
Money & Markets Report: September 17, 2026
Become a member: Subscribe
- Money & Markets
- Weekly Solari Reports
- Cognitive Liberty
- Solari Builders
- Ask Catherine
- News Trends & Stories
- Equity Overview
- War For Bankocracy
- Digital Money, Digital Control
- State Leader Briefings
- Food
- Food for the Soul
- Future Science
- Health
- Metanoia
- Solutions
- Spiritual Science
- Wellness
- Building Wealth
- Via Europa
Solari’s Building Wealth materials are organized to inspire and support your personal strategic and financial planning.

Missing Money
Articles and video discussions of the $21 Trillion dollars missing from the U.S. government
No posts
- LATEST
- TOP SECTIONS
- SERIES
- Money & Markets
- Weekly Solari Reports
- Ask Catherine
- News Trends & Stories
- Equity Overview
- Cognitive Liberty
- Solari Builders
- Building Wealth
- The War for Bankocracy
- Digital Money, Digital Control
- State Leader Briefings
- Food
- Food for the Soul
- Future Science
- Health
- Metanoia
- Solutions
- Spiritual Science
- Wellness
- Via Europa
- BLOGS
- RESOURCES
- COMMUNITY
- My Account
- Log In
- Subscribe
- Search
- Shop
- Support
- Donate
- Log Out
John Titus and Catherine Austin Fitts discuss a “Back to the Future” theme, arguing current events repeat past patterns with darker consequences. They cover a secret Treasury/FinCEN SAR database allegedly used by Border Patrol “pre-crime” teams to tip off local police, tying it to asset forfeiture incentives and urging viewers to “know your banker.” They review Middle East escalation, Houthi advances controlling the Bab el-Mandeb, rising diesel and food prices, and warnings from oil executives as reserves and buffers run down; they also cite reports of massive US bomb transfers to Israel and link the conflict to energy control and a “Greater Israel” agenda. The episode critiques European independence movements favoring the EU, questions AfD’s oligarch backing, tracks worsening US corruption perceptions and consumer sentiment, highlights rationing and shortages, and contrasts BRICS payment-system interoperability and gold settlement plans with US stablecoin/tokenization ambitions and AI’s push for public subsidy and control.
Log in or subscribe to the Solari Report to enjoy full access to exclusive articles and features.
Already a subscriber?
- Weekly interviews, including the popular Money & Markets show
- Quarterly deep dives into major trends affecting you day-to-day
- Aggregation of the most relevant news stories
- Subscriber-only events and a digital platform to connect with other subscribers
- Weekly subscriber Q&A sessions with Catherine and the Solari team
60 Comments
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
















































































































Catherine,
If Trump pushes a 5K stimulus it will be automatically added to my bank account. How does one reject it?
During Covid, I mailed the stimulus they put into my account back.
I’m still watching but not finished yet. So much info to consider. I am still sort of stuck on the 3 Technates idea especially after hearing the Bric idea India, Russia and China. N American Technate = Canada, US, S. America and Greenland ( Gulf of Mexico T wants to call gulf of America). Middle East Technate= Greater Israel and West Technate China, Russia and India. (Surely more will be cluster in those technates). It seems to me this idea may have been agreed upon in the past and much of wars are theater right now. It also seems like Iran may be the only bigger more powerful country not in agreement. I am even considering Iran may now also be in agreement. ( after all the top general , Ayatollah Khamenei and other killed early on)
What also seems like it can be happening now is N. American Technate is starting to double cross that original agreement.
I don’t know but there are many fishy things that seem planned well in advance to completely change our worldwide wide geography. AKA= world reset.
Hope my comment makes some sort of sense.
Thank You for Money and Markets it is a weather of information.
Yes, this is planned out way ahead of time and being implemented by a fusion on Five Eyes multinational military and intelligence operations.
In the 1970’s The Club of Rome introduced their map of the future dividing into sections with North America including America, Canada, and Greenland.
I appreciate your reply and sharing your perspective
Wealth of info not weather
Analysis is a product of experience and center of attention, the $9 fuel in California may indeed look like a short term causation. It is this administration.
But if you have lived in a jurisdiction, Cali, committed to eliminating gas vehicles and appliances, has one party management focused on reducing carbon footprint, emphasizing UN 2030, WEF agenda, open borders, novel energy sources and implementing policies designed to force infrastructure to be turned off; well then, it is no surprise the infrastructure can’t surge let alone make sufficient anything.
A suggestion for Solari’s consideration, a salon style discussion on what it would take for a country (state actors) to become self sufficient would be great.
I think a lot of the US infrastructure deterioration is due to the weather manipulation – chemtrails, etc. Bridges are rusting and scalding badly. Around me, three major bridges have ongoing emergency work underway.
Usually a well built bridge can last a long time if you keep it properly painted. The spraying may wear the paint down faster. I saw what it did to my house in TN. Had to get a pressure washer and it still is a huge job keeping it clean. Constant grey film. Makes you think a lot about what it is doing to our skin and lungs.
And during this time of year in West TN a person combats stink bugs.
Reason and free will do not reside in the brain. Interesting comments about deep brain implants for medical purposes, Musk’s neurolink, the soul, etc.
Does the Soul Exist Outside the Brain?
https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/does-the-immortal-soul-exist-insights-from-a-neurosurgeon-dr-michael-egnor-5953716
Today Martin Armstrong posted the linked article. I watched the video about the protests and how they were expecting more students that are being bussed in for the protest. Bussed in means probably organized and the video mention that there was a booth for Revolutionary Communist Party.
So I started thinking, are they really planning to go to war or are they herding students into a political party for the Globalist’s world government?
Other strange things – Michael Yon said he wouldn’t be surprised (or something like that) if the Gulf State and Israel would be gone soon. And I started wondering if they are clearing out the Ukraine to be the head of a Technate, which would include the Gulf states and Israel. I have only ever seen the map of the American Technate, so what are their plans for the rest of the world?
I know this sounds crazy, but we live in a crazy world, run by psychopaths.
I have long thought that the Israeli leadership were planning on moving major operations up to the Ukraine after they finished exporting and exterminating the Ukranians as part of the Greater Israel project. That said, no matter what the plans are the world is very, very fluid.
Forgot the link –
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/germany/germanys-young-people-are-saying-we-will-not-fight-your-war/
About the question about war is it coming….Perhaps we should not look at the current confrontation with Russia merely as a conflict between states, but also as a clash between historical systems of power seeking to preserve their own continuity.
Viewed through the systemic work of Bert Hellinger, an uncomfortable question emerges.
The Kingdom of the Netherlands did not simply come into existence in 1815. It was constructed within a European power structure in which dynasties, Great Britain, Russia, territory, colonial possessions and enormous financial interests were deeply intertwined. When Belgium seceded, William I did not merely lose territory: the very order over which he ruled literally fell apart.
Almost two centuries later, the House of Orange still exists, and the head of state still carries the symbolism of authority, territory and power. At the same time, monarchs, governments, international financial institutions, security organisations, multinational corporations and informal meeting places such as Bilderberg operate within international networks where national and transnational power intersect.
From a Hellingerian perspective, therefore, the question is not merely who is politically right today, but:
What system is actually speaking here — and how old is that system?
What happens when people who themselves carry family histories of power, war, loss, colonialism, authoritarian rule or geopolitical conflict come to occupy positions within institutions that carry those histories as well?
This is where intergenerational trauma becomes politically relevant. Not because we can claim, without evidence, that a king, queen or elite consciously intends to settle an old score. Quite the opposite.
The much deeper possibility is that no one has to consciously intend it at all.
Within Hellinger’s way of thinking, a system can attempt, through loyalties, orders and unacknowledged loss, to restore what previous generations have lost. People can become carriers of a movement whose origins are far older than their own lives.
This gives the current preoccupation with territory, security, spheres of influence, enemies, and the “restoration” or “protection” of a European order a very different research question:
What are they really defending? The safety of people living today — or also a historical power structure attempting to preserve itself through successive generations and institutions?
And perhaps this is the systemic question that should precede every new war:
Which dead, which losses, debts, humiliations and old claims are still sitting invisibly at the table — and what would happen if we finally acknowledged them instead of making yet another generation fight them out?
My question, therefore, is this:
Who is willing to look at what is actually operating at that level — and who has the courage to transform it into something that serves human dignity, peace and prosperity?
Because I do not believe we can expect that transformation to come from within the military and intelligence structures themselves. Across the world, the people operating inside those structures are embedded in systems whose internal logic is built around threat, security, secrecy, loyalty and the preservation of power. The deeper question is therefore whether those systems are capable of examining and transforming the very assumptions on which their own existence depends.