21 Comments

1. Would the US Military be the defacto armed enforcement branch of the BIS? I believe going back 20 years countries such as Iraq, Libya, Syria didn’t fall under the BIS umbrella. Even Libya wanted to trade oil with a gold back currency, that didn’t work out so well for them.

   CBDC will not only be utilized for social control, but more encrypted money laundering, or as far as the BIS is concerned, more efficient money laundering.

   1. Enforcement for the leadership that is represented by the self perpetuating board of the BIS.

2. Thank you for this interview. I had to laugh because I am one of those who read Tragedy and Hope and thought oh, dreadful but not likely in my lifetime!

   My problem today is how does one mend that needed trust between people and governance people? The whole of humanity has a glaring “integrity” issue of the absent kind in most cases. Getting money back is one step but convincing people to develop integrity is quite another.

   1. I think bringing transparency to a number of subjects is a helpful – particularly ones that are blackmailing government leaders:

      Mind control
      EMF radiation
      Weather Warfare
      Chemical and Biological Warfare/Poisoning
      Sovereign Immunitites and Related Overreach
      Illegalities in government expenditures

      The biggest opportunity I see now is to punch the whole in the sovereign immunity overreach.

      I would love to create groups that could help process people out of the sovereign immunity world back to our sid.

3. Interesting “immunity” of BIS members and more, and how that is the big cheese word in global scams.
   They have immunity and are after our immune systems.
   So hoping you might consider releasing this interview to the public!
   Perhaps have Patrick post it on TechnocracyNews ?

   1. This is open to the public. Feel free to pass the link on.

4. Would some of these links be suitable for “Related Reading”?

   Oct 2005, Patrick Wood, Global Banking: The BIS
   Part 1 of 2, https://newswithviews.com/Wood/patrick4.htm
   Part 2 of 2, https://newswithviews.com/Wood/patrick5.htm

   Jan 2006, Patrick Wood, Global Banking: The IMF
   https://www.technocracy.news/global-banking-the-international-monetary-fund/

   May 2015, Valentin Katasonov, BIS and WWII
   https://www.voltairenet.org/article187508.html

   July 2020, Patrick Wood, Dark Past of the BIS
   https://www.technocracy.news/the-dark-past-of-the-bank-for-international-settlements/

   July 2018, book, Patrick Wood, “Globalization and the Crucible of Global Banking”, https://www.technocracy.news/product/globalization-and-the-crucible-of-global-banking/

   1. Thanks for posting Rich.

      1. Imagine if this decision had been implemented?

         “The Bretton Woods Conference, formally known as the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference, was the gathering of 730 delegates from all 44 allied nations at the Mount Washington Hotel situated in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, the United States, to regulate the international monetary and financial order after the conclusion of World War II. The conference was held from 1 to 22 July 1944.

         All of a sudden the issue of the Bank of International Settlements hit the agenda. It was reported that the bank collaborated with fascist Germany. Leaving many details aside, I’d only mention that with great difficulty (some US delegates opposed the motion) the delegates reached an agreement to close the BIS. The decision of international conference has never been enacted.”

         1. Yes, would have been a major change.

5. Thanks for this. Yes, I have always been interested in financial/economic thinking because I am interested in history. When you read the Quigley excerpt ==
   yes, many of us have known for a long long time.. For me since the early 70’s. Two problems: few people will listen. Fewer people will believe it. A huge number of people still think the FED is part of the .gov, not a private bunch of thugs. Second problem: what to do? In fact, we very briefly had power protesting the 2008 bailout BS. But con=gress folded in the end, and O’bomber sold out…

   1. Sold or pre-purchased? https://newrepublic.com/article/137798/important-wikileaks-revelation-isnt-hillary-clinton

6. Who granted them all this immunity? And who would have had the authority to do so? Wonderful interview!

7. Since the directors of the BIS are so fond of the totalitarianism of China, perhaps we should apply Chinese law to them. Therefore the Hague Treaty is nothing more than a historic document and no longer needs to be adhered to or given any weight, just as the Treaty for the transfer of Hong Kong from the UK to China oversight was not supposed to occur until 2047.

   1. Very good point.

Comments are closed.