This 6-pillar curriculum teaches the basic literacy we need to be personally and financially successful and to do so in a manner in which together we evolve a culture that supports the emergence of an advanced human civilization.
~ Due to the holiday in the US on July 4th, the audio will post on Friday, July 5th ~
By Catherine Austin Fitts
Theme:
Actionable Intelligence: Your Flack Jacket Against Fur Balls – Fur Balls, More Fur Balls, Fur Balls Everywhere You Turn
– Learning to differentiate between Entertainment, News and Actionable Intelligence
– Solari Mission: Actionable Intelligence for a Free and Inspired Life
Stories:
The latest pronouncement of US Failure
McConnell Pronouncement on SS vs. Ice Raids – Direct Connection?
Trouble ahead on finalizing US FY2020 Budget
Mobile Park rent increases – Social Security Cola, Wall Street shenanigans
The Bitcoin Pump
More bad news from heartland impacting farmers and food supply
Is California preparing for a heavy fire season?
New Executive Order Establishing a White House Council on Eliminating Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Housing
KKR investing in housing flippers; investment capital running up housing markets
Harris Staged Hit on Biden – upstaged by Putin in FT interview – “liberal experiment is over”
Summer Meetings: G-20, Bohemian Grove
US-China Trade Negotiations to Continue
Will Vanguard move into private equity?
Can the investors cut out Wall Street at last?
Proposed Capital Gains Adjustments in US: Protecting the Wealthy from Currency Debasement
INSTEX goes live – and Europe heats up
Hero:
Small Farmer & Author Joel Salatin
Former Pinterest Software Developer Eric Cochran
Let’s Go to the Movies:
Seed Swap in the Ozarks
Subscriber Charts, Close of July 3, 2019:
42 Comments
Dear Catherine
In your most recent interview with Dark Journalist last week you suggest that pension funds and insurance companies can achieve change if they stop buying treasuries. I wonder how effective that can be. Such a move can be countered by simply enacting new legislation making it compulsory for pension funds or insurance companies to buy treasuries.
You also mentioned shunning. Shunning is usually used by the powerful to keep dissenters of the group in toe so I wonder how effective shunning can be in reverse, in effecting change with the deep state.
Although in theory “we” are many and “they” are few, in reality they are big and powerful and we are diverse and apathetic. Therefore all shunning can do would be to reinforce their superior position by putting the shunners into a segregated class of underlings who can be identified as trouble makers and subsequently persecuted and set as an example to all those who dare to assert themselves.
I’d so much like to believe both tactics you suggest would indeed work, but somehow I don’t see either of them working in reality. PLEASE prove me wrong.
Dear Catherine
In your most recent interview with Dark Journalist last week you suggest that pension funds and insurance companies can achieve change if they stop buying treasuries. I wonder how effective that can be. Such a move can be countered by simply enacting new legislation making it compulsory for pension funds or insurance companies to buy treasuries.
You also mentioned shunning. Shunning is usually used by the powerful to keep dissenters of the group in toe so I wonder how effective shunning can be in reverse, in effecting change with the deep state.
Although in theory “we” are many and “they” are few, in reality they are big and powerful and we are diverse and apathetic. Therefore all shunning can do would be to reinforce their superior position by putting the shunners into a segregated class of underlings who can be identified as trouble makers and subsequently persecuted and set as an example to all those who dare to assert themselves.
I’d so much like to believe both tactics you suggest would indeed work, but somehow I don’t see either of them working in reality. PLEASE prove me wrong.
if the China bloc and the US bloc diverge permanently on the 5G conflict, and two separate telecommunications systems emerge, what will such a world look like? certain phone brands and apps and programs won’t work, depending on where you go? I imagine the cyber warfare would be intense in such a scenario. and as the internet of Things will be everywhere, it won’t be possible just to opt out of using the internet. more things will become dependent on an increasingly insecure network. I can’t picture a scenario where this turns out well for anyone.
if the China bloc and the US bloc diverge permanently on the 5G conflict, and two separate telecommunications systems emerge, what will such a world look like? certain phone brands and apps and programs won’t work, depending on where you go? I imagine the cyber warfare would be intense in such a scenario. and as the internet of Things will be everywhere, it won’t be possible just to opt out of using the internet. more things will become dependent on an increasingly insecure network. I can’t picture a scenario where this turns out well for anyone.
One of my favorite documentaries is ‘Look and See’ A Portrait of Wendell Berry.
It is beautifully done and his typewriter has a role. It is inspiration for a healthy agriculture. Just think how awesome it would be if someone with the sensibilities of Joel Salatin and Wendell Berry were at the head of the Dept. of Agriculture.
One of my favorite documentaries is ‘Look and See’ A Portrait of Wendell Berry.
It is beautifully done and his typewriter has a role. It is inspiration for a healthy agriculture. Just think how awesome it would be if someone with the sensibilities of Joel Salatin and Wendell Berry were at the head of the Dept. of Agriculture.
In your most recent interview with Dark Journalist last week you suggest that pension funds and insurance companies can achieve change if they stop buying treasuries. I wonder how effective that can be. Such a move can be countered by simply enacting new legislation making it compulsory for pension funds or insurance companies to buy treasuries.
You also mentioned shunning. Shunning is usually used by the powerful to keep dissenters of the group in toe so I wonder how effective shunning can be in reverse, in effecting change with the deep state.
Although in theory “we” are many and “they” are few, in reality they are big and powerful and we are diverse and apathetic. Therefore all shunning can do would be to reinforce their superior position by putting the shunners into a segregated class of underlings who can be identified as trouble makers and subsequently persecuted and set as an example to all those who dare to assert themselves.
