A Short Preview:

“Psychiatry has been the enforcer of choice used by strong-arm governments for as long as it has existed.”
~ Peter and Ginger Breggin

By Catherine Austin Fitts

This week, I welcome Dr. Peter Breggin back to the Solari Report for a very important conversation about how to protect our children from the dangerous weaponization of mental health. There is no one more qualified to thoughtfully discuss this topic.

It is essential that parents understand and learn to protect their children from the sophisticated tools that Mr. Global is using to harvest children’s bodies, minds, and data. The threats can come from multiple directions; medical-pharmaceutical interventions (e.g., antidepressants, vaccines, transgender surgery), smartphones that deliver entrainment, and “woke” curricula are just a few examples. The all-important parent-child relationship is also under attack—though parents will remain financially liable for any harms that result.

Teaching children how to protect themselves in this environment goes far beyond the standard advice “not to talk to strangers.” Breggin emphasizes that protection begins with creating a loving home environment—characterized by both discipline and respect—that teaches children to treasure themselves, and with parents setting aside meaningful time for their children. Practical steps also include limiting time online and maximizing time in nature.

This is a topic that I hope parents, parents-to-be, and grandparents will take seriously.

Money & Markets:

In Money & Markets this week, John Titus and I will cover the latest events and continue to discuss the financial and geopolitical trends Solari is tracking in 2023—and the pushback rocking and rolling us around the globe. Post questions at the Money & Markets commentary here.

Related Solari Reports:

Heads Up from Catherine: Weaponization of Mental Health

Blast from the Past: Week of August 29, 2022: The Weaponization of Mental Health

Transcending Fear with Peter Breggin, MD

Hero of the Week: October 19, 2020 – Peter Breggin, MD

Hero of the Week: February 20, 2020 – Peter Roger Breggin

Let’s Go to the Movies: Week of August 29, 2022: Psychiatry: An Industry of Death

Related Resources:

Breggin.com

Peter R. Breggin MD (Substack)

Peter and Ginger Breggin Exposing the Global Predators (Substack)

The Weaponization of Psychiatry

Dr. Peter Breggin on The Weaponization of Mental Health Edicts

Peter Breggin: What is the Global Predator Profile? (D4CE Symposium IV, June 11, 2022 – Session II: A Long History of Crime and Abuse in Medicine with Catherine Austin Fitts)

Books by Dr. Peter R. Breggin, MD


37 Comments

  1. Catherine,
    What a great interview! Anytime you’re talking to Dr. Breggin it’s such a fascinating discussion. I’m a big supporter in using Myers-Briggs to help people understand each other, as well.

    Since +70% of the world is concrete I think we need a different strategy to try and reach them to wake them up. I’m abstract and I think many of the other journalists in the space are, (yourself, Dr. Farrell, James Corbett, Richard Grove, etc.). Being abstract, we’re great at seeing patterns and discerning where a particular policy/set of decisions will lead in the future.

    But the concrete people have a different world view, they focus on the past and the world of objective facts and data rather than what may happen. The net effect is we have an abundance of abstract journalists talking abstract concepts to a large group of concrete people. We need an approach to journalism and communication that resonates with the concrete audience if we’re going to build momentum and push-back against tyranny.

    I’ve always thought this, it was validating to hear you talk about MBTI in this interview so I wanted to mention my idea. Thank you so much for you and the whole Solari teams hard work!

    -Khyle

    1. That is an excellent point! How can we teach abstract people what concrete people need and how to do it? Do we know who is doing this with success?

      1. Good question! I don’t know anyone doing this with any success. It may not be on anyone’s radar as a need. The concrete-abstract communication gap is almost like speaking two different languages. Perhaps we need a translator? That can translate a message for both groups, isolating the concerns for both cognitive worldviews? Another idea is to work with journalists who are concrete. I’m not sure but Whitney Webb may be concrete. When I read both volumes of One Nation Under Blackmail I was amazed at the level of detail! An emphasis on detail is a concrete cognitive strength.

        1. I find it helps me tremendously to understand these different frameworks – Myers Briggs, and the Abstract- Concrete/Relational – Sequential system (can not remember the name) as well as the DISC system.

