How UN Policies Are Paving the Way for the Land Grab
With Kate Mason
“To the framers of the U.S. Constitution, property was as sacred as life and liberty. The inalienable right to own—and control the use of—private property is perhaps the single most important principle responsible for the growth and prosperity of America. It is a right that is being systematically eroded. Private ownership of land is not compatible with socialism, communism, or with global governance as described by the United Nations. Stalin, Hitler, Castro, and Mao—all took steps to forcefully nationalize the land as an essential first step toward controlling their citizens. The UN, without the use of military force, is attempting to achieve the same result.”
~ Henry Lamb (author of The Rise of Global Governance, longtime Agenda 21 critic, and founding chairman of Sovereignty International)
In Australia and elsewhere, a perfect storm of regulations is laying the groundwork to move people out of their houses and off their lands. Simultaneously, public infrastructure is being privatized. The playbook trickles down from the level of UN policies into national, state, and municipal land use policies.
Here’s an article you might enjoy, hosts… describes Larry Fink’s 98 million dollar private jet he uses to spread the gospel of Global Warming and Climate Change.
So, the bottom line is their plan is to have you rent, not own, and the will depreciate any equity you have in any houses you own via taxation, flood zone declarations, and other quasi governmental controls. If you decided to live in a motor home you would be taxed to death for fuel, use taxes and probably carbon taxes for not being static. And that money goes where? Back into infrastructure? Not in a 15 minute city. You will either bike, walk or rickshaw.
Here’s an article you might enjoy, hosts… describes Larry Fink’s 98 million dollar private jet he uses to spread the gospel of Global Warming and Climate Change.
https://www.afr.com/rear-window/climate-warrior-larry-fink-s-98m-gulfstream-20200226-p544j0
So, the bottom line is their plan is to have you rent, not own, and the will depreciate any equity you have in any houses you own via taxation, flood zone declarations, and other quasi governmental controls. If you decided to live in a motor home you would be taxed to death for fuel, use taxes and probably carbon taxes for not being static. And that money goes where? Back into infrastructure? Not in a 15 minute city. You will either bike, walk or rickshaw.
Sorry for the misspellings. I haven’t invested in Grammarly to write my comments for me.