“If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency, and vibration.”
~ Nikola Tesla
By Ulrike Granögger
Dr. Beverly Rubik, biophysicist and founder of the Institute for Frontier Science, and Dr. Robert Brown, radiologist at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, recently published a critically important paper analyzing existing evidence for an influence of wireless communication radiation, including 5G, as a toxic environmental factor in the spread and severity of Covid-19.
Both the CDC and WHO assert on their websites that their model for disease causation is the so-called epidemiological triad. According to this model, three interactive factors need to be taken into account in understanding and providing countermeasures to a pandemic: the agent (the virus), the underlying health of the host (affected individuals), and the environment. Rubik and Brown point out that the official response to the Covid-19 crisis has not addressed environmental factors.
In today’s world, radiofrequency radiation from an increasing number of wireless communication devices is a ubiquitous environmental stressor that has been shown to have detrimental effects at all levels—from DNA mutations to damaged cells, tissues, and organs, including heart and neurological problems. These adverse health effects and their compounding effect on Covid-19 disease progression have largely been ignored by policymakers. The two authors call for an urgent redress in the epidemiological assessment of and public health policies regarding ambient wireless radiation before 5G wireless infrastructure is fully implemented worldwide.
Their peer-reviewed paper discusses a wide range of literature from decades of scientific research that has shown the toxic effects of wireless communication radiation on human and animal health. They demonstrate convincingly that the presence of ambient radiofrequencies and, in particular, the coincident rollout of 5G frequencies in highly affected pandemic areas (such as Wuhan, China) may be a significant contributor to Covid-19. Toxic effects of wireless radiation include adverse changes in the blood that could exacerbate clotting disorders, inflammation, and hypoxia (lack of sufficient oxygen)—several of the hallmarks of Covid-19. In addition, heart arrhythmias, immune system disruption, and oxidative stress provoking tissue damage, among other detrimental biologic effects from exposure to wireless, are virtually identical to symptomatic manifestations of Covid-19.
In this conversation, Beverly Rubik and Ulrike Granögger speak about the findings and implications of this significant research paper, including its extraordinary peer-review process and the obstacles the authors encountered on the way to publication.
In Part 2 of the interview—accessible to Solari subscribers only—Beverly and Ulrike explore some of the unanswered questions that are raised by the evidence of a correlation between viral diseases and radiofrequency radiation from 5G, as well as the effects of ambient wireless radiation on DNA, cell membrane voltage, and the future “Internet of Bodies” (IoB). Login to view Part 2.
In Money & Markets this week, Catherine and John Titus will cover the latest events and market developments. E-mail your questions for Ask Catherine or post at the Money & Markets commentary here.
Please join us this Thursday, March 10, for Is There a Connection between 5G and Covid-19? with Beverly Rubik.
Talk to you Thursday!
Related Reading:
“Evidence for a connection between coronavirus disease-19 and exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless communications including 5G.” Journal of Clinical and Translational Research 2021;7(5):666-681.
Peer-review correspondence (72 pages)
Institute for Frontier Science
Dr. Beverly Rubik’s website
Thank you for this interview, we feel that Dr. Rubik is spot on in speaking about the connection between certain symptoms and the technology within the home as far as electrosensitivity. We just moved out of Charlotte, NC (which is a 5G smart city) after witnessing all our neighbors thinking that they had to get the shots because of symptoms. What helped us is that we had all older technology and older appliances in our space and also we are sound healers. We also feel that she is spot on about the frequency of 60 Ghz.
Fool me once, shame on you! Fool me twice, shame on me!
https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/moderna-low-dose-covid-shots-work-kids-83617970
Great Job Ulrike!! I love the precision of how you compose your questions. Excellent analysis and conclusions to the many unanswered questions we have been faced with through this scamdemic. It has been very troublesome to see so many professionals loose their integrity and rational observations during this global scam. Dr. Beverly Rubik is a key player in helping to educate and inspire us to move forward in through the trials of our time. I would love to hear more on actions we can take as well as healing therapies and detox alternatives to counter act the onslaught of toxic sludge we are faced with on a daily basis.
As I listened to part two of the presentation, the thought occurred to me that the intention of medical care must also play into the results achieved by the patient. A physician whose intent is to promulgate a political program rather than a wellness program is bound to impart his ill intent to the unwitting subject. In a more intensive way than we did perhaps with America’s Frontline Doctors for therapeutics, we must seek out medical care of all types that has patient success in mind, rather than vaccine objectives as a goal. One can only imagine that the zest to prove mRNA a viable form of medical therapy will have the effect of its over prescription for every condition that presents. Patients without a pre-planned intent to receive holistic medicine may find themselves injected or supplied by IV the very same chemical treatment they successfully avoided in the covid operation. This will be particularly dangerous for patients who are highly incapacitated by their ailments.
It seems that the next step in group self-preservation must involve the establishment of a medical branch that will care for the patient more than for the incorrectly named “science.”
Amen. Next week we launch a Solari Health Series. Will be exploring the groups working on creating new medical institutions.
Glad to hear. I do think there are increasing numbers in medicine waking up to the hoax of the vax. Not incidentally, we may find that division between doctors and nurses will occur over the matter and that in itself may transmogrify the business.
Frankly the division I perceive is more about power than patients, too. Doctors rightly reserve professional autonomy in judgement, which was abridged by mandates, whereas nurses seem to love being bosses with the power to enforce punctilios. I am only half joking.