Why Reiner Fuellmich Was Guilty

Justin Woods
March 4, 2026

Become a member: Subscribe

Blog

Why Reiner Fuellmich Was Guilty

March 4, 2026

By Catherine Austin Fitts

If you are following the prosecution of Reiner Fuellmich, I recommend Dr. David Hughes’ series on the topic. It is a reminder on why it is important for the new media to do due diligence in complex legal cases.

We have sponsored research and reporting on several complex legal cases in the last two years, with excellent reporting by Taylor Hudak on the wrongful prosecution of Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Roger Ver, and Gideon van Meijeren. We did not attempt to do so for Reiner’s case as we thought it was highly likely that it was not wrongful. David’s series affirms that assessment.

Special thanks to David for his efforts. We recommend his website and Substack to you.

Links

Why Reiner Fuellmich Was Guilty – Part 1

Why Reiner Fuellmich Was Guilty – Part 2

Why Reiner Fuellmich Was Guilty – Part 3

Why Reiner Fuellmich Was Guilty – Part 4

Related at Solari

Dr. Bhakdi’s Legal Case

The Prosecution of Roger Ver: A Lawfare Case Study

The Prosecution of Dutch MP Gideon van Meijeren: Where Media, Political, and Legal Corruption Converge


Log in or subscribe to the Solari Report to enjoy full access to exclusive articles and features.

Already a subscriber?

  • Weekly interviews, including the popular Money & Markets show
  • Quarterly deep dives into major trends affecting you day-to-day
  • Aggregation of the most relevant news stories
  • Subscriber-only events and a digital platform to connect with other subscribers
  • Weekly subscriber Q&A sessions with Catherine and the Solari team
Learn More

share Share

11 Comments

  1. I have read David’s series and found his evidence and insights well-researched.

  2. It would be interesting to hear Catherine’s take on this, particularly about Patrick Wood. I seem to remember a comment ages ago indicating Catherine’s displeasure at Füllmich’s actions.

    Füllmich once, shame on you. Füllmich twice …. It can be difficult to admit to being fooled or wrong.

    Füllmich’s big promises of lawsuits dried up very quickly. The follow-up “Corona Ausschuss” also hinted at the promise of evidence collection leading to tribunals. There was talk of “Nuremberg II”, but was clearly just discussion group. (This was especially obvious when chaired by the gormless Fischer.) Nevertheless, it certainly gave many people hope and sanity in gloomy times. No doubt many small donors will not be too unhappy with this particular mountebank. It certainly seemed at the time as though public dissidents were being pretty brave. Trying to make sense of the trial seemed absolutely impossible (Even in Germany, listening to the people who had been in the courtrooms.) It felt like some enormous obfuscation operation. Sadly, the prison sentence was just another wonderful opportunity for the press to dump on all corona-sceptics, particularly the “Querdenker” (lateral thinker) organisation.

    Just to put this German justice into perspective :

    Michael Ballweg, one of the Querdenker founders also spent nearly a year in prison accused of fraud, money laundering and tax evasion. But they couldn’t nail him, and he was exonerated and received some compensation in 2025.

    Füllmich : Sentenced to 3 years and 9 months for €700,000

    Uli Hoeness: Sentenced to 3.5 years in prison for failing to pay over €28.5 million in taxes on income from a secret Swiss bank account. Was in jail from June 2014 to February 2016 for tax evasion The former Bayern Munich president was released early after serving half his sentence…. And being let out at weekends, and Christmas etc. etc.

    PS – Not keen on David’s “Camp 1-2-3”. The world isn’t that simple, and we are all sharp on some things, and totally wrong on others.

    1. David’s Camp 1-2-3 is an effort to work out patterns. Defining patterns is always simplifying but often useful.

      I think the Corona Committee has done useful work and continued to do so after Reiner used it to grift and was dropped from it.

    1. Never had a good feeling about a promised lawsuit that never materialized. Glad I did not donate to him. It’s important to trust one’s intuition. I’ve been burned many times by exalted public figures whether it be politicians or ones turned politicians. Seems the only way out is through personal behavioral changes in how and where we spend our money. Grateful to this outlet.

  3. Catherine, I really don’t believe Reiner Fuellmich is guilty but I will read these reports. I watched him for years and he did great work exposing crime. He had to be stopped.

    1. Christina:

      I dropped from his efforts after dealing with him systematically lying to me and the group. After reading and hearing all the facts as best I can find them, I am confident he is guilty,

      Catherine

  4. Thank you CWF very much for running Dr David A. Hughes’ series – Why Dr Reiner Fuellmich Was Guilty. It came as a real shock yesterday when reading the Series, to be convinced by such an expert exposure. Why?
    I had never questioned Dr F might be correctly incarcerated, due to believing that Dr F had won a huge Volkswagen case and therefore had possibly made enemies.
    I was so wrong.

    It is a real lesson for me not to take sides without facts, based on only 2 or 3 sparse accounts [one very graphic] of Dr F in prison and his dramatic capture.
    Until I read the above Series yesterday afternoon I had felt so sorry for Dr F and sent him cards and even wrote to the then German Ambassador to UK with copy of article of what I believed to be Dr F’s plight.
    I played right into virtue signalling.
    Thank you for more of Dr Hughes’ detective work, correcting the inversion.
    Dr David Hughes has Turtled Forth indeed. I stand corrected. Thank you for this lesson

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379907026_Shock_and_Stress

    1. Lots of people being wrongfully prosecuted, so I appreciate your willingness to stand up for them.

Comments are closed.


© 2026 The Solari Report