was just that – a scare.
Regards, Nick
One of my former clients lived in the 27th (or so) floor in the 40’s in Manhattan. On that day she saw a. military cargo type plane flying by her as she stood on the balcony and fly down into one of the builders.
I would point out that it is inconceivable to me that any investor worth his salt would depend on an operation that was dependent on just one technology/complete destruction. You would want multiple ways of bringing those buildings. The savings on the asbestos clean up would have justified just about any expense.
Joseph, if you would put your books out in audio form it would be great for those of us who learn better by hearing books and articles. Thanks.