I’d so much like to believe both tactics you suggest would indeed work, but somehow I don’t see either of them working in reality. PLEASE prove me wrong.
Dear Catherine
In your most recent interview with Dark Journalist last week you suggest that pension funds and insurance companies can achieve change if they stop buying treasuries. I wonder how effective that can be. Such a move can be countered by simply enacting new legislation making it compulsory for pension funds or insurance companies to buy treasuries.
You also mentioned shunning. Shunning is usually used by the powerful to keep dissenters of the group in toe so I wonder how effective shunning can be in reverse, in effecting change with the deep state.
Although in theory “we” are many and “they” are few, in reality they are big and powerful and we are diverse and apathetic. Therefore all shunning can do would be to reinforce their superior position by putting the shunners into a segregated class of underlings who can be identified as trouble makers and subsequently persecuted and set as an example to all those who dare to assert themselves.
I’d so much like to believe both tactics you suggest would indeed work, but somehow I don’t see either of them working in reality. PLEASE prove me wrong.
if the China bloc and the US bloc diverge permanently on the 5G conflict, and two separate telecommunications systems emerge, what will such a world look like? certain phone brands and apps and programs won’t work, depending on where you go? I imagine the cyber warfare would be intense in such a scenario. and as the internet of Things will be everywhere, it won’t be possible just to opt out of using the internet. more things will become dependent on an increasingly insecure network. I can’t picture a scenario where this turns out well for anyone.
if the China bloc and the US bloc diverge permanently on the 5G conflict, and two separate telecommunications systems emerge, what will such a world look like? certain phone brands and apps and programs won’t work, depending on where you go? I imagine the cyber warfare would be intense in such a scenario. and as the internet of Things will be everywhere, it won’t be possible just to opt out of using the internet. more things will become dependent on an increasingly insecure network. I can’t picture a scenario where this turns out well for anyone.
One of my favorite documentaries is ‘Look and See’ A Portrait of Wendell Berry.
It is beautifully done and his typewriter has a role. It is inspiration for a healthy agriculture. Just think how awesome it would be if someone with the sensibilities of Joel Salatin and Wendell Berry were at the head of the Dept. of Agriculture.
One of my favorite documentaries is ‘Look and See’ A Portrait of Wendell Berry.
It is beautifully done and his typewriter has a role. It is inspiration for a healthy agriculture. Just think how awesome it would be if someone with the sensibilities of Joel Salatin and Wendell Berry were at the head of the Dept. of Agriculture.
Dear Catherine
In your most recent interview with Dark Journalist last week you suggest that pension funds and insurance companies can achieve change if they stop buying treasuries. I wonder how effective that can be. Such a move can be countered by simply enacting new legislation making it compulsory for pension funds or insurance companies to buy treasuries.
You also mentioned shunning. Shunning is usually used by the powerful to keep dissenters of the group in toe so I wonder how effective shunning can be in reverse, in effecting change with the deep state.
Although in theory “we” are many and “they” are few, in reality they are big and powerful and we are diverse and apathetic. Therefore all shunning can do would be to reinforce their superior position by putting the shunners into a segregated class of underlings who can be identified as trouble makers and subsequently persecuted and set as an example to all those who dare to assert themselves.
I’d so much like to believe both tactics you suggest would indeed work, but somehow I don’t see either of them working in reality. PLEASE prove me wrong.
Dear Catherine
In your most recent interview with Dark Journalist last week you suggest that pension funds and insurance companies can achieve change if they stop buying treasuries. I wonder how effective that can be. Such a move can be countered by simply enacting new legislation making it compulsory for pension funds or insurance companies to buy treasuries.
You also mentioned shunning. Shunning is usually used by the powerful to keep dissenters of the group in toe so I wonder how effective shunning can be in reverse, in effecting change with the deep state.
Although in theory “we” are many and “they” are few, in reality they are big and powerful and we are diverse and apathetic. Therefore all shunning can do would be to reinforce their superior position by putting the shunners into a segregated class of underlings who can be identified as trouble makers and subsequently persecuted and set as an example to all those who dare to assert themselves.
I’d so much like to believe both tactics you suggest would indeed work, but somehow I don’t see either of them working in reality. PLEASE prove me wrong.
if the China bloc and the US bloc diverge permanently on the 5G conflict, and two separate telecommunications systems emerge, what will such a world look like? certain phone brands and apps and programs won’t work, depending on where you go? I imagine the cyber warfare would be intense in such a scenario. and as the internet of Things will be everywhere, it won’t be possible just to opt out of using the internet. more things will become dependent on an increasingly insecure network. I can’t picture a scenario where this turns out well for anyone.
if the China bloc and the US bloc diverge permanently on the 5G conflict, and two separate telecommunications systems emerge, what will such a world look like? certain phone brands and apps and programs won’t work, depending on where you go? I imagine the cyber warfare would be intense in such a scenario. and as the internet of Things will be everywhere, it won’t be possible just to opt out of using the internet. more things will become dependent on an increasingly insecure network. I can’t picture a scenario where this turns out well for anyone.
One of my favorite documentaries is ‘Look and See’ A Portrait of Wendell Berry.
It is beautifully done and his typewriter has a role. It is inspiration for a healthy agriculture. Just think how awesome it would be if someone with the sensibilities of Joel Salatin and Wendell Berry were at the head of the Dept. of Agriculture.
One of my favorite documentaries is ‘Look and See’ A Portrait of Wendell Berry.
It is beautifully done and his typewriter has a role. It is inspiration for a healthy agriculture. Just think how awesome it would be if someone with the sensibilities of Joel Salatin and Wendell Berry were at the head of the Dept. of Agriculture.
Here is the link to the trailer…
https://lookandseefilm.com/trailer