
Listen to the MP3 audio file
~ The interview continues in Part II here ~
Related Reading:
Blast from the Past: Week of August 1, 2022: The Technocracy Reports with Patrick Wood
BIS: Governors and Heads of Supervision endorse global bank prudential standard for cryptoassets and work programme of Basel Committee
Since the directors of the BIS are so fond of the totalitarianism of China, perhaps we should apply Chinese law to them. Therefore the Hague Treaty is nothing more than a historic document and no longer needs to be adhered to or given any weight, just as the Treaty for the transfer of Hong Kong from the UK to China oversight was not supposed to occur until 2047.
Very good point.
Who granted them all this immunity? And who would have had the authority to do so? Wonderful interview!
Thanks for this. Yes, I have always been interested in financial/economic thinking because I am interested in history. When you read the Quigley excerpt ==
yes, many of us have known for a long long time.. For me since the early 70’s. Two problems: few people will listen. Fewer people will believe it. A huge number of people still think the FED is part of the .gov, not a private bunch of thugs. Second problem: what to do? In fact, we very briefly had power protesting the 2008 bailout BS. But con=gress folded in the end, and O’bomber sold out…
Sold or pre-purchased? https://newrepublic.com/article/137798/important-wikileaks-revelation-isnt-hillary-clinton
Would some of these links be suitable for “Related Reading”?
Oct 2005, Patrick Wood, Global Banking: The BIS
Part 1 of 2, https://newswithviews.com/Wood/patrick4.htm
Part 2 of 2, https://newswithviews.com/Wood/patrick5.htm
Jan 2006, Patrick Wood, Global Banking: The IMF
https://www.technocracy.news/global-banking-the-international-monetary-fund/
May 2015, Valentin Katasonov, BIS and WWII
https://www.voltairenet.org/article187508.html
July 2020, Patrick Wood, Dark Past of the BIS
https://www.technocracy.news/the-dark-past-of-the-bank-for-international-settlements/
July 2018, book, Patrick Wood, “Globalization and the Crucible of Global Banking”, https://www.technocracy.news/product/globalization-and-the-crucible-of-global-banking/
Thanks for posting Rich.
Imagine if this decision had been implemented?
“The Bretton Woods Conference, formally known as the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference, was the gathering of 730 delegates from all 44 allied nations at the Mount Washington Hotel situated in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, the United States, to regulate the international monetary and financial order after the conclusion of World War II. The conference was held from 1 to 22 July 1944.
All of a sudden the issue of the Bank of International Settlements hit the agenda. It was reported that the bank collaborated with fascist Germany. Leaving many details aside, I’d only mention that with great difficulty (some US delegates opposed the motion) the delegates reached an agreement to close the BIS. The decision of international conference has never been enacted.”
Yes, would have been a major change.