          1. I love DISC as well :). I’m going to try and think of best practices for crossing the concrete-abstract communication chasm. Thanks for your feedback, Catherine!

    2. In philosophy this is perhaps the difference between the hyper materialists/rationalists and those who have a sense of the spiritual or non-material world around us.

      Take for example the difference between Freud and Jung, or the difference between people like Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins, versus people like Jordan Peterson and Rupert Sheldrake.

      The first type believe all can be rationally explained or all at least would be possible to explain through science in the future.

      The second type knows that the biggest part of existence is unexplained and irrational and will probably continue to be so, but also funnily enough often have a greater sense of the importance of meaning, in our lives.

      Quite a difference in world view!

      1. What a great point! It sounds like you’re describing the exact same dichotomy, Marlene. If the rationalists outnumber the non-materialists 3 to 1, then we may need to figure out how to speak “rationalist” so they’ll listen (or find someone that can.) 🙂

  2. Catherine,
    Italy has just approved a series of amendments to the psychologists’ ethic code with regard to the treatment of minor patients, namely:
    1) If the psychologist assesses that a patient less than 18 years of age requires treatment, and the parents are against, he/she can impose a psychological treatment through a judge.
    2) abolishment of the professional secret. A psychologist must reveal details of conversations with a patient of a judge requires it or for “unspecified burocratic requirements”.
    3) abolishment of the freedom of choice of the patient.
    4) no need that parents provide their consent if psychologists are invited in schools to discuss delicate issues related to their subject.

    All this is already approved.

    1. They are finishing the complete weaponization of the profession. Better to find a caring friend, an honest priest, a welcoming forest or a good manicurist.

    2. It saddens me to see when Italy is “going the way of the world” when we had such high hopes after those initial passionate speeches from PM Giorgia Meloni.

  3. Here is a heart breaking story from two parents in Kentucky, about the medical system, the child protective service system, the local police and the judges … collaborate to kidnap three children, put them in foster care … the foster parents are paid $2000 per child per month … meanwhile the father, who has a vet pension of $40,000, has to pay ‘child support’ to the govt.???? Meanwhile they have not seen their children in years, and do not currently know where their children are. It is a strong suspicion that the children have been trafficked into sex-work, possibly under the influence of drugging.
    Podcast on Sept 26 2023
    Jeffrey Prather | WHY THE CORRUPT CRAVE OUR CHILDREN!
    https://jeffreyprather.com/why-the-corrupt-crave-our-children/

  4. My son started to be ADD after his father and I separated, he was 5 yrs old (in 1999). Today, after many therapies, my own son’s experience and a lot of readings, I am convinced that most of the children with ADD or ADHD are actually PTSD. I was born in 1964, had a major trauma in 1968 which left me with an ADD (not diagnosted at the time). Following a trauma, a child gets into a survival mode, the brain is not available for learning. The child will find it’s own way to escape into it’s inner world he has constructed. Today, children are classified ADD/ADHD without any investigation into the child’s life. For sensitive and very sensitive children, a trauma will damage their psyche if parents do nothing about it. I also believe that the level of toxins in our world today, starting with all the kids vaccines, are responsible for children health problems, including autism.

    1. I have one colleague who worked with autistic years for many years. She believed that a portion of the withdrawal was because the children knew they could not trust their parents to protect them.

  5. Excellent discussion! I was given a survey such as you describe when I was in 3rd grade, this was in 1973! It was presented as a test. When they said that my parents did not need to know, the first thing I did was tell my Mom. She was incredible at keeping us on alert for the bad actors, and adamant against psychiatry. I remember my mother going to the principal and demanding that her kids, they were 3 of us in the school, were opting out immediately.
    Thank you for the great discussion.

  6. Wow what a great show! Always love to hear Dr. Breggin. I would love to talk with him about my child who has been diagnosed with severe ADHD. Not sure how to make that happen. I’m 57 and my wife just passed away injection related. There was no talking her out getting them. She was a nurse and only believed in the guidelines she was forced to follow. Thank you so much for having him on Catherine.

Comments are closed.