This 6-pillar curriculum teaches the basic literacy we need to be personally and financially successful and to do so in a manner in which together we evolve a culture that supports the emergence of an advanced human civilization.
“Every crisis—real or not—yields the same demand: someone must sit in the middle and sort it out. War reparations need processing, bank failures need coordinating, carbon emissions need measuring, pandemic responses need directing…. This intermediary is a clearinghouse.”
Before anyone can reject the control grid and programmable money, they first have to be able to see the encroaching threats. Our two heroes this week—Dr. Meryl Nass and the Substack author who goes by the pen name “Escape Key” (or ESC)—have done a great deal, both individually and in two fascinating exchanges on CHD.TV, to “decode” and make visible “the mechanisms by which the globalists—the cabal, the elites—are trying to take over the world.”
Dr. Nass is no stranger at Solari. In May 2024, we highlighted her and the organization that she founded, Door to Freedom, for their tenacious and effective pushback against the World Health Organization’s attempted power grab via sovereignty-ceding International Health Regulation amendments. The U.S. formally rejected the amendments in July 2025. At the time, we thanked Nass for “helping us understand the bigger picture—the extent to which control of the financial system and sovereign debt is being used to build the power of entities with sovereign immunity.”
In the Solari post earlier this year titled “Was Jeffrey Epstein the Father of Programmable Money?” (Feb. 18, 2026), Catherine drew attention to Escape Key’s perceptive dot-connecting with respect to Epstein’s labors on behalf of the Rothschild network. In his extensive writings since then, he has done even more, reverse-engineering the cabal’s painstaking construction of an invisible control web (via international organizations, tech standards, “sustainable development goals,” and more) that is outside of, and supersedes, democratic institutions.
In a recent three-way discussion, Nass, Catherine, and Escape Key elaborated on some key points:
Global “elites” have talked and written about the notion of a global government for a long time. As one example, Virginia Woolf’s husband Leonard Woolf wrote a report in 2016 for Britain’s Fabian Society, prefaced by playwright George Bernard Shaw, titled simply, International Government. (Catherine points out that this report appeared not long after the creation of the Federal Reserve in the U.S.)
The afficionados of global governance all share the same goal (central control), whether “left” or “right”—the Bolsheviks and Nazis both piloted many of the underlying ideas.
“Global Ethics” have been used as a tool to move global governance plans forward, insidiously manipulating people’s behavior through a “virtue scam” that shames and guilt-trips people with terms like “common good,” “sustainable development” and “climate change.” Twitter crashed ESC’s account when he started digging into the weaponization of “morality” and “ethics.” However, Nass points out that globalists’ framing of “the most awful concepts in virtue-signaling language … is a double-edged sword for them, because people hate being tricked and fooled” [emphasis in original].
Globalist “standards” and approaches like the UN’s “One Health” are designed to be “shielded from public scrutiny.” As ESC says, “Black box models are perfect for authoritarians.”
In the old days of World Bank and International Monetary Fund structural adjustment programs, globalist entities imposed “conditionalities” at the country level. With currently available technologies, the conditionalities can now be set at the individual level. This is the goal of programmable money. In BIS-speak, programmable money is a “third-party lock” system where a “trusted third party determines when [or whether] a payment should be triggered.” Mr. Global’s complex and dynamic algorithms function as the “intermediary” between buyers and sellers, adjusting in real time to each person’s behavior.
Nass, Escape Key, and Catherine all agree that the system the central bankers are building is “incredibly brittle,” and therein lies our hope. If each of us asks, “What is it that I’m not allowed to do?” and then lawfully pushes against those boundaries, we will create the kind of “leakage” that drives the bankers crazy.
We encourage you to support and share Nass’s and ESC’s work. The big picture is a lot clearer because of their efforts